One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The FBI screws up
Feb 21, 2024 15:05:31   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
An indicted FBI agent admitted that he received much of his information on President Biden's son from a Russian intelligent agent. This revelation puts much of the evidence against H****r B***n in the false column.

Reply
Feb 21, 2024 15:07:58   #
Liberty Tree
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
An indicted FBI agent admitted that he received much of his information on President Biden's son from a Russian intelligent agent. This revelation puts much of the evidence against H****r B***n in the false column.


You would not say that if it was about Trump. Then it would all be true.

Reply
Feb 21, 2024 15:18:16   #
BIRDMAN
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
An indicted FBI agent admitted that he received much of his information on President Biden's son from a Russian intelligent agent. This revelation puts much of the evidence against H****r B***n in the false column.


Why would a Russian intelligence agent be talking to the FBI

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2024 15:25:41   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
BIRDMAN wrote:
Why would a Russian intelligence agent be talking to the FBI


Birdman, It was the FBI that was talking to the Russians. Watch tonights news. There should be a lot more on this story.

Reply
Feb 21, 2024 15:52:18   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Birdman, It was the FBI that was talking to the Russians. Watch tonights news. There should be a lot more on this story.


So. The Felonious Blundering Imbeciles failed to check his background or a second source. They were too busy attending Latin Catholic mass looking for future terrorist.

Reply
Feb 21, 2024 16:07:57   #
BIRDMAN
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Birdman, It was the FBI that was talking to the Russians. Watch tonights news. There should be a lot more on this story.


Again why would a Russian talk to an American FBI agent. Maybe it’s the same one that said Trump colluded with Russia

Reply
Feb 21, 2024 17:17:44   #
American Vet
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
An indicted FBI agent admitted that he received much of his information on President Biden's son from a Russian intelligent agent. This revelation puts much of the evidence against H****r B***n in the false column.


COMMENTARY: More on FBI informant Smirnov that doesn’t add up

In breaking news Tuesday evening, Alexander Smirnov, the longtime FBI informant whose alleged lies relating to Biden bribery were immortalized in that “1023” is now being said by Special Counsel David Weiss to have ties with Russian intelligence. Those ties, he says, were “involved in passing a story about H****r B***n that has been critical to congressional Republicans’ efforts to investigate the first family.”

Actually, as we’ll get to below, it’s not so critical. But Democrats want us to believe it is. And mainstream media is running with the “Russia” theme. Note the headline on ABC NEWS…

https://abcnews.go.com/US/h****r-biden-informant-charged-lying-high-level-russian/story?id=107389985

The filing by Weiss sounds suspiciously like yet another of the intelligence community’s “Russian disinformation” tales: "Smirnov's efforts to spread misinformation about a candidate of one of the two major parties in the United States continues," the filing states. "What this shows is that the misinformation he is spreading is not confined to 2020. He is actively peddling new lies that could impact U.S. e******ns after meeting with Russian intelligence officials in November.”

Aside from the now-tired references to “Russian disinformation,” there’s something about this story that just isn’t right. For years, this individual was a highly-paid and utilized confidential human source (CHS) for the FBI. As recently as last summer, they were refusing to release the “1023” because, they claimed, it would compromise a valuable source. Did they still not know last summer that he had lied to them in 2017? About something so consequential?

House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer of Kentucky said, “When asked by the committee about their confidence in the confidential human source, the FBI told the committee the [CHS] was credible and trusted.” Smirnov, he said, “had worked with the FBI for over a decade and had been paid six figures.” Of course, Smirnov was also well aware that lying to a federal agent is against the law.

So, “Did Smirnov really lie about this or not?” is just the first of the questions we have. Why did the DOJ not charge Christopher Steele with the same crime, when he seemingly committed it with his “dossier” falsely tying Trump to Russia? And why did they wait years to charge Smirnov with lying, or even just to change their tune on the matter of his reliability?

We all understood when the “1023” story broke that the notes of an FBI agent in such a report constitute raw intelligence that still requires investigation and verification. Without that next step, it wasn’t solid evidence of the Biden family’s wrongdoing, yet the media and Democrats (same thing) are now talking as if all the evidence the committee has gathered had just gone away somehow. Au contraire. Plenty of evidence is there, mostly in the form of financial records and sworn testimony.

So...drop the impeachment inquiry? Are they kidding?

It’s easy to speculate, so let’s. Perhaps Smirnov used to be a trusted source but was found out by the Russians and c*********d somehow, made to pass along certain information. But why would Russia want him to pass along a story damaging to Biden, when we now have good reason to believe that Putin really did NOT want Trump in the White House due to his unpredictability. (Note: this is just the opposite of what our intelligence community was telling us.) Again, it doesn’t make sense.

FOX NEWS reports that Smirnov has been released from custody in Las Vegas after turning in his passport; he’s wearing an ankle monitor. If he disappears, the one way to find out if Burisma founder Mikola Zlochevsky really said he “paid $5 million to one Biden and $5 million to another Biden” is to hear it from Zlochevsky himself.

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2024 17:39:45   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Birdman, It was the FBI that was talking to the Russians. Watch tonights news. There should be a lot more on this story.


Correction, It was an FBI informant that got the info from a Russian intelligence source. That informant has been indicted.

Reply
Feb 21, 2024 17:51:37   #
BIRDMAN
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Correction, It was an FBI informant that got the info from a Russian intelligence source. That informant has been indicted.


Then for sure it’s legit



Reply
Feb 21, 2024 21:09:54   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
An indicted FBI agent admitted that he received much of his information on President Biden's son from a Russian intelligent agent. This revelation puts much of the evidence against H****r B***n in the false column.


***This revelation puts much of the evidence against H****r B***n in the false column.
>>>Why? His status as an agent doesn't mean his information is incorrect

Reply
Feb 21, 2024 21:23:51   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
An indicted FBI agent admitted that he received much of his information on President Biden's son from a Russian intelligent agent. This revelation puts much of the evidence against H****r B***n in the false column.


If the individual involved in this matter was Donald J. Trump, Jr. or Eric Trump, they would already be in jail. If for no other reason, H****r should be in jail in falsification of a Federal document, and violation of a gun law. If a single everyday individual had committed the same acts, they would have been in jail well before now.

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2024 22:05:55   #
Michael Roy Loc: North of Amarillo
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
An indicted FBI agent admitted that he received much of his information on President Biden's son from a Russian intelligent agent. This revelation puts much of the evidence against H****r B***n in the false column.


Your campaign to replace Kevyn as the biggest liar here seems to be headed for success. As of right now you have my v**e.

Reply
Feb 22, 2024 06:45:31   #
Big dog
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
An indicted FBI agent admitted that he received much of his information on President Biden's son from a Russian intelligent agent. This revelation puts much of the evidence against H****r B***n in the false column.


False? Don’t you know the t***h can be found in many places.

Reply
Feb 22, 2024 08:57:12   #
4522chief
 
Boy, the deep state will do anything to protect that corrupt i***t in the White House and his family. The next thing they will come up with is the informant was Trump wearing a disguise

Reply
Feb 22, 2024 11:52:45   #
Justice101
 
American Vet wrote:
COMMENTARY: More on FBI informant Smirnov that doesn’t add up

In breaking news Tuesday evening, Alexander Smirnov, the longtime FBI informant whose alleged lies relating to Biden bribery were immortalized in that “1023” is now being said by Special Counsel David Weiss to have ties with Russian intelligence. Those ties, he says, were “involved in passing a story about H****r B***n that has been critical to congressional Republicans’ efforts to investigate the first family.”

Actually, as we’ll get to below, it’s not so critical. But Democrats want us to believe it is. And mainstream media is running with the “Russia” theme. Note the headline on ABC NEWS…

https://abcnews.go.com/US/h****r-biden-informant-charged-lying-high-level-russian/story?id=107389985

The filing by Weiss sounds suspiciously like yet another of the intelligence community’s “Russian disinformation” tales: "Smirnov's efforts to spread misinformation about a candidate of one of the two major parties in the United States continues," the filing states. "What this shows is that the misinformation he is spreading is not confined to 2020. He is actively peddling new lies that could impact U.S. e******ns after meeting with Russian intelligence officials in November.”

Aside from the now-tired references to “Russian disinformation,” there’s something about this story that just isn’t right. For years, this individual was a highly-paid and utilized confidential human source (CHS) for the FBI. As recently as last summer, they were refusing to release the “1023” because, they claimed, it would compromise a valuable source. Did they still not know last summer that he had lied to them in 2017? About something so consequential?

House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer of Kentucky said, “When asked by the committee about their confidence in the confidential human source, the FBI told the committee the [CHS] was credible and trusted.” Smirnov, he said, “had worked with the FBI for over a decade and had been paid six figures.” Of course, Smirnov was also well aware that lying to a federal agent is against the law.

So, “Did Smirnov really lie about this or not?” is just the first of the questions we have. Why did the DOJ not charge Christopher Steele with the same crime, when he seemingly committed it with his “dossier” falsely tying Trump to Russia? And why did they wait years to charge Smirnov with lying, or even just to change their tune on the matter of his reliability?

We all understood when the “1023” story broke that the notes of an FBI agent in such a report constitute raw intelligence that still requires investigation and verification. Without that next step, it wasn’t solid evidence of the Biden family’s wrongdoing, yet the media and Democrats (same thing) are now talking as if all the evidence the committee has gathered had just gone away somehow. Au contraire. Plenty of evidence is there, mostly in the form of financial records and sworn testimony.

So...drop the impeachment inquiry? Are they kidding?

It’s easy to speculate, so let’s. Perhaps Smirnov used to be a trusted source but was found out by the Russians and c*********d somehow, made to pass along certain information. But why would Russia want him to pass along a story damaging to Biden, when we now have good reason to believe that Putin really did NOT want Trump in the White House due to his unpredictability. (Note: this is just the opposite of what our intelligence community was telling us.) Again, it doesn’t make sense.

FOX NEWS reports that Smirnov has been released from custody in Las Vegas after turning in his passport; he’s wearing an ankle monitor. If he disappears, the one way to find out if Burisma founder Mikola Zlochevsky really said he “paid $5 million to one Biden and $5 million to another Biden” is to hear it from Zlochevsky himself.
COMMENTARY: More on FBI informant Smirnov that doe... (show quote)


The GOP has over $30 Million reasons to continue the investigation and bank records don't lie.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.