archie bunker wrote:
Exactly! So, why don't you STFU when v**ers in states ban it?
V**ers didn’t and won’t ban a******n. If it was on the b****t in every state a******n rights would be approved with the possible exception of Utah.
Kevyn wrote:
V**ers didn’t and won’t ban a******n. If it was on the b****t in every state a******n rights would be approved with the possible exception of Utah.
Kevyn, can you think of any other creature that k**ls their offspring comparable to the viciousness of humans?
I don't think that the Republicans understand just how unpopular their position on no a******n is and how much it is hurting them.
pegw wrote:
I don't think that the Republicans understand just how unpopular their position on no a******n is and how much it is hurting them.
I disagree… Christian republicans do understand what their position means.
It means that they stand in opposition to satan and his wish to destroy All of God’s people and creation.
Kevyn wrote:
As a libertarian you should want women to decide.
You are right as rain.
Anyone believing that we are individuals that enjoy k*****g are deluded and ignorant.
php22 wrote:
You are right as rain.
Anyone believing that we are individuals that enjoy k*****g are deluded and ignorant.
Weather or not you enjoy it is not the point. The babies are horribly k**led for the convenience of others.
php22 wrote:
You are right as rain.
Anyone believing that we are individuals that enjoy k*****g are deluded and ignorant.
I don't care whether you enjoy it or not. It is irrelevant to the matter. Just as irrelevant as 'love' or "h**e" is to any crime.
I'm tired or arguing about it. Follow you conscience, travel to another state or wh**ever. It is simply a "states" issue. Each state adopts its laws at its own peril.
For me, just do what you want, whenever you want. I'd recommend allowing a******n up to the day before the kid's 18 birthday. Then they would behave.
It's a state issue, that has been decided. Push a******n all you want, lie about it too, it's the only issue democrats can win on...until they tell the t***h about their a******n position of legal a******ns "until the child crowns". Then the democrats lose, this is the reason Biden didn't push his t*********r idiocy on his Spanish speaking cite.
Kevyn wrote:
As a libertarian you should want women to decide.
As a homosexual why do you care?
pegw wrote:
I don't think that the Republicans understand just how unpopular their position on no a******n is and how much it is hurting them.
So, to you monsters murdering children is a mere popularity issue? S***ery was a kind and benevolent act compared to murdering babies. A******n is the most unnatural act a woman can ever do and you endorse it with glee. You have no concept or understanding of evil. You will.
Kevyn wrote:
V**ers didn’t and won’t ban a******n. If it was on the b****t in every state a******n rights would be approved with the possible exception of Utah.
Wrong again...if you believe that why didn't the democrats "a******n until the child crowns" bill never leave the house.
15 weeks is reasonable. 6 weeks isn't enough time and 36+ weeks is murder/despicable
pegw wrote:
I don't think that the Republicans understand just how unpopular their position on no a******n is and how much it is hurting them.
You should admire their convictions and morals...but you can't do that...you're a l*****t
Kevyn wrote:
As a libertarian you should want women to decide.
I'm a woman and don't appreciate a man telling me what I should want!
pegw wrote:
I don't think that the Republicans understand just how unpopular their position on no a******n is and how much it is hurting them.
This may come as a surprise to you but we tend to care more about a babies life then we do a politival position.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.