One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump's mental decline
Page <<first <prev 17 of 26 next> last>>
Mar 1, 2024 07:57:39   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
RascalRiley wrote:
Only cult members have integrity. /s


I want to know because I'm not a Colton. Member never have been never will be, perhaps you can tell me

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 09:10:09   #
Justice101
 
Big Kahuna wrote:
I already know how 3 female l*****t justices will v**e even before they hear the case and all the facts. Sotomayor, Kegan and "I don't know what a woman is", Kunttanji Brown, will v**e against Trump. 3 justices will v**e for Trump and 3 will be a toss up. I say Trump wins his case by a narrow v**e of 5-4 while Trump should win 9-0 if we had a fair Supreme Court.


Do you feel that way for BOTH cases?

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 09:25:37   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
Big Kahuna wrote:
I already know how 3 female l*****t justices will v**e even before they hear the case and all the facts. Sotomayor, Kegan and "I don't know what a woman is", Kunttanji Brown, will v**e against Trump. 3 justices will v**e for Trump and 3 will be a toss up. I say Trump wins his case by a narrow v**e of 5-4 while Trump should win 9-0 if we had a fair Supreme Court.

Trump should win 9-0 if we had a fair Supreme Court.

If the Supreme Court was fair Trump and all future presidents should have total immunity for wh**ever they do in office?

Do you think that include ordering the assassination of political opponents?

Former President Donald Trump's attorney on January 9th. argued that a president could order the assassination of his political rival and couldn't be prosecuted for it β€” unless Congress impeached and convicted that commander in chief first.

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2024 09:36:55   #
Big dog
 
Knightlady wrote:
We could just disqualify the entire states v**es and count from what's left


πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 10:01:46   #
Big Kahuna
 
RascalRiley wrote:
Trump should win 9-0 if we had a fair Supreme Court.

If the Supreme Court was fair Trump and all future presidents should have total immunity for wh**ever they do in office?

Do you think that include ordering the assassination of political opponents?

Former President Donald Trump's attorney on January 9th. argued that a president could order the assassination of his political rival and couldn't be prosecuted for it β€” unless Congress impeached and convicted that commander in chief first.
i Trump should win 9-0 if we had a fair Supreme C... (show quote)

Well think about this. Bathhouse Barry made no qualms about his dislike for Benjamin Netanyahu and even blatantly interfered in the Israeli e******ns by backing his opponent and some say by even donating big time money to Bibi's opponent. If we are to start criminalizing Presidents who interfere with other country's e******ns and even come close to sticking our corrupt CIA on those leaders that the U.S. president despises, let's start with the trial of Bathhouse Boy and make him the poster boy of why we should not allow our presidents to have full immunity from their treacherous decisions. If on the other hand, Presidents have full immunity, then Bathhouse boy can be let off the hook for his devious acts. If Sotomayor, Kegan and Kunttanji v**e that the President does not have full immunity then let's d**g Bathhouse Barry back to D. C. (Where he is still undermining Trump), and fry his black l*****t a$$ real good.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 10:06:30   #
Big Kahuna
 
Justice101 wrote:
Do you feel that way for BOTH cases?


Your guess is as good as mine. Trump, in all reality, should win any Supreme Court decision on any of the flimsy attempts by the demorats to try and keep him from winning the Presidency in 2024. E******n i**********e is the demorats game card that they are playing big time.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 10:09:18   #
son of witless
 
slatten49 wrote:
I, too, am okay with your antics. Having read your posts/comments for over 10 years, I am continually reminded of the saying about how a pigeon plays chess. Debating/arguing with you is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter the level of his defeat, the bird is going to s**t on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

Sort'a like Trump's refusal to accept his loss in 2020.


You project your actions onto me. I am not the pigeon. You are the one who never addresses my legitimate moves on the chess board, aka my stating Joe's real failures. Now unlike you I can specifically address your comment, " Sort'a like Trump's refusal to accept his loss in 2020. [/quote] "

I acknowledge that Donald J. Trump's actions were doomed to failure. I do not acknowledge that there were no questionable tactics by Democrats in that e******n, but Trump had no chance even with the Democrat misdeeds of changing the e******n results.

Now as far as someone not accepting e******n results, need I remind you of Hillary's non acceptance in 2016, and Al Gore's non acceptance in 2,000.

You see, this is how it's done. You address the actual words of the person you are speaking with. No gaslighting. No s**tting on the chess board and knocking over the pieces. You are one of the reasons these debates on OPP have become so stupid.

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2024 10:20:19   #
Big Kahuna
 
son of witless wrote:
"

I acknowledge that Donald J. Trump's actions were doomed to failure. I do not acknowledge that there were no questionable tactics by Democrats in that e******n, but Trump had no chance even with the Democrat misdeeds of changing the e******n results.

Now as far as someone not accepting e******n results, need I remind you of Hillary's non acceptance in 2016, and Al Gore's non acceptance in 2,000.

You see, this is how it's done. You address the actual words of the person you are speaking with. No gaslighting. No s**tting on the chess board and knocking over the pieces. You are one of the reasons these debates on OPP have become so stupid.
" br br I acknowledge that Donald J. Trump'... (show quote)


I h**e to say this but Slats, in spite of his grandiose ego, has become one very stupid former Vet who fought for the U S against the c*******ts but now endorses a marxist demorat regime and is oblivious to his short sightedness. It is sad to see him self-implode and go off the rails but it is his own choosing.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 10:48:44   #
Big dog
 
Big Kahuna wrote:
Well think about this. Bathhouse Barry made no qualms about his dislike for Benjamin Netanyahu and even blatantly interfered in the Israeli e******ns by backing his opponent and some say by even donating big time money to Bibi's opponent. If we are to start criminalizing Presidents who interfere with other country's e******ns and even come close to sticking our corrupt CIA on those leaders that the U.S. president despises, let's start with the trial of Bathhouse Boy and make him the poster boy of why we should not allow our presidents to have full immunity from their treacherous decisions. If on the other hand, Presidents have full immunity, then Bathhouse boy can be let off the hook for his devious acts. If Sotomayor, Kegan and Kunttanji v**e that the President does not have full immunity then let's d**g Bathhouse Barry back to D. C. (Where he is still undermining Trump), and fry his black l*****t a$$ real good.
Well think about this. Bathhouse Barry made no qua... (show quote)

Amen !!!!!

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 11:23:16   #
son of witless
 
Big Kahuna wrote:
I h**e to say this but Slats, in spite of his grandiose ego, has become one very stupid former Vet who fought for the U S against the c*******ts but now endorses a marxist demorat regime and is oblivious to his short sightedness. It is sad to see him self-implode and go off the rails but it is his own choosing.


I know the type. I am not a Veteran which puts me at a moral disadvantage when arguing with those who believe they can get away with anything because they are Veterans. They do not start out as L*****ts, but if you follow them you can see them evolve.

I used to try to post on this one board run by a former Navy guy. I think he was a former Petty Officer. By the time I found his site he was quite authoritarian. I went back several years on the history of his site, and found he was pretty neutral politically in the beginning. Then a year or so in you could see the t***sformation slowly build.

I believe something must have occurred that angered him and he became a full blown Left Wing Republican h**er. He would post some far left issue and if you tried to disagree, he would delete you. Soon the only posts answering his were from ardent ass kissers. I would try to see how far I could get by innocently questioning his statements before he would delete me.

He imagined that he could make living as a blogger, but it wasn't going real well because he was always complaining about the various social media screwing him over, and he constantly asked his ass kissers for donations and he would give them custom pens he made. Unfortunately his sycophants were either poor or cheap and did not meet his financial needs. I can't even remember what he called himself.

I can only speculate that Slats had some experience that really angered him, and turned him on his current path. I know a few older Vets, and once they get pissed about something, it is forever.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 12:19:07   #
Big Kahuna
 
son of witless wrote:
I know the type. I am not a Veteran which puts me at a moral disadvantage when arguing with those who believe they can get away with anything because they are Veterans. They do not start out as L*****ts, but if you follow them you can see them evolve.

I used to try to post on this one board run by a former Navy guy. I think he was a former Petty Officer. By the time I found his site he was quite authoritarian. I went back several years on the history of his site, and found he was pretty neutral politically in the beginning. Then a year or so in you could see the t***sformation slowly build.

I believe something must have occurred that angered him and he became a full blown Left Wing Republican h**er. He would post some far left issue and if you tried to disagree, he would delete you. Soon the only posts answering his were from ardent ass kissers. I would try to see how far I could get by innocently questioning his statements before he would delete me.

He imagined that he could make living as a blogger, but it wasn't going real well because he was always complaining about the various social media screwing him over, and he constantly asked his ass kissers for donations and he would give them custom pens he made. Unfortunately his sycophants were either poor or cheap and did not meet his financial needs. I can't even remember what he called himself.

I can only speculate that Slats had some experience that really angered him, and turned him on his current path. I know a few older Vets, and once they get pissed about something, it is forever.
I know the type. I am not a Veteran which puts me ... (show quote)


I think slats's t***sformation to a l*****t was when he was not allowed to use the woman's restroom and the rest was downhill as he blamed the Conservatives.

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2024 14:30:11   #
Radaghast
 
Just one Trump h**er's opinion. You know what they say about opinions...everyone has one.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 15:53:36   #
martsiva
 
slatten49 wrote:
Biden easily handled Trump in the 2020 debates and will undoubtedly do the same this coming Fall.


Oh I definitely want to see Biden debate Trump!!I want to see Biden debate Trump on the border crisis and why Biden didn`t close the border!! I want to see them debate why Biden supports censorship of free speech!! I want to see them debate why Biden thinks i******s should be housed before our own homeless!! These are just for starters!! Biden doesn`t have a chance!!

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 16:06:51   #
Knightlady
 
martsiva wrote:
Oh I definitely want to see Biden debate Trump!!I want to see Biden debate Trump on the border crisis and why Biden didn`t close the border!! I want to see them debate why Biden supports censorship of free speech!! I want to see them debate why Biden thinks i******s should be housed before our own homeless!! These are just for starters!! Biden doesn`t have a chance!!


I would pay good money to see that. But didn't Biden say he refuses to debate Trump because he is a criminal?

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 16:15:01   #
Hydro
 
Knightlady wrote:
I would pay good money to see that. But didn't Biden say he refuses to debate Trump because he is a criminal?


I believe you are correct - what’s surprising is Biden finally coming clean - but I’m sure if he asks Trump - Trump will accept his confession and debate him in spite of Biden admitting he is a criminal

Reply
Page <<first <prev 17 of 26 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.