maitreya wrote:
This would be interesting if it were produced by something other than a bunch of politically-motivated hacks. I know the site leans to the right, but that doesn't make it wrong all the time or right all the time. It would also be nice if it accurately reflected my thoughts in any way. How could it, you are a Marxist/democrat supporter of the usurper. With some notable exceptions, I agree with Eisenhower's domestic policy, (so do I, some of them. Particularly the military/industrial complex, which is what Obama has proven quite adept at using to his personal benefit as have the other past Marxist/democrat and Republican regimes. No innocence from either party and that has led to the best government corporate America can buy.) apparently make me a radical l*****t, C****e-loving, useful i***t. You may be all of those, if so you will get yours at the hands of your mentors, you know the useful i***ts are the first to go in Marxist regimes.Much like Eisenhower, I suppose.
I assure you sir, I and my peers are not lacking in logic or virtue. I would suggest just lacking in common sense. If you think that American Thinker is the height of good judgement and sound scholarship, you are mistaken. It is a rag, created by people with an ulterior motive. No different from the Marxist drivel you apparently like to read. Don't believe me? Google "techniques of disinformation" and peruse a few of the articles.At a quick glance I would suggest all of this site read at your suggested links. There's good info to be gleaned, although I have been aware of some of the techniques used for quit a while. I believe very little of what I read unless I can find creditable sources to back up what was said. Study them carefully, and then read such sites with a critical eye. I read all sites with a critical eye, even the left leaning sites. Someone is bulls**tting you, and its not me. But you're trying.
This would be interesting if it were produced by s... (
show quote)