I’m really looking forward to seeing the results of everybody’s(lefty’s) choices at the great white throne judgement!
Marty 2020 wrote:
I’m really looking forward to seeing the results of everybody’s(lefty’s) choices at the great white throne judgement!
Many of the pro-a******ners don't believe in God, however there are atheists who are pro-life. Permafrost states that he is pro-life yet posts pro-Democrat and despises DJT, the most pro-life president in history.
Nat Hentoff was a columnist for The Village Voice in the 1960s; , anti-war & civil rights leader. He was ostracized by the New Left in the 1970s when he very publicly declared being pro-life. He was either an agnostic or atheistic Jew.
crazylibertarian wrote:
Many of the pro-a******ners don't believe in God, however there are atheists who are pro-life. Permafrost states that he is pro-life yet posts pro-Democrat and despises DJT, the most pro-life president in history.
Nat Hentoff was a columnist for The Village Voice in the 1960s; , anti-war & civil rights leader. He was ostracized by the New Left in the 1970s when he very publicly declared being pro-life. He was either an agnostic or atheistic Jew.
Well then those who have been “good” will suffer a little less than the rest, but hellbound they are.
Marty 2020 wrote:
https://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/medical/DandE-23week.jpg
Pro A******ners ???
Those defending women’s Rights are not
pro A******ners .
They are Pro Women’s rights .that makes Republican women,
Anti Women’s rights .
Milosia2 wrote:
Pro A******ners ???
Those defending women’s Rights are not
pro A******ners .
They are Pro Women’s rights .that makes Republican women,
Anti Women’s rights .
You’re sooo _____________!
Give yourself three guesses!😂😂😂😂😂
Milosia2 wrote:
Pro A******ners ???
Those defending women’s Rights are not
pro A******ners .
They are Pro Women’s rights .that makes Republican women,
Anti Women’s rights .
I should have written pro-murders which would have offended people like you even more but pro-a******ners or pro-murders are both more accurate than pro-choicers. The choice happened when to people entered into sexual activities that were known to possibly result in a pregnancy. To maintain otherwise demonstrates ignorance of basic biology.
The right to life is enshrined in The Declaration of Independence. You should read up on it.
crazylibertarian wrote:
I should have written pro-murders which would have offended people like you even more but pro-a******ners or pro-murders are both more accurate than pro-choicers. The choice happened when to people entered into sexual activities that were known to possibly result in a pregnancy. To maintain otherwise demonstrates ignorance of basic biology.
The right to life is enshrined in The Declaration of Independence. You should read up on it.
Doesn’t that require a third grade education?
She can’t do it!
Milosia2 wrote:
Pro A******ners ???
Those defending women’s Rights are not
pro A******ners .
They are Pro Women’s rights .that makes Republican women,
Anti Women’s rights .
I actually agree with the first part of that. But I'm a Republican. Not all of us are pro-life, no choice. That is about the only thing I disagree with the Republican Party on.
Knightlady wrote:
I actually agree with the first part of that. But I'm a Republican. Not all of us are pro-life, no choice. That is about the only thing I disagree with the Republican Party on.
You’re ok with babies dying because of adults being irresponsible?
Milosia2 wrote:
Pro A******ners ???
Those defending women’s Rights are not
pro A******ners .
They are Pro Women’s rights .that makes Republican women,
Anti Women’s rights .
Pro life has nothing to do with women's rights. The purpose of pro-life is to save children. Anything else is an unfortunate and irrelevant side affect.
A man loses his right to free speech in a crowded theatre.
I lose my right to keep and bear arms in a post office or bank.
A criminal loses his right to liberty when he attacks someone.
A woman loses her right to one choice when she becomes pregnant, and is hosting another person temporarily in her womb.
Milosia2 wrote:
Pro A******ners ???
Those defending women’s Rights are not
pro A******ners .
They are Pro Women’s rights .that makes Republican women,
Anti Women’s rights .
Melonoma2, if you think it's OK for a woman to k**l her UNBORN child why is murder against the law? Is it only a woman's "right" to murder? What about us men? Show me in the Constitution where it says that women can k**l their unborn child, I'll wait.........
Marty 2020 wrote:
You’re ok with babies dying because of adults being irresponsible?
Not necessarily. You don't have to be irresponsible to have an unexpected pregnancy. Even when they take all precautions. I don't believe it should used as a method of birth control. I don't think many think that's a good idea
If you need to vet the woman & man, do so, but they should vet the i******s too.
I believe in the right to choose. I really don't understand that a bunch of rich old men think they know me better than I do.
Some of you folks think that all of us are going to stand in line for a******ns. That's just not true.
How about the fathers that just leave have to have a permanent vasectomy?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.