What do the homos think of this? Remember how Obama attended Rev. Wright's church for decades? Black theology is firmly against homosexuality. Remember how Obama was against gay...

Voice of Reason Loc: Earth

Remember how Obama attended Rev. Wright's church for decades? Black theology is firmly against homosexuality.

Remember how Obama was against gay marriage until he needed the gay v**e in the last e******n, then he didn't flip-flop, he evolved?

What if he lied?

What if gay marriage is a way for the government to keep a database on all known gays for future roundup?

dennisimoto Loc: Washington State (West)

Voice of Reason wrote:

Remember how Obama attended Rev. Wright's church for decades? Black theology is firmly against homosexuality.

Remember how Obama was against gay marriage until he needed the gay v**e in the last e******n, then he didn't flip-flop, he evolved?

What if he lied?

What if gay marriage is a way for the government to keep a database on all known gays for future roundup?

Like gun registration?

Grugore

Voice of Reason wrote:

Remember how Obama attended Rev. Wright's church for decades? Black theology is firmly against homosexuality.

Remember how Obama was against gay marriage until he needed the gay v**e in the last e******n, then he didn't flip-flop, he evolved?

What if he lied?

What if gay marriage is a way for the government to keep a database on all known gays for future roundup?

They're in for a rude awakening when the Muzzies take over. You might say say they'll lose their heads over it.

:XD: :thumbup: :mrgreen:

jimahrens Loc: California

While they keep molesting young boys There a bunch of P*******es. Many people believe Obama is Gay.

Voice of Reason wrote:

Remember how Obama attended Rev. Wright's church for decades? Black theology is firmly against homosexuality.

Remember how Obama was against gay marriage until he needed the gay v**e in the last e******n, then he didn't flip-flop, he evolved?

What if he lied?

What if gay marriage is a way for the government to keep a database on all known gays for future roundup?

Constitutional libertarian Loc: St Croix National Scenic River Way

jimahrens wrote:

While they keep molesting young boys There a bunch of P*******es. Many people believe Obama is Gay.

We're gojng to give you free stuff, green cards, drivers licenses, earned child tax credits and all you have to do in return is sign up for all this cool stuff.

Of course we will now know everything there is to know about you and when we are done using you we will put you on a one way bus across the border.

Voice of Reason Loc: Earth

dennisimoto wrote:

Like gun registration?

Kinda sorta. With gun registration it would be illegal to own a gun without registering it.

With gay marriage, it's not illegal for gays who don't want to get married to self-report, but there will of course be records of those who do.

Voice of Reason Loc: Earth

Constitutional libertarian wrote:

We're gojng to give you free stuff, green cards, drivers licenses, earned child tax credits and all you have to do in return is sign up for all this cool stuff.

Of course we will now know everything there is to know about you and when we are done using you we will put you on a one way bus across the border.

Usually totalitarian regimes don't deport the no-longer-useful i***ts, they exterminate them.

PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco

Voice of Reason wrote:

Remember how Obama attended Rev. Wright's church for decades? Black theology is firmly against homosexuality.

Remember how Obama was against gay marriage until he needed the gay v**e in the last e******n, then he didn't flip-flop, he evolved?

What if he lied?

What if gay marriage is a way for the government to keep a database on all known gays for future roundup?

Oh lordy! What a sad, paranoid, conspiratorial viewpoint you hold!

A) Don't you know that the government doesn't need marriage e******y to keep track of any group at all? Witness J. Edgar Hoovers voluminous files on homosexuals, purported c*******ts, etc.

B) If your theory applies then the government already has the ability to identify/manipulate/keep a database about many, many groups based on any number of licenses, registrations, etc.

C) There are many logical reasons why Obama's position has evolved. As a politician, I would expect political expedience was paramount (yes, I can be a little cynical too), but like all unknowns, deeper understanding of the issue over time can change attitudes. Unless of course if one is so pigheadedly mired in the past that new understanding is completely impossible. Growth is largely up to the individual's being open to it.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

Voice of Reason wrote:

Remember how Obama attended Rev. Wright's church for decades? Black theology is firmly against homosexuality.

Remember how Obama was against gay marriage until he needed the gay v**e in the last e******n, then he didn't flip-flop, he evolved?

What if he lied?

What if gay marriage is a way for the government to keep a database on all known gays for future roundup?

Why would the government want to do that? Take away guns so that the subjects cannot fight back makes sense, but to have a list of homosexuals would be of no use, would it. The Muslims would be able to behead homosexuals, or throw them off tall buildings to see if they could fly, without having a list. Since apparently children of either sex are considered fair game for Muslim men it would be only adult homosexuals that they would want to behead, but most of them are infidels anyhow, so they would be on the beheading list anyhow. Someone can't be beheaded twice it would be pointless. Homosexuals would not even be of value for blackmail purposes since same sex behavior is being promoted worldwide as an honorable behavior, and what the Christian God says doesn't count anyhow.

Voice of Reason Loc: Earth

PaulPisces wrote:

Oh lordy! What a sad, paranoid, conspiratorial viewpoint you hold!

I don't necessarily believe it, it's just a thought I had and wanted to see what others thought. I think that's what message boards like this are for, aren't they?

Or perhaps you view them differently? Maybe as a place to spread progressive liberal propaganda as opposed to discussing issues with others?

Also, while I'm sure you're sure Obama would never do anything against gays, what if a Republican becomes president?

PaulPisces wrote:

...Growth is largely up to the individual's being open to it.

So if you're not open to them, malignant tumors won't grow and k**l you?

Before you get your panties in too much of a bunch, I'm not comparing gays to cancer, just pointing out the senselessness of your statement.

PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco

Voice of Reason wrote:

So if you're not open to them, malignant tumors won't grow and k**l you?

Before you get your panties in too much of a bunch, I'm not comparing gays to cancer, just pointing out the senselessness of your statement.

My apologies Voice. I jumped the gun in thinking you held this viewpoint. I should have said "What a sad......this idea represents."

And I think you have misunderstood my comments about growth and understanding. Ideas evolve and can change with new understanding (i.e. no one today thinks the world is flat, most people in the west no longer view women as chattel, etc.) And as to tumors, those are biological phenomena, not ideas about social structure and relationships. I find your analogy faulty.

Voice of Reason Loc: Earth

PaulPisces wrote:

My apologies Voice. I jumped the gun in thinking you held this viewpoint. I should have said "What a sad......this idea represents."

No problem. If you'd worded it like that I might have agreed, although I prefer to think of it as cynicism.

PaulPisces wrote:

And I think you have misunderstood my comments about growth and understanding. Ideas evolve and can change with new understanding (i.e. no one today thinks the world is flat, most people in the west no longer view women as chattel, etc.) And as to tumors, those are biological phenomena, not ideas about social structure and relationships. I find your analogy faulty.

You're right, my analogy was faulty, but then again so was your first example (flat earth), but I get your drift. So then the question becomes, in the vein you meant, what growth is good?

I think the fact that most of society has grown, so that it no longer views gay bashing as okay, is good.

I think the fact that most of society has grown so that gays no longer have to hide their preference for fear of harm (be it physical, emotional, financial or wh**ever), is good.

I think the fact that most of society has grown so that free speech is suspended for fear of offending somebody, is bad.

I think the fact that most of society has grown so that the gay mafia is able to punish people (be it physical, emotional, financial or wh**ever) for expressing viewpoints differing from their agenda, is bad.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

Voice of Reason wrote:

You're right, my analogy was faulty, but then agai... (show quote)

Great thoughts and I agree with all of them. It is the activists that I have been fighting for years, not individual homosexual people. The "Gay Mafia" is a term that has been used before and is exceptionally accurate.

InvincibleEagle Loc: North central OH.

PaulPisces wrote:

Oh lordy! What a sad, paranoid, conspiratorial v... (show quote)

The answer to C) is; grandstanding to the fringe base v**ers.

Voice of Reason Loc: Earth

no propaganda please wrote:

Great thoughts and I agree with all of them. It is the activists that I have been fighting for years, not individual homosexual people. The "Gay Mafia" is a term that has been used before and is exceptionally accurate.

Thanks.

I'd never had anything against gays or gay activists for most of my life. I still have nothing against regular people who are gay, but there was an incident several years ago at my workplace which changed my opinion of the gay activists and their agenda forever.

My workplace was a large organization which published a daily 'newspaper' that was sent to all employees each day via email. One day there was a story in there titled, "Heterosexism at (workplace name)?" The story then went on to accuse all non-gay employees of being insensitive to gays and stated that employees should not assume co-workers are heterosexual. It ended by admonishing all married employees (this was before gay marriage was commonplace) that they should refrain from mentioning their families to their co-workers, even heterosexual married co-workers with families of their own, because a gay employee may overhear and "become depressed and unproductive".

At that moment I realized just how evil gay activists and their agenda are.