Even fellow Republicans are dissing her.
tomhoff24 wrote:
Even fellow Republicans are dissing her.
Please tell me these Republicans names. That way I can make sure to watch for them come e******n time. I feel confident that you can list those names easily.
TJKMO wrote:
I COME TO BEAR WITNESS TO THE T***H.
She distorted her story to lamely lay the trafficking story at Biden’s feet.
It backfired.
Now she in Disgrace.
How is she in disgrace? Because you and a few others inferred something she did not say?
The disgrace is all yours, and it multiplies each time you claim to bear witness to the t***h.
RascalRiley wrote:
She lied carefully. Not in the USA. Not on Biden’s watch.
YOU say she implied. Personally, I inferred no such thing. This is all on you and your mindset.
Her example was valid as showing what is going on daily because of Biden's open door policy, whether it is here or in Mexico, whether today, last week, last month, last year, or in Bush'w administration.
And YOU and T are focusing on her supposedly 'implied' comments while ignoring the situation on the border and all the myriad of lies Biden tells weekly, and were on full display last week in his speech.
Really pathetic, my friend. Perfect example of on the mote while ignoring the beam.
tomhoff24 wrote:
Even fellow Republicans are dissing her.
LOL! Another knob head who wants to raise cain about something made up and inconsequential while ignoring his favorite Fibber-In-Chief's gaffs and open-and-shut lies.
Liberty Tree wrote:
We get projection with almost your every post.
TJKMO wrote:
Then you don’t know what it means.
You get nothing like it from me.
OK, professor, what does it mean to project?
TJKMO wrote:
I COME TO BEAR WITNESS TO THE T***H.
Without proper attribution, you stole these words from Lord Jesus and claimed them as your own.
You have repeated this line
ad nauseam, like well over a hundred times.
You have turned the words of Jesus into a cliche, like a bumper sticker slogan,
and as this applies to you, it is meaningless.
It is difficult to tell whether you have committed plagiarism or blasphemy, but I would say both.
RandyBrian wrote:
YOU say she implied. Personally, I inferred no such thing. This is all on you and your mindset.
Her example was valid as showing what is going on daily because of Biden's open door policy, whether it is here or in Mexico, whether today, last week, last month, last year, or in Bush'w administration.
And YOU and T are focusing on her supposedly 'implied' comments while ignoring the situation on the border and all the myriad of lies Biden tells weekly, and were on full display last week in his speech.
Really pathetic, my friend. Perfect example of on the mote while ignoring the beam.
YOU say she implied. Personally, I inferred no su... (
show quote)
Sad that I can believe that you are defending a fabrication but then that is what I expect from someone who can ignore the that with which you disagree.
If a Dem had done the same thing, well you know much you would be trashing that.
TJKMO
Loc: Bicycle Heaven
TJKMO wrote:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/katie-britt-sotu-rebuttal-torched-republicans-1234983528/
There is NEVER DISGRACE IN THE T***H
On this forum you have repeatedly and thoroughly disgraced yourself.
Rolling Stone and the perils of confirmation biasThe magazine is guilty of journalistic malpractice.
TJKMO wrote:
Then you don’t know what it means.
You get nothing like it from me.
I COME TO BEAR WITNESS TO THE T***H.
Then stop being dishonest so often.
Shout it all you want - its obviously not true.
XXX
Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
Mrs Britt made herself the laughing stock of the comic universe. See the brilliant SNL send up by Scarlet Johanson if you don't believe me. Why do MAGA do so poorly with the counter attacks? They usually put forward people who are really awkward attackers! Is it because the only things that they propose that are popular are immigration and inflation.
RascalRiley wrote:
Sad that I can believe that you are defending a fabrication but then that is what I expect from someone who can ignore the that with which you disagree.
If a Dem had done the same thing, well you know much you would be trashing that.
Not at all, Rascal. I read what they say, from either side, and address it. Yes, I have, and likely will do so again, criticize implied statements if the implication is not true. But I do NOT call it a lie or a fabrication when they do not open STATE a lie or fabrication.
Again, I did not make the assumption that she was saying the event happened recently, or in the USA, or under Biden's watch. And AGAIN, you continue to harp on a minor point with no real significance ALL FOR THE PURPOSE of calling her a liar. Yet you ignore all the massive outright lies told by Biden.
Hypocrisy has found a happy home in your heart, Rascal.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.