The president does not have the authority to rewrite i*********n l*ws
Jan 16, 2015 08:07:21 #
Bigmac495
Loc: Indiana
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jan 16, 2015 08:08:17 #
moldyoldy wrote:
You might as well dig reagan up and put him on trial for amnesty too. Things sure were quieter on the right when he did it.
As for joe the fruitcake, he has been filing suits almost as much as orly taitz the birther queen, with same results. Frivilous, frivilous, stupid, waste of time.
As for joe the fruitcake, he has been filing suits almost as much as orly taitz the birther queen, with same results. Frivilous, frivilous, stupid, waste of time.
No... The Conservatives back in the Reagan Amnesty Era Were Vocal... But the Internet wasn't really that Interactive & the Mass Media Favored Amnesty, so, they Ignored We Conservatives WHICH IS WHY "... Things sure were quiter on the right when he did it..."
And We Conservatives have continually CRITICIZED PRES REAGAN FOR HIS AMNESTY ACTIONS... It's just like anything else in Life... OLD INJUSTICES AREN'T AS ADDRESSED AS CURRENT INJUSTICES ARE... Regardless of their IMPORTANCE...
Jan 16, 2015 08:10:33 #
Hemiman wrote:
Imagine what would happen if Sheriff Joe were pres.,the things he would with his pen and phone.
And, all liberals would be required to wear pink. :D
Jan 16, 2015 08:15:00 #
moldyoldy wrote:
You might as well dig reagan up and put him on trial for amnesty too. Things sure were quieter on the right when he did it.
As for joe the fruitcake, he has been filing suits almost as much as orly taitz the birther queen, with same results. Frivilous, frivilous, stupid, waste of time.
As for joe the fruitcake, he has been filing suits almost as much as orly taitz the birther queen, with same results. Frivilous, frivilous, stupid, waste of time.
And while we are at it we could try the lying Democrats for not securing the border as part of Reagan's Amnesty.
Jan 16, 2015 08:15:26 #
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jan 16, 2015 08:16:02 #
JimMe wrote:
No... The Conservatives back in the Reagan Amnesty... (show quote)
The t***h is conservative business owners, wanted cheap labor, and wanted to destroy unions, thereby destroying the middle class. Amnesty did that. Amnesty now will only increase the tax base, since these people have been here working for decades. This is only for parents with children born here.
Jan 16, 2015 08:56:52 #
moldyoldy wrote:
The t***h is conservative business owners, wanted cheap labor, and wanted to destroy unions, thereby destroying the middle class. Amnesty did that. Amnesty now will only increase the tax base, since these people have been here working for decades. This is only for parents with children born here.
**********
It's just the tip of a very, very ,very BIG ICEBERG.
Jan 16, 2015 09:01:19 #
Mom8052 wrote:
**********
It's just the tip of a very, very ,very BIG ICEBERG.
It's just the tip of a very, very ,very BIG ICEBERG.
Yes, you are probably right. But, like Europe, we are not having enough babies with both parents working to sustain us. We need new blood to keep the country going.
Jan 16, 2015 09:13:58 #
moldyoldy wrote:
Yes, you are probably right. But, like Europe, we are not having enough babies with both parents working to sustain us. We need new blood to keep the country going.
************
I ask you why we don't have enough babies with both parents working...................it's because (IT) has decided that with everything is free to mommies without hubby there to help, then there is no need for FAMILY VALUES. HUbby is on his own with his free stuff too. I*****l a***ns see this and want it also, they will like the tit of free stuff. (oh, by the way, the # of i******s in the shadows will end of being 300 million by the time it is all said and done.) New blood, will end up cost me and the other TAX PAYERS TRILLIONS!!!
Jan 16, 2015 09:32:32 #
Mom8052 wrote:
************ br I ask you why we don't have enough... (show quote)
Welfare is going down, now that more people are going back to work. That stereotype of the welfare mom is old and outdated. people with kids and working low paying jobs, which jncludes walmart workers and military families, and other minimum wage employees are the main recipiants of needed help.
Jan 16, 2015 09:38:21 #
moldyoldy wrote:
Welfare is going down, now that more people are going back to work. That stereotype of the welfare mom is old and outdated. people with kids and working low paying jobs, which jncludes walmart workers and military families, and other minimum wage employees are the main recipiants of needed help.
Moldy, you're so full of crap your eyes must be brown. Welfare spending is up, not down...thanks to Obama's economy. The rest of your absurd posting is just typical libtard bulls**t...your usual.
Jan 16, 2015 09:57:11 #
JMHO wrote:
Moldy, you're so full of crap your eyes must be brown. Welfare spending is up, not down...thanks to Obama's economy. The rest of your absurd posting is just typical libtard bulls**t...your usual.
You are batting a thousand, always wrong, but never will admit it.
Jan 16, 2015 10:25:35 #
moldyoldy wrote:
You are batting a thousand, always wrong, but never will admit it.
And, the source of your bogus chart?
Try these links, and then you can come back and admit your're wrong...as usual.
http://releases.jhu.edu/2014/05/06/u-s-welfare-spending-up-but-help-for-the-neediest-down/
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/05/140506130259.htm
And, this doesn't even address the increased spending in SNAP.
Jan 16, 2015 10:31:05 #
Sheriff Joe is a true American Sheriff that stands for American
values. I have sent him little money to help support him and I would recommend you do so too.
Jan 16, 2015 10:32:25 #
JMHO wrote:
And, the source of your bogus chart?
Try these links, and then you can come back and admit your're wrong...as usual.
http://releases.jhu.edu/2014/05/06/u-s-welfare-spending-up-but-help-for-the-neediest-down/
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/05/140506130259.htm
And, this doesn't even address the increased spending in SNAP.
Try these links, and then you can come back and admit your're wrong...as usual.
http://releases.jhu.edu/2014/05/06/u-s-welfare-spending-up-but-help-for-the-neediest-down/
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/05/140506130259.htm
And, this doesn't even address the increased spending in SNAP.
Both links are the same story, based on data fron 2004 to 2007. Citing the trend to aid working families instead of non-working people, with things like the earned income credit. But it is still old data.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.