NotMAGA wrote:
Lol -; (and I actually did. That was a very nice comment even if you were being a teeny bit sarcastic. 😊😉
There really was no particular point. I just thought it was an interesting article, and wondered what kind of opinions it might generate. Usually, one would expect this kind of thing more from a liberal leaning judge, except that since this was 2A stuff, the decision came from one that's on the conservative side.
I was hoping for something more of an explanation from you, but owning to my obvious propensity to misunderstand your meanings, I am forced to accept that you had no point. I obviously tend to over think events.
Have a pleasant morning.
NotMAGA wrote:
Take it up with your state legislator if you disagree.
Most states have had that policy in place for a very long time.
In fact, in a lot of states you lose your right to v**e if you are convicted of a felony crime. We were taught about that in high school.
Only if on parole....all citizens can v**e if they have paid their debt to society..no inmate can v**e in any state almost all inmates have to be in a halfway house when first released for various amounts of time depending on the sentence they received....but after all requirements have been met and they are no longer on any parole or probation then I believe the right to v**e is restored in every state.... almost total certain but I'm not ready to bet
Wickedestoldwolf wrote:
If you lose your rights as an American then I guess you'd no longer be an American? Yet it clearly states shall not be infringed. This is all just politics nothing else.
Also states that a well regulated milita is to secure a free state....I feel that many people don't realize that the amendments can be changed with a over 2/3 rds majority across the country and that is what the founding fathers wrote into the constitution because they were much aware that the future would bring changes and more changes so let's make a living document
pescado rojo wrote:
She is a Kentucky Circuit Court judge. If you had any idea what a state circuit court decision means, you would not have exposed your ignorance so egregiously.
In most states, there are provisions for people convicted of non-violent felonies to have their rights restored after meeting certain requirements. Your source does not list any violent felonies on said defendants rap sheet.
Pescado rojo: [ a little new here?] That "poster", of which you speak, incessently posts, "that which is *inane, &
"out to lunch"...[ he wallows, in "Un-t***h"...[ deviating from that which is proven, to be true]..So, beating your
head against a brick wall, is futile, & un-necesarry! By-pass the trivial mindset, of demo'rat, un-sensibility!
save your energy, for those that are "open to the t***h", & not terminally minded!
Any convicted felon, that possesses, a "gun", *weapon, is violating the Registered, "on the books law"!
Any i***t knows that! If any Judge, "thinks otherwise", that judge, should be removed form the bench!
What country are you from?...[ "OH"...You are deemo'rat...tht explains quite a bit!]
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.