federally indicted mattoid wrote:
Sounds like Rs are preparing to fund Ukraine's needs as of today, 3/14/24.
Let's hope!!
Not at all.....preparing to bolster the Democrats failed economy by falsely propping it up by once again under the guise of funding Ukraine...... call it what it is.....taxpayers funding a Democrats stimulus package.
95% of that money stays here funding the weapons production paid for with that money...... then the Democrats give them away for the proxy wars they have grown to love.
Duh!!
JFlorio wrote:
That’s what I said you dumba**. The Senate never took it up. Which means the Republicans did pass a border bill. You call the Senate Bill by partisan because 4, count ‘em, RINO’s v**ed for it. That’s not by partisan in my book. So I am 100% correct and you’re too damn dumb to admit it. Of course Trump was against that Bill. Like most Americans because it did not secure the border. Now your preferred I***t in Chief is wanting to take In Haitians, and you fools worry about Trump.
"The border bill was sent to the Senate. Look it up."
"The Senate never took it up. Which means the Republicans did pass a border bill."
The House bill 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒍𝒂𝒔𝒕 𝑴𝒂𝒚 never made it out of subcommittee in the Senate. People have basically forgotten about it, and it went nowhere because it didn't have a snowflake's chance in hell in the Senate. But, here's the thing: you and I BOTH know 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒘𝒂𝒔𝒏'𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 in my post! I was quite specific that I was talking about Langford's bill that had been all over the news 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒑𝒂𝒔𝒕 𝑭𝒆𝒃𝒓𝒖𝒂𝒓𝒚, and was v**ed on. Good try at obfuscation, though! Love watching you twist like a pretzel with this one.
IMO, you just got the two bills mixed up but would never, will never, admit it. (Like Mr. Trump, you are never wrong.)
Btw, "dumba**, "bi-partisan" refers to the fact that 𝒊𝒕 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒘𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒏 𝒃𝒚 𝒃𝒐𝒕𝒉 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑫𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒄𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒔. That's what the term historically refers to, and always has. It has nothing to do with who eventually v**ed for it, and I think 𝒚𝒐𝒖'𝒓𝒆 just playing stupid here and actually know better. Surely, you know what the term means.
And I truly believe that many more Repubs would have v**ed for it had Trump not told them not to - and of course Trump now owns the GOP lock, stock, & barrel. Very few will not submit to the will of Dear Leader.
There you go again dumba**. You admit it went to the Senate. I know you were talking about pussy Langford’s Bill. He got three other Republicans to go along. I’m glad Trump was against this joke of a Bill. You’re just not very bright.
dwp66 wrote:
"The border bill was sent to the Senate. Look it up."
"The Senate never took it up. Which means the Republicans did pass a border bill."
The House bill 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒍𝒂𝒔𝒕 𝑴𝒂𝒚 never made it out of subcommittee in the Senate. People have basically forgotten about it, and it went nowhere because it didn't have a snowflake's chance in hell in the Senate. But, here's the thing: you and I BOTH know 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒘𝒂𝒔𝒏'𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 in my post! I was quite specific that I was talking about Langford's bill that had been all over the news 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒑𝒂𝒔𝒕 𝑭𝒆𝒃𝒓𝒖𝒂𝒓𝒚, and was v**ed on. Good try at obfuscation, though! Love watching you twist like a pretzel with this one.
IMO, you just got the two bills mixed up but would never, will never, admit it. (Like Mr. Trump, you are never wrong.)
Btw, "dumba**, "bi-partisan" refers to the fact that 𝒊𝒕 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒘𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒏 𝒃𝒚 𝒃𝒐𝒕𝒉 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑫𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒄𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒔. That's what the term historically refers to, and always has. It has nothing to do with who eventually v**ed for it, and I think 𝒚𝒐𝒖'𝒓𝒆 just playing stupid here and actually know better. Surely, you know what the term means.
And I truly believe that many more Repubs would have v**ed for it had Trump not told them not to - and of course Trump now owns the GOP lock, stock, & barrel. Very few will not submit to the will of Dear Leader.
"The border bill was sent to the Senate. Look... (
show quote)
JFlorio wrote:
There you go again dumba**. You admit it went to the Senate. I know you were talking about pussy Langford’s Bill. He got three other Republicans to go along. I’m glad Trump was against this joke of a Bill. You’re just not very bright.
It isn't she isn't bright - just dishonest.
JFlorio wrote:
There you go again dumba**. You admit it went to the Senate. I know you were talking about pussy Langford’s Bill. He got three other Republicans to go along. I’m glad Trump was against this joke of a Bill. You’re just not very bright.
"You admit it went to the Senate." Yeah, just not the bill I was talking about, which originated there! HaHaHa!
You talk out of both sides of your mouth, Florio, and you also manage to put your foot in it.
I doubt you could carry on a cogent conversation if your life literally depended on it.
Nice try dumba**. My point was there was already a Bill the Senate could have passed
If they really wanted to secure the border. Didn’t need a Senate Bill. You’re just plain dumb.
dwp66 wrote:
"You admit it went to the Senate." Yeah, just not the bill I was talking about, which originated there! HaHaHa!
You talk out of both sides of your mouth, Florio, and you also manage to put your foot in it.
I doubt you could carry on a cogent conversation if your life literally depended on it.
I admire your ad-hominin remark abilities - it's the last refuge of people with no other defenses.
dwp66 wrote:
I admire your ad-hominin remark abilities - it's the last refuge of people with no other defenses.
You just can’t admit the Republicans had put forth a bill that secured the border. That’s exactly what I said. You’re a dishonest POS.
Unintended Consequences wrote:
"President Biden has been largely critical of the border wall, instead pushing for billions of dollars for other types of security measures, including more agents and security technology between ports of entry."
So why did Republicans in the House v**e against a border bill? Answer: so that Trump and Repiblicans could use it as a campaign issue. Yeah, you really care about the American people.
Maybe because the "Border Bill" contained mostly money for Ukraine and assorted Liberal pork barrel projects rather than Border Security? Why did Democrats call it a Border Bill when most of the money went somewhere else?
Maybe they thought that allowing tens of thousands of wetbacks into this country every month was not a good idea?
pescado rojo wrote:
Maybe because the "Border Bill" contained mostly money for Ukraine and assorted Liberal pork barrel projects rather than Border Security? Why did Democrats call it a Border Bill when most of the money went somewhere else?
Maybe they thought that allowing tens of thousands of wetbacks into this country every month was not a good idea?
You know why they called it a border bill, because many Americans won’t research beyond the title of the Bill.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.