Nuclearian Loc: I live in a Fascist, Liberal State

In 1973 seven unelected men who sat on the Supreme Court of the United States of America cast their v**es that resulted in the deaths of 50 million (maybe more) unborn babies. How would you like to stand before God after that v**e and the ensuing bloodshed? The seven would be right up there with Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, and Mao Tse Tung, and they would be at the head of the line.

Hundreds of millions of Americans were bound by the decision of those seven people, and the babies in the womb did not have the means to speak against their own genocide. Since then, the belief patterns of people over the issue of a******n have changed, much of it because of images of babies growing in utero. We now have a window in the womb.

It’s similar to Dr. William Beaumont, the Army surgeon stationed at Fort Mackinac, Michigan, who in 1822 treated Alexis St. Martin who had received a gunshot womb to the stomach area. The hole could not be closed. It was that hole that enabled Dr. Beaumont to study how the stomach works. It’s a fascinating story. I remember hearing the story when I was 12 years old and our family vacationed in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and we took a day trip to Mackinac Island.

We’re about to go through the process again because the Supreme Court is going to take up the same-sex marriage issue.

The Supreme Court is without a moral rudder. Some on the court may rule in terms of “natural law,” even though Darwinism sank that ship in 1859 when Darwin published On the Origin of Species. Others will rule in terms of their own moral logic. Again, there is no way to account for any kind of morality given the naturalistic and materialistic starting points of today’s judicial theater.

The v**e will most likely be 5 to 4 in favor of same-sex marriage. The person making the deciding v**e will weigh the consequences. He or she (mostly likely he) will choose to be vilified by the opponents of same-sex marriage since they do not hold positions of authority and power in the United States. Those cocktail parties are important as are legacy issues. Who will be writing their obituaries for the mainstream media?

Just think, “in 1986, the court upheld Georgia’s anti-sodomy law in a devastating defeat for gay rights advocates.”

At the very least, states should be making this decision.

God will nowhere be referenced even though pro-homosexuals try to make Him one of their biggest supporters. Better to leave Him out than have people on the other side try to make a case against same-sex marriage by quoting Scripture and citing biology.

There's certainly nothing in the Constitution about marriage, just like there's nothing about murder, rape, stealing, or any number of moral wrongs. the Constitution rests on the premise that there is a law above our laws.

Don’t think the pro-same-sex marriage decision will stop with that decision. Next up will be the polygamists with those pushing for p********a and incest. With no moral foundation to oppose same-sex marriage available to the courts, these three dominoes are sure to fall or at least be pursued vigorously by their advocates.

Germany is already contemplating legalizing incest:

“It may not be ‘good’ for the family, but a German ethics panel said incest should still be legal.

“NBC News cites a new report by the German government's Ethics Council recommending the decriminalization of sex between adult siblings.

“‘The majority of the German Ethics Council believes that it is not appropriate for a criminal law to preserve a social taboo,’ Dr. Michael Wunder, a psychotherapist and member of the council, told NBC News. ‘But the ethics council does not recommend decriminalizing sex between parents and children.’”

Not to be outdone, there’s an article in New York Magazine about a father and daughter who want to marry and have children together. It may be a h**x, but there is nothing morally illogical about it given today’s ethical free-for-all. All any opponent could say is, “It’s yucky.” Any deformed children could easily be aborted since the court has already made that legal.

See how easy moral atheism is. There’s always a solution.

There will be long-term consequences if the court decides to uphold lower courts ruling against state legislatures on this issue. There will certainly be more suits against people who refuse to acknowledge same-sex marriage. Pandora's Box couldn't be any more threatening.

Caboose Loc: South Carolina

************************************************
Its a shame that some of these people that have done all these
montsteroes things cant go to hell but once. Its my understanding that after the great white throne judgement, hell
will be no more and there will be a lake of fire and brimstone.
I dont have a full understanding of this but Im sure our Lord
knows exactly what hes doing with them.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

I agree that the decision will probably be 5-4 in favor of same-sex marriage, and I expect to be totally disgusted by a court decision once again. Where did this idea come from that there is a constitutional right for gays to get married? Maybe I'm just getting more old school as I get older, but I can't understand this bandwagon phenomenon where same-sex marriage is becoming more acceptable all the time. I'm not in favor of any kind of discrimination against gays except when it comes to the right for them to get married. As the writer pointed out, where does this end?

Caboose Loc: South Carolina

Good Post !

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

Whose, mine or his?

MrEd Loc: Georgia

What really burns me up is the fact that the Supreme Court has no authority to even hear these cases, let alone make a judgement on them. They are restricted by the Constitution as to what they can do and there is NOTHING in the Constitution that gives them authority over these issues. These are simply State rights, or the people. (10th amendment)

Everything they have done on these issues is unconstitutional and should be thrown out. They also don't have a right to hear ANYTHING pertaining to religion. Maybe we should make it a test to see if they can even read the Constitution before we appoint them. You might want to get them a dictionary and maybe some law books too, since they can't seem to get much of anything right these days.

What gets me is these people are given all this in school, but it would seem that the only thing they use their education for is finding ways around the Constitution.

One thing I would REALLY like to know is, who told them they could use themselves as an authority when making a judgement??????

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

They actually do have the authority to hear the case because it involves conflicts between the decisions of different states, e.g., one state's recognizing a same-sex marriage which is not recognized by another state. It also has nothing to do with religion. Sorry to correct you, but I hope they rule against the right to same-sex marriage. Not holding my breath, however.

PeterS

If you want preachers for SC judges then elect president with that mandate. If you don't keep electing the i***ts that you do...

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

We are seeing many of the results created by the mindset instilled by our education system. Be wh**ever you want to be, with total disregard for the status-qua. Every individual wacko running the streets has more laws protecting their various bazaar behaviors than you and I. They have all the rights granted the main stream populace plus all the special interest protection laws that perpetuate their a******l wants, needs and behavior. America has turned into an open freak parade that used to cost 10 cents to view in circus side shows. The tiniest number of our society has been given keys to the city while main street loses it's rights to build what they desire. Not much of which infringes on others. That used to be offered through sate and local governments. Now Fed over reach forces a one size fits all common national community. We used to be family first, community second, state third, and federal fourth when called upon. Over reach has intruded on every ones life so quickly that it escapes most people.

Remember the days you could pick your living environment based on personal desires and select the best suited locale to settle in ? Back when communities had the right to steer themselves based on majority wants and needs. Well I hope you do because that is gone forever. We have allowed our legislature to hog tie the entire nation with law after law negating individual rights and forcing all to live under national not state/local day to day guidelines. By the way. That 10 cents you once payed for freak shows is now free and available to watch 24/7 on any street nation wide.

Nuclearian Loc: I live in a Fascist, Liberal State

The ONLY i***ts would be those that hold that Gay Marriage is legal. It IS unconstitutional. Even though America is mostly godless today, due to liberal indoctrination in the schools, the founding fathers say that Judeo Christian religion is the moral basis for rights in this country. They intended MAN and WOMAN.

Caboose Loc: South Carolina

I was speaking to nuclearian.....sorry.

But yours was good too LAPhil. I hope the q***rs (all 2%) never
are legalized.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

Gay marriage itself would not be unconstitutional because there is nothing in the Constitution which forbids it. However neither is it unconstitutional for a state not to allow it IMO, because there is no mention of marriage in the Constitution, and therefore the states have the power to decide for themselves. This is what the Court is going to have to decide.

shipfitter Loc: Wisconsin, for now

Ironic as to how the Majority Voice has been Silenced !!! ??? What ever happened to V****G on The Issues ???

Caboose Loc: South Carolina

Those federal judges that ruled against a number of states, having
anti q***r laws, are dead wrong. Its obvious they were in a conspiracy against the states and for obama. They want the 2%,or less, q***rs to control the other 98%. The tail wagging the dog. We need a good Judge hangin.

Sicilianthing

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

How many

F*GGOT

T*****r

ClownsInGowns are on the bench now ?