2bltap wrote:
To All on OPP:
Obama has been caught by the American citizens for "IN YOUR FACE" love and the condoning of the beliefs and actions of the radical Islamists. I realize that this is a non starter for those progressive liberals. I will never understand why the v**ers could not see this in the past two p**********l e******ns. Ask yourself how many previous "OCCUPIERS" of that office have ever bowed and kissed the ring/hand of a Muslim head of state let alone a Muslim anything for that matter. How many previous presidents have bent over backwards to accommodate radical behavior of any group that are k*****g Americans, women and children all over the world in the name of some grotesque fanatical belief that states that if you don't submit (Islam) to that belief? Why does Obama have a designated terrorist organization (CAIR and others) by (other Muslim countries) allowed to be so intertwined in "WE THE PEOPLES" government? Why is there such a broad and "IN YOUR FACE" rejection of the words Radical Islam to the point our own military professionals can't even publish those words in their training manuals? One last question I have. Why is our country allowing all this to happen? Could it be fear of being d**gged away in the middle of the night for voicing real concerns like other left c*******t/Marxist dictatorial countries do? I know for me personally I will never bow to any man let alone kiss his hand or ass like this individual taking up space in the Oval Office has done. Just saying his name makes me feel dirty and violated and I'm a Marine. I also know that the next occupant of the Oval Office really needs to fully fumigate and totally clean the Peoples House prior to moving in. You know, like buying a new carpet with the United States seal on it. Remember, he walks on that carpet just like he walks all over the people of this country. I would chip in for that. One last thing I would do would be to with hat in hand ask England's Priminister if his country would please give back the bust of Churchill as it was given to the PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES not obama! The s**t!
In any event these were some things that has been bothering me and thought I'd share the pain.
Semper Fi
To All on OPP: br Obama has been caught by the Am... (
show quote)
To All Here on OPP: Please forgive me for having a major brain fart here for not posting this initially. My topic here was as a result of this piece I was reading from David Limbaugh. Now before all you progressive folks out there get your panties in a twist about it being a Limbaugh who wrote this, the thoughts I wrote I wrote in my comment are my own. This article just got me going.
Semper Fi
Obama Handcuffs America in War on Terrorism
Jan. 13, 2015
In the wake of President Obama's pathetic disengagement over the Islamic jihadist attacks on Paris, people are once again decrying his lack of leadership, but the problem is something more fundamental than leadership.
Even if Obama were a gifted leader, when it comes to many issues, especially confronting radical Islam, he wouldn't know where to lead us. If you misapprehend a problem, you can't possibly navigate, much less lead, toward a solution.
From the beginning of his term in office, Obama has evidenced a deep moral confusion, a distorted worldview perhaps based on a bizarre upbringing. It's not that he doesn't distinguish between good and evil; it's that he often doesn't clearly recognize which is which.
He professes to be a Christian, yet his behavior screams otherwise. Even if he actually is a Christian, he undeniably has a nostalgic attraction and sympathy for Islam, which, among other things, obscures his grasp of the enormity of the threat the world faces from Islamists.
His approach to combating Islamic terrorism is first to downplay its existence and pervasiveness. Beyond that, it is obvious he rejects the idea that there is anything inherent to Islam that leads to radicalism and violence.
Like many of his fellow l*****ts, he believes Islamic radicalism is a result of historical abuses of Muslims, poverty caused by an inequitable distribution of the world's resources, and some kind of mutual irrational distrust between Islam and the Western world.
From the very beginning of his term, with his speech in Cairo and otherwise, he has shown he believes that Westerners are perhaps the main problem. He has lectured us for what he thinks is our distorted perception of Islam and has labored to rehabilitate the image of this religion. Do you remember him doing likewise for the Christian religion or for Christians? Or instead, do you remember his bitter-clingers slander?
He has carried his attitude on this well beyond rhetoric and into governance. At the highest levels of his executive infrastructure, he has directed that we change the way we think and speak about jihad, radical Islam and Islamic terrorism. He has encouraged the federal vernacular to be changed to sanitize references to Islam from our description of acts of terrorism -- even those that are unquestionably committed by Islamic terrorists.
This political-correctness lunacy has had real consequences, such as handcuffing the federal government and preventing it from thoroughly investigating and monitoring the suspicious contacts and actions of Nidal Hasan, a U.S. army major and psychiatrist who fatally shot 13 people and injured more than 30 others in the Fort Hood shootings of 2009.
This attitude has continued right into the present, as Attorney General Eric Holder -- curiously designated to be Obama's representative on the Paris attacks -- stubbornly refuses to call out these attackers for who they are and what they represent.
French Prime Minister Manuel Valls pulled no punches in identifying the culprits and declaring, unambiguously, that France is at war against radical Islam. "It is a war against terrorism, against jihadism, against radical Islam, against everything that is aimed at breaking fraternity, freedom, solidarity," said Valls. "Our indignation must be clear, total and last longer than three days. It must be permanent."
When pressed by NBC's Chuck Todd and ABC's George Stephanopoulos to embrace Valls' declaration, Holder conspicuously, fecklessly and disgracefully demurred. Holder said: "I would say that we are at war with terrorists who commit these heinous acts and who use Islam. They use a corrupted version of Islam to justify their actions." But he wouldn't say we are at war with radical Islam. He and Obama prefer to call radical jihadis "extremists," wholly omitting any reference to Islam or Islamism. Obama, as distinguished from every other Western leader, will not say Islamic terrorists made these attacks.
Even Democratic commentator Doug Schoen has had enough. He wrote: "To speak about the most serious terrorist attack on Western soil since 9/11, London and Madrid, in between speeches about his free community college plan demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding for the gravity of the situation in Paris and, indeed, the world. ... (Obama's) words ... came off as inauthentic at best and offensive at worst. ... We are at war with radical Islam. And President Obama needs to say it."
Lest you think this is merely a semantic quibble, please explain why President Obama refused to attend the Sunday march of world leaders in Paris, in which more than 40 European leaders and almost every French official joined in solidarity for a massive unity rally against the attacks and against radical Islam. Explain why he didn't at least send in his place Vice President Joe Biden or Secretary of State John Kerry. Moreover, explain why Holder was an outright no-show for the event.
Obama spends more time downplaying and denying Islamic terrorism and releasing dangerous terrorists from Guantanamo Bay than he does leading this nation in a war against it. That's because he is not committed to a war against it -- and for another two years, he will be our commander in chief. God help us all.
MAYBE!!! We shall see what we shall see!