Colorado has disqualified Trump from the GOP primary b****t: It just shows that the only threat to Democracy are Democrats...PERIOD!! :sm16: :sm16: :sm16:...

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

nwtk2007 wrote:

And he hasn't been convicted of a thing related to... (show quote)

It just shows that the only threat to Democracy are Democrats...PERIOD!!

DASHY

proud republican wrote:

It just shows that the only threat to Democracy are Democrats...PERIOD!!

It's about time a government body had the balls to recognize a criminal should not be president of the United States. Trump's lawyers offered a defense by stating that under Section 3, Trump was not an "officer of the United States" when he incited the capitol r**t on J** 6. I hope the Colorado decision stands and that other states and e******n officials will follow Colorado's lead.

DASHY

nwtk2007 wrote:

Fucking totally!!! This is a step too far for any l*****t America h**er. We cannot violate Constitutional law or the principal that all are innocent unless or until proven guilty. There can be NO presumption of guilt, EVER!!!!!

This is their step one. Take another, Colorado!! Take another!!

We cannot violate Constitutional law by allowing a losing candidate for president to get away with attempting to overturn the results of an e******n by force.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

DASHY wrote:

It's about time a government body had the balls to recognize a criminal should not be president of the United States. Trump's lawyers offered a defense by stating that under Section 3, Trump was not an "officer of the United States" when he incited the capitol r**t on J** 6. I hope the Colorado decision stands and that other states and e******n officials will follow Colorado's lead.

He was NOT charged with i**********n or s******n!!..You guys are threat to Democracy..

DASHY

proud republican wrote:

He was NOT charged with i**********n or s******n!!..You guys are threat to Democracy..

You are OK with supporting a candidate for president who has been charged with 91 felony counts in 4 criminal cases because the word "i**********n" is not included in the charges? You are joined by your fellow MAGA i***ts. Do you apply this logic to all life decisions?

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

DASHY wrote:

You are OK with supporting a candidate for president who has been charged with 91 felony counts in 4 criminal cases because the word "i**********n" is not included in the charges? You are joined by your fellow MAGA i***ts. Do you apply this logic to all life decisions?

You are INNOCENT until proven Guilty!! He was not proven guilty, at least not yet... So this should NOT DISQUALIFY him from running for office!! This is NOT Banana Republic....

DASHY

proud republican wrote:

You are INNOCENT until proven Guilty!! He was not proven guilty, at least not yet... So this should NOT DISQUALIFY him from running for office!! This is NOT Banana Republic....

The language in the US Constitution disqualifies Trump from holding the office of President of the United States.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

DASHY wrote:

The language in the US Constitution disqualifies Trump from holding the office of President of the United States.

This language was meant for Confederate soldiers, nit President of the United States..

pescado rojo

DASHY wrote:

We cannot violate Constitutional law by allowing a losing candidate for president to get away with attempting to overturn the results of an e******n by force.

But we CAN violate it to allow an accusation to stand in for a conviction?

pescado rojo

DASHY wrote:

The language in the US Constitution disqualifies Trump from holding the office of President of the United States.

So if Biden is impeached, just the accusation is enough to throw him out of the White House. You just said we don't need a conviction, which shows how much you know about the Constitution. I think you're a t*****r, and should be stood up against a wall and shot. You just said an accusation is as good as a conviction, so consider yourself guilty.

pescado rojo

DASHY wrote:

You are OK with supporting a candidate for president who has been charged with 91 felony counts in 4 criminal cases because the word "i**********n" is not included in the charges? You are joined by your fellow MAGA i***ts. Do you apply this logic to all life decisions?

You, and other i***ts like you, consider an accusation a conviction. You would be right at home in Iran, or Venezuela. You should leave soon; I hear they are both lovely this time of year, tovarisch.

DASHY

[quote=pescado rojo]You, and other i***ts like you, consider an accusation a conviction. You would be right at home in Iran, or Venezuela. You should leave soon; I hear they are both lovely this time of year.

How many convictions will it take to convince you that Trump is not suited to be president? Even slippery slimeball Trump will not beat all 91 charges.

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

DASHY wrote:

You are OK with supporting a candidate for president who has been charged with 91 felony counts in 4 criminal cases because the word "i**********n" is not included in the charges? You are joined by your fellow MAGA i***ts. Do you apply this logic to all life decisions?

Charged by a bunch of whiney liberals.....nobody gives a rats ass about your butt hurt bulls**t.

How about you just admit you can't beat him with or without your panty twisting and lying bulls**t charges.

Prepare for the boomerang you goobers never anticipate

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

[quote=DASHY]

pescado rojo wrote:

You, and other i***ts like you, consider an accusation a conviction. You would be right at home in Iran, or Venezuela. You should leave soon; I hear they are both lovely this time of year.

How many convictions will it take to convince you that Trump is not suited to be president? Even slippery slimeball Trump will not beat all 91 charges.

Real convictions or your liberal crybaby accusations?

Either way....... hahahaha.....he's still coming to eat your babies and grab some snatch of the 3 liberal women left who don't have balls.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

proud republican wrote:

This language was meant for Confederate soldiers, nit President of the United States..

If the shoe fits , it’s good for anyone who fits the profile.
Do you really want Putin for President ?
A v**e For Trump is a V**e for Putin .
Wake up !