Trump Is Entitled To Have Federal Courts Intervene When a State Threatens His Fundamental Rights. Federal Courts Must Intervene: SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in the...

tbutkovich

SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

ANNOTATIONS

Generally
Due process under the Fourteenth Amendment can be broken down into two categories: procedural due process and substantive due process. Procedural due process, based on principles of “fundamental fairness,” addresses which legal procedures are required to be followed in state proceedings. Relevant issues, as discussed in detail below, include notice, opportunity for hearing, confrontation and cross-examination, discovery, basis of decision, and availability of counsel.
Substantive due process, although also based on principles of “fundamental fairness,” is used to evaluate whether a law can be applied by states at all, regardless of the procedure followed. Substantive due process has generally dealt with specific subject areas, such as liberty of contract or privacy, and over time has alternately emphasized the importance of economic and noneconomic matters. In theory, the issues of procedural and substantive due process are closely related. In reality, substantive due process has had greater political import, as significant portions of a state legislature’s substantive jurisdiction can be restricted by its application.

Although the extent of the rights protected by substantive due process may be controversial, its theoretical basis is firmly established and forms the basis for much of modern constitutional case law. Passage of the Reconstruction Amendments (13th, 14th, and 15th) gave the federal courts the authority to intervene when a state threatened fundamental rights of its citizens and one of the most important doctrines ﬂowing from this is the application of the Bill of Rights to the states through the Due Process Clause. Through the process of “selective incorporation,” most of the provisions of the first eight Amendments, such as free speech, freedom of religion, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, are applied against the states as they are against the federal government.

This is an unreasonable seizure of Trump's Property. The Federal Courts Must Intervene!

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

tbutkovich wrote:

SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

ANNOTATIONS

Generally
Due process under the Fourteenth Amendment can be broken down into two categories: procedural due process and substantive due process. Procedural due process, based on principles of “fundamental fairness,” addresses which legal procedures are required to be followed in state proceedings. Relevant issues, as discussed in detail below, include notice, opportunity for hearing, confrontation and cross-examination, discovery, basis of decision, and availability of counsel.
Substantive due process, although also based on principles of “fundamental fairness,” is used to evaluate whether a law can be applied by states at all, regardless of the procedure followed. Substantive due process has generally dealt with specific subject areas, such as liberty of contract or privacy, and over time has alternately emphasized the importance of economic and noneconomic matters. In theory, the issues of procedural and substantive due process are closely related. In reality, substantive due process has had greater political import, as significant portions of a state legislature’s substantive jurisdiction can be restricted by its application.

Although the extent of the rights protected by substantive due process may be controversial, its theoretical basis is firmly established and forms the basis for much of modern constitutional case law. Passage of the Reconstruction Amendments (13th, 14th, and 15th) gave the federal courts the authority to intervene when a state threatened fundamental rights of its citizens and one of the most important doctrines ﬂowing from this is the application of the Bill of Rights to the states through the Due Process Clause. Through the process of “selective incorporation,” most of the provisions of the first eight Amendments, such as free speech, freedom of religion, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, are applied against the states as they are against the federal government.

This is an unreasonable seizure of Trump's Property. The Federal Courts Must Intervene!

SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in the ... (show quote)

Can’t do the time
Or pay the fine ,
Don’t do the crime !!!!!!!
Oh Donny just take the plane and Go !!!!

tbutkovich

No Crime, No Fine, No Time. Kangaroo Court!

Liberty Tree

tbutkovich wrote:

SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

ANNOTATIONS

Generally
Due process under the Fourteenth Amendment can be broken down into two categories: procedural due process and substantive due process. Procedural due process, based on principles of “fundamental fairness,” addresses which legal procedures are required to be followed in state proceedings. Relevant issues, as discussed in detail below, include notice, opportunity for hearing, confrontation and cross-examination, discovery, basis of decision, and availability of counsel.
Substantive due process, although also based on principles of “fundamental fairness,” is used to evaluate whether a law can be applied by states at all, regardless of the procedure followed. Substantive due process has generally dealt with specific subject areas, such as liberty of contract or privacy, and over time has alternately emphasized the importance of economic and noneconomic matters. In theory, the issues of procedural and substantive due process are closely related. In reality, substantive due process has had greater political import, as significant portions of a state legislature’s substantive jurisdiction can be restricted by its application.

Although the extent of the rights protected by substantive due process may be controversial, its theoretical basis is firmly established and forms the basis for much of modern constitutional case law. Passage of the Reconstruction Amendments (13th, 14th, and 15th) gave the federal courts the authority to intervene when a state threatened fundamental rights of its citizens and one of the most important doctrines ﬂowing from this is the application of the Bill of Rights to the states through the Due Process Clause. Through the process of “selective incorporation,” most of the provisions of the first eight Amendments, such as free speech, freedom of religion, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, are applied against the states as they are against the federal government.

This is an unreasonable seizure of Trump's Property. The Federal Courts Must Intervene!

SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in the ... (show quote)

Also a violation of the 8th amendment against unreasonable bail.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Milosia2 wrote:

Can’t do the time
Or pay the fine ,
Don’t do the crime !!!!!!!
Oh Donny just take the plane and Go !!!!

***Don’t do the crime !!!!!!!
>>>He didn't do a crime. There were no victims. No Fraud and all made money on time.
***Oh Donny just take the plane and Go !!!!
>>>Oh Milly, just take the plane and Go !!!!

Kevyn

Liberty Tree wrote:

Also a violation of the 8th amendment against unreasonable bail.

It is not bail, it is a monetary fine to recover the amount of the fraud.

Liberty Tree

Kevyn wrote:

It is not bail, it is a monetary fine to recover the amount of the fraud.

Falls under unusual punishment designed to stop his right to appeal. Also, covers excessive fines.

tbutkovich

Kevyn wrote:

It is not bail, it is a monetary fine to recover the amount of the fraud.

Who was the victim they are recovering the money for. The state of New York where he provided jobs, employment taxes, economic growth, and more.

The money is being stolen by former cab driver, now judge who colluded with an unscrupulous district attorney who’s campaign promise was to get Trump having brought charges and prosecution of a bogus criminal case which has no victim and no basis. These two criminals are using the justice system to create a case, dismiss arguments, demand an exhorbitant/unreasonable bail, demand payment before the case is appealed, imposing restrictions on the sources and methods of acquiring the funds and not granting him a negotiating position to reduce the bail amount. They are treating him worse than a drug lord. Their objective is to steal his personal wealth enriching themselves and achieving accolades from their unscrupulous supporters.

But America knows what these two heartless, charred souls are up to. They will one day have to face up to judgement not in an earthly court of law but the highest court where their actions will be judged before the “Great White Throne!”

David L Loc: Central Wisconsin

Milosia2 wrote:

Can’t do the time
Or pay the fine ,
Don’t do the crime !!!!!!!
Oh Donny just take the plane and Go !!!!

Oh Millie. please show him how to do it. Get on plane and GO. How about Haiti? Sounds like nice place for you.

David L Loc: Central Wisconsin

Kevyn wrote:

It is not bail, it is a monetary fine to recover the amount of the fraud.

Hey Einstein. Who did he defraud??

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

Milosia2 wrote:

Can’t do the time
Or pay the fine ,
Don’t do the crime !!!!!!!
Oh Donny just take the plane and Go !!!!

He didn't do anything that thousands of others haven't done. Some prosecutor should look into all of your loan applications.

And some prosecutor should look into the all the loan applications of Arthur Engoron, Alvin Bragg and Letitia James & subject them to the same things. They should also be put on trial for violation of The Eighth Amendment to The Constitution.

If prosecutors of other states looked into it, they might be able to put out arrest warrants for all three of them.

martsiva

Kevyn wrote:

It is not bail, it is a monetary fine to recover the amount of the fraud.

Recover?? Was New York defrauded out of money?? Was anything stolen from them?? The fraud is a judge sayinhg he knows more about evaluating property than the banks who said there was NO fraud!!

tbutkovich

martsiva wrote:

Recover?? Was New York defrauded out of money?? Was anything stolen from them?? The fraud is a judge sayinhg he knows more about evaluating property than the banks who said there was NO fraud!!

Democrats argue they can’t let the facts and application of fair treatment influence the objective which is to take away all his privately financed campaign funds in an effort to derail his efforts to attain re-e******n.

pegw

tbutkovich wrote:

SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

ANNOTATIONS

Generally
Due process under the Fourteenth Amendment can be broken down into two categories: procedural due process and substantive due process. Procedural due process, based on principles of “fundamental fairness,” addresses which legal procedures are required to be followed in state proceedings. Relevant issues, as discussed in detail below, include notice, opportunity for hearing, confrontation and cross-examination, discovery, basis of decision, and availability of counsel.
Substantive due process, although also based on principles of “fundamental fairness,” is used to evaluate whether a law can be applied by states at all, regardless of the procedure followed. Substantive due process has generally dealt with specific subject areas, such as liberty of contract or privacy, and over time has alternately emphasized the importance of economic and noneconomic matters. In theory, the issues of procedural and substantive due process are closely related. In reality, substantive due process has had greater political import, as significant portions of a state legislature’s substantive jurisdiction can be restricted by its application.

Although the extent of the rights protected by substantive due process may be controversial, its theoretical basis is firmly established and forms the basis for much of modern constitutional case law. Passage of the Reconstruction Amendments (13th, 14th, and 15th) gave the federal courts the authority to intervene when a state threatened fundamental rights of its citizens and one of the most important doctrines ﬂowing from this is the application of the Bill of Rights to the states through the Due Process Clause. Through the process of “selective incorporation,” most of the provisions of the first eight Amendments, such as free speech, freedom of religion, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, are applied against the states as they are against the federal government.

This is an unreasonable seizure of Trump's Property. The Federal Courts Must Intervene!

SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in the ... (show quote)

If you rob a bank, you don't get to keep the money regardless if you do it by gun point or by committing fraud. Our favorite career criminal did it by fraud and had a two month trial and was found guilty.

tbutkovich

Fraud becomes a crime when it is a “knowing misrepresentation of the t***h or concealment of a material fact” to induce another to act to his or her detriment.

Let’s break this down. It has to be a knowing misrepresentation of the t***h. You go to borrow money on your house. The lender will lend you eighty percent of its value. Each bank does an appraisal and they all differ. The one with the highest appraisal lends you the money. You take the money offered for the highest appraisal. Where is the crime when one tries to get the best value for one’s property.

How did he induce another to act? Did he hold a gun to the bankers head forcing them to lend him the money?

Finally, Did the fraud lead to the lender’s detriment? No, the bank made interest on the entire loan and it was all paid back over a long term loan contract Where’s the detriment?

Peg, you need a base course in Economics 101 and Contract Law 100!