WinkyTink wrote:
Well, yes my winky turned black and fell off from lack of use, the stub is quite small. Try for a second, to see my absurd point as a mechanism to demonstrate the obscene pro-a******n, anytime up to birth crowd how ridiculous their arguments are..... oh and laugh a little.
I'm so sorry you didn't take your problem in hand, it might have helped your situation. π As for your absurd point π€ do you think I would condone said action? Personally I don't condone any of it. But I don't live in the shoe's and make decisions for those women. It was the democrats idea to say you can have an a******n up to and including until the baby was crowning. That's d********g! Why would the government condone that? T-cells, body parts? Having Row V Wade reversed put an end to the absurdly of it all. But then that created some real problems for those women who really needed that sort of treatment. Those decisions should be between the doctor and his or her patients and the Dr not be sent to jail. Here is an example. Let's say your 1/2 way through your pregnancy and you find out your baby is brain dead and won't last but a few minutes after birth. What would you do? Your wife can be septic any time. Should someone else (government or insurance companies) dictate how best for you to deal with such a matter? If so why? Does it affect those people who are not having to deal with such a dilemma? Should those people really need to have a say so? I think not. 12 weeks use to be the cut off for having an a******n. It's quite possible if that hadn't changed we would not be having this conversation. What are your thoughts?