Law professor: First Amendment can be 'Achilles heel,' makes US 'particularly vulnerable to disinformation'
Feb 28, 2024 09:26:57 #
MSNBC legal analyst Barbara McQuade argued free speech 'can be limited as long as there is a compelling governmental interest'
https://www.foxnews.com/media/law-professor-first-amendment-can-achilles-heel-makes-us-particularly-vulnerable-disinformation
Another l*****t attempting to k**l free speech.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/law-professor-first-amendment-can-achilles-heel-makes-us-particularly-vulnerable-disinformation
Another l*****t attempting to k**l free speech.
Feb 28, 2024 11:07:09 #
American Vet wrote:
MSNBC legal analyst Barbara McQuade argued free speech 'can be limited as long as there is a compelling governmental interest'
https://www.foxnews.com/media/law-professor-first-amendment-can-achilles-heel-makes-us-particularly-vulnerable-disinformation
Another l*****t attempting to k**l free speech.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/law-professor-first-amendment-can-achilles-heel-makes-us-particularly-vulnerable-disinformation
Another l*****t attempting to k**l free speech.
Are any of the following protected by the first amendment?
1. Speech inciting a r**t
2. Conspiring to commit felonies before the fact
3. Speech that is likely to cause bodily harm or death.
4. Slander
5. Speech designed to defraud.
6. Lies to public officials and law enforcement.
7. Lies under oath.
8. Witness intimidation.
9. Jury tampering.
Feb 28, 2024 12:41:24 #
Kevyn wrote:
Are any of the following protected by the first amendment?
1. Speech inciting a r**t
2. Conspiring to commit felonies before the fact
3. Speech that is likely to cause bodily harm or death.
4. Slander
5. Speech designed to defraud.
6. Lies to public officials and law enforcement.
7. Lies under oath.
8. Witness intimidation.
9. Jury tampering.
1. Speech inciting a r**t
2. Conspiring to commit felonies before the fact
3. Speech that is likely to cause bodily harm or death.
4. Slander
5. Speech designed to defraud.
6. Lies to public officials and law enforcement.
7. Lies under oath.
8. Witness intimidation.
9. Jury tampering.
You obviously missed the "compelling governmental interest". Even a weak-minded extremist such as you should be able to recognize the danger.
Feb 28, 2024 12:57:53 #
American Vet wrote:
You obviously missed the "compelling governmental interest". Even a weak-minded extremist such as you should be able to recognize the danger.
Everything I listed is a compelling government interest. Are they protected by the first amendment free speech clause? Yes or no?
Feb 28, 2024 14:04:48 #
Kevyn wrote:
Everything I listed is a compelling government interest. Are they protected by the first amendment free speech clause? Yes or no?
But it is the ones that you DID NOT list and may potentially be "controlled" by the government. For instance - the ruling power may decide that speaking out against an unproven v*****e should be controlled. Or speech endorsing a particular candidate may be a 'compelling interest'.
As I said: You aren't bright enough to understand that.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.