No c*****e c****e ? (Page 2): Just facts. I leave the decisions based on emotions to those who are l*****ts. This one eruption in Tonga produced more CO2 then humans emit in a year...

WEBCO

federally indicted mattoid wrote:

Because it's webco's "feel fact."

Just facts. I leave the decisions based on emotions to those who are l*****ts. This one eruption in Tonga produced more CO2 then humans emit in a year...

You really feel like humans are altering earth's cycles?

And this one in Iceland proves how far off the science is on this subject.

Oldsalt

Man made c*****e c****e is a h**x. It was in the '60s, the '70s, the '80s, and the '90s. If you follow the money and check out a little history you will find that it's all about money and control of people. Plants NEED CO2 to survive. We NEED plants to produce oxygen for us to survive.

publican

Oldsalt wrote:

Man made c*****e c****e is a h**x. It was in the '60s, the '70s, the '80s, and the '90s. If you follow the money and check out a little history you will find that it's all about money and control of people. Plants NEED CO2 to survive. We NEED plants to produce oxygen for us to survive.

It is an infallible indicator of the inferior mind that it denies what it does not understand.

The ignorant believe that if words are put into ALL CAPS they become more true.

WEBCO

publican wrote:

It is an infallible indicator of the inferior mind that it denies what it does not understand.

The ignorant believe that if words are put into ALL CAPS they become more true.

So he's right, what does your feeble mind and lack of understanding have to do with the climate changing?

publican

WEBCO wrote:

So...weather

Anthropogenic c*****e c****e is a falsehood. It doesn't matter how often you say it, it doesn't make it true.

Anthropogenic c*****e c****e is a well-established FACT. It doesn't matter how often you deny it, it doesn't make it false.[/quote]

WEBCO

It most certainly is NOT a fact, let alone a well established one. No matter how often you say it is doesn't change that FACT.

publican

WEBCO wrote:

It most certainly is NOT a fact, let alone a well established one. No matter how often you say it is doesn't change that FACT.

OK, webbie, you have made a claim and repeated it. Now provide some scientific evidence to support your claim. Quoting quacks, industry hacks, and politicians is not allowed.

WEBCO

You have made a claim, now support it with facts and evidence. Quoting qwuaks, politicians, or government paid stooges don't count...good luck

publican

WEBCO wrote:

You have made a claim, now support it with facts and evidence. Quoting qwuaks, politicians, or government paid stooges don't count...good luck

Since you are quite certain that global c*****e c****e is a h**x, I presume you are familiar with every one of the several lines of evidence all of which prove the reality of c*****e c****e; and I presume you can refute every one of them. So let's hear it!

EmilyD

publican wrote:

Since you are quite certain that global c*****e c****e is a h**x, I presume you are familiar with every one of the several lines of evidence all of which prove the reality of c*****e c****e; and I presume you can refute every one of them. So let's hear it!

Do you think the solar eclipse on Monday was affected by the Earth's c*****e c****e issues?

The ladies on "The View" do....is that something you subscribe to as well? And if so, in what way was the eclipse c*********d by the Earth's alleged "c*****e c****e" problems?

..

publican

EmilyD wrote:

Do you think the solar eclipse on Monday was affected by the Earth's c*****e c****e issues?

The ladies on "The View" do....is that something you subscribe to as well? And if so, in what way was the eclipse c*********d by the Earth's alleged "c*****e c****e" problems?

..

You're pulling my leg.

publican

EmilyD wrote:

Do you think the solar eclipse on Monday was affected by the Earth's c*****e c****e issues?

The ladies on "The View" do....is that something you subscribe to as well? And if so, in what way was the eclipse c*********d by the Earth's alleged "c*****e c****e" problems?

..

A long time ago it was believed that when an eclipse occurred, what was actually happening was that some celestial creature was eating the sun. So they would beat drums and make lots of noise to scare it off. And sure enough it got scared away and the sun returned! Now they tell us it is the moon moving in front of the sun. Can’t they make up their minds? They keep changing the story. I'll stick with the hungry creature. That explanation comports with my sincerely held beliefs, so it must be correct. Anyone who says differently has been brainwashed by the deep state.

Lily

NotMAGA wrote:

When international financial wizards are developing contingency plans for disruptions caused to the markets by events caused by it, it could be time to reevaluate those obdurate "Nothing to see here!" mindsets.

https://www.isda.org/2024/02/12/climate-scenario-analysis-in-the-trading-book-phase-ii/

When you people decide to hold China and India to the same standards you want to impose on us, come talk to me. Until then you got nothing to stand on.

EmilyD

publican wrote:

You're pulling my leg.

No. It's a legitimate question. The ladies on the View said it was, and all of them shook their heads in agreement - and the audience cheered and clapped....so obviously some people believe that the eclipse was affected by the Earth's c*****e c****e issues.

I'm just wondering what it is about the eclipse that was c*********d by c*****e c****e. I didn't get that answer from what The View ladies were saying, and I can't find the answer anywhere on the internet as to what exactly about our climate had an effect on the eclipse.

...

publican

EmilyD wrote:

No. It's a legitimate question. The ladies on the ... (show quote)

Well, the short answer is that those View ladies are either joking or else are unbelievably ignorant. In any case don't take them seriously.