Hey fellow MAGA would you ............................................
LostAggie66
Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)
Blade_Runner wrote:
My v**e is not of this world.
You Know Nothing about the Templars.
XXX wrote:
V**e for Haley if Trump ain't able to run?
I would defer to my default v**e when some big gubmint g*******t is running, and choose wh**ever Libertarian is on the b****t. I've done that 5 times since 1976. I'll let y'all do the math.
MatthewlovesAyn wrote:
I would defer to my default v**e when some big gubmint g*******t is running, and choose wh**ever Libertarian is on the b****t. I've done that 5 times since 1976. I'll let y'all do the math.
But you know that you are wasting your v**e, and giving it to whoever wins by default!
XXX
Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
MatthewlovesAyn wrote:
I would defer to my default v**e when some big gubmint g*******t is running, and choose wh**ever Libertarian is on the b****t. I've done that 5 times since 1976. I'll let y'all do the math.
I wouldn't v**e for someone that has 0 chance.
Marty 2020 wrote:
But you know that you are wasting your v**e, and giving it to whoever wins by default!
Actually, it does two things. It tells candidates that they must earn the v**e of right leaning Libertarians. Second, there are laws in place that only recognize parties that reach certain levels of support. I don't call that a waste, I call it a protest.
I walked into the v****g booth in 2016 not knowing if I was v****g for Trump or Johnson. Hillary was never an option. I filled in the oval for Trump. It was the best v**e I ever made, as he turned out to be (by far) the most Libertarian President. The man BELIEVES in liberty. That's what g*******ts h**e and liberals don't understand.
XXX wrote:
I wouldn't v**e for someone that has 0 chance.
Two days before the 2016 e******n, the polls said Trump had no chance. I'm guessing you v**ed for him regardless.
XXX wrote:
I wouldn't v**e for someone that has 0 chance.
Sometimes it's a matter of conscience when you decide to: hold your nose and pick one of the 2 party system candidates that are equally repulsive or choose the one independent candidate who holds values that match your own.
XXX
Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
MatthewlovesAyn wrote:
Two days before the 2016 e******n, the polls said Trump had no chance. I'm guessing you v**ed for him regardless.
I didn't v**e in 2016. I get what you mean though.
MatthewlovesAyn wrote:
I would defer to my default v**e when some big gubmint g*******t is running, and choose wh**ever Libertarian is on the b****t. I've done that 5 times since 1976. I'll let y'all do the math.
Why? So you can get a “I v**ed “sticker?”
XXX wrote:
V**e for Haley if Trump ain't able to run?
I would v**e for the guy who cleans the toilets instead of Biden.
son of witless wrote:
I would v**e for the guy who cleans the toilets instead of Biden.
At least the toilet cleaner is doing something useful.
LostAggie66
Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)
Marty 2020 wrote:
But you know that you are wasting your v**e, and giving it to whoever wins by default!
WRONG v****g for a third party candidate is not wasting your v**e and Neither is choosing a write in candidate a waste either. it's a v**e against the party system In my case it means one less v**e for MrT and perhaps even the incumbent.
XXX
Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
son of witless wrote:
I would v**e for the guy who cleans the toilets instead of Biden.
In that case it would be the guy who cleans the toilet vs the guy that stains the toilet.
LostAggie66
Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)
Michael Roy wrote:
Why? So you can get a “I v**ed “sticker?”
YEP as is every Amercian's duty personal choice who you think is the best choice to become POTUS. If You Don't V**e Don't B***h.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.