RFK Jr. Says There Is Little Evidence Of I**********n On J6 (Page 5): Some attack. Hours of video's of the C*****l p****e opening the doors and letting people into the Capital. Do you...

Byrd

Kevyn wrote:

Hours of video of violent terrorists attacking our Capitol.

Some attack. Hours of video's of the C*****l p****e opening the doors and letting people into the Capital. Do you know the people that attacked the police were actually Trump supporters? No you don't. they may have been people put there by the Democrats. There was no i**********n. The definition of an i**********n is: "An i**********n is an armed r**t". Nobody was armed but the C*****l p****e. Wake up!!!!!!!

martsiva

kittibob wrote:

It's a fact that some of the J** 6 i**********nists were carrying firearms. Tucker Carlson, who claimed that there were no firearms, is a liar who spouts misinformation on a daily basis. J** 6 was an i**********n carried out by a group of gullible people, some of whom went to jail because they believed Trump's lies. If you keep watching Tucker you'll most likely never know the t***h about anything.

Really? Show us your 'facts'!

bylm1-Bernie

lindynduff1 wrote:

I’m not an extremist. I not saying Biden is the p... (show quote)

The Dems are the ones using the "Extremist" term. I wouldn't call that name calling but it sure has caught on with the libs. As I have said many times about Trump, I wouldn't pick him for a Sunday School teacher or Church Elder but I look at the past performance and I can tell you unequivocally that I would prefer his term to what we have been blessed with for the past 3+ years under Joe. I don't see how anyone could prefer this crap. Of course Joe says he will stop g****l w*****g and I'm sure I don't like his methods. I guess we are stuck v****g for the choices we have before us so I don't see any reasonable option other than what has been shown to work. Joe's been in politics for 50 yrs and his next good decision will be his first.

martsiva

lindynduff1 wrote:

I’m not an extremist. I not saying Biden is the p... (show quote)

But you`re comfortable with a party that supports the worst border crisis this country has ever seen. You are comfortable with a party that censors free speech - you are comfortable with a party that puts America and Americans last behind i******s and a foreign government - right?

Byrd

martsiva wrote:

But you`re comfortable with a party that supports the worst border crisis this country has ever seen. You are comfortable with a party that censors free speech - you are comfortable with a party that puts America and Americans last behind i******s and a foreign government - right?

I wonder why there are about as many women at the Trump rallies as there are men?.

WEBCO

saltwind 78 wrote:

XXX, I saw the entire incident in real time as it ... (show quote)

Actual evidence. Who offers the NG to stop their own insurection?

Unintended Consequences

Ricktloml wrote:

It was never in i**********n. One was created to hang on Trump/supporters, (it isn't just Trump the Left wants to crush...it's all of Trump's supporters as well). And the vile l*****ts who turned a blind eye to their pals murdering people/burning down cities/l**ting have gleefully made their fellow Americans political prisoners for exorcising their free speech rights.

I**********n- a violent uprising against an authority or government.
140 officers injured; barriers knocked over; forced entrance to the caoitol through windows and doors; offices and rooms ransacked; shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence and Where's Nancy with intent to do harm
Sounds pretty violent. What were they trying to do. They were trying to change the outcome of the e******n.
Sounds like an i**********n to me.

Byrd

Unintended Consequences wrote:

I**********n- a violent uprising against an authority or government.
140 officers injured; barriers knocked over; forced entrance to the caoitol through windows and doors; offices and rooms ransacked; shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence and Where's Nancy with intent to do harm
Sounds pretty violent. What were they trying to do. They were trying to change the outcome of the e******n.
Sounds like an i**********n to me.

Sorry, but the definition of an i**********n is: "An armed revolt" Nobody was armed but the C*****l P****e. There were people there who were not Trump supporters. Do you know whether the police was attacked by these people or Trumps supporters? Nobody does. Trump has nothing to do with it. He said they should do a peaceful protest. He wesn't even there.

bylm1-Bernie

Unintended Consequences wrote:

I**********n- a violent uprising against an authority or government.
140 officers injured; barriers knocked over; forced entrance to the caoitol through windows and doors; offices and rooms ransacked; shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence and Where's Nancy with intent to do harm
Sounds pretty violent. What were they trying to do. They were trying to change the outcome of the e******n.
Sounds like an i**********n to me.

It would because you want it to sound like one. How do you ascertain what someone's intent is? I always wonder why Nancy didn't arrange for more police protection when the intelligence available said there would be 50 to 100 thousand protesters coming. I don't claim to know their intent but it appears they may have wanted it. Same way with the guards holding the door open for people to come in.

Byrd

bylm1-Bernie wrote:

It would because you want it to sound like one. How do you ascertain what someone's intent is? I always wonder why Nancy didn't arrange for more police protection when the intelligence available said there would be 50 to 100 thousand protesters coming. I don't claim to know their intent but it appears they may have wanted it. Same way with the guards holding the door open for people to come in.

It was a made up fraud from the start. Trump asked for National Guard troops and was turned down. They could have had more police but refused them. If they were not allowed in, why did the guards hold the doors open for them to come in?

tomhoff24

billy a wrote:

True. A r**t, complete with classic mob-mentality ... (show quote)

Politely ushering and getting beaten on?! Give me a break!

Byrd

tomhoff24 wrote:

Politely ushering and getting beaten on?! Give me a break!

Nobody knows if these people who beat up the cops were Trump supporters or Biden supporters. The cops had guns, why did they allow themselves to be beat up? Did they have orders not to use them. One of them did when he murdered a young girl who was not beating up anybody, and she definitely was no threat to him.

bylm1-Bernie

1ProudAmerican wrote:

I can’t v**e for a man who behaves badly with unborn babies and spends MY money to pay for the debt of students who should be paying their own debts.

Good one!

WEBCO

Unintended Consequences wrote:

I**********n- a violent uprising against an authority or government.
140 officers injured; barriers knocked over; forced entrance to the caoitol through windows and doors; offices and rooms ransacked; shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence and Where's Nancy with intent to do harm
Sounds pretty violent. What were they trying to do. They were trying to change the outcome of the e******n.
Sounds like an i**********n to me.

Why did the police start attacking the protesters first? Why did the police open doors? Why was c*****l p****e at half staff?
Sounds like a set up to me. Until you can answer basic questions you're simply a useful i***t following the "narrative" so carefully laid out.

billy a Loc: South Florida

tomhoff24 wrote:

Politely ushering and getting beaten on?! Give me a break!

If the video wasn't live, it was on a seven-second delay. Millions of Americans watched these uniformed C*****l P****e calmly and courteously direct people into the building. There is no debate here.