OBAMA'S IDENTITY FRAUD AND MICKEY MOUSE MEDIA
Exclusive: Diana West blasts press' 'psychosis of denial' in coverage of president


From the “A” section of the New York Times, Page 15, in less than 100 words, the psychosis of denial as it is hard-wired into American journalism:

Six years into his presidency, there seems to be almost nothing the nation does not know about Mr. Obama, ranging from his views on the use of drones to target terrorists to how his daughters have less interest in h*****g out with him as they become teenagers.

But little is known about the state of his game and what he is like on the golf course,where he has spent roughly 1,000 hours playing 214 rounds since he was elected in 2008, according to Mark Knoller, a CBS correspondent who has kept track of the president’s schedule.

With this, the “paper of record” proceeds to “inform” readers about the never-before-revealed details of Barack Hussein Obama’s golf game.

Now we know everything?

Fat chance. For starters, there’s that unsolved mystery of why there is a piece of phony electronic artwork on the White House website purporting to be an image of a 1961 government document attesting to the details of Barack Obama’s birth. That this is evidence of what is likely the biggest case of identity fraud in history isn’t news to American media investigating more pressing matters (e.g., the p**********l golf game). Nor, it seems, is other evidence of fraud or forgery from different investigations and numerous court proceedings. But it’s not just media (exception: WND.com) that turn their collective blind eye. Relevant federal, state and local authorities (exception: Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio) have consistently ignored, derided or buried all such evidence rather than carry out their legal responsibilities.

Interestingly, the president himself hasn’t ignored it all. He can’t. When he must, Obama has paid untold sums to legal teams to defend himself in court against the multiple challenges to his eligibility to serve as president that crescendoed in 2012.

In a case questioning Obama’s eligibility for the 2012 p**********l b****t in Georgia, evidence was introduced in an administrative law court to prove that the president is using a Connecticut Social Security number (he never lived in Connecticut), that Obama’s Social Security number was never really issued to him, and that his Social Security number does not pass the U.S. government’s own E-Verify test.

The Obama legal response? Obama lawyer Michael Jablonski tried to deflect the Social Security issue – which itself indicates an epic case of possible felony fraud – not by proving the allegations to be false and ridiculous, but rather by pointing out that “nothing in the Constitution makes … participating in Social Security a prerequisite to serving as president.”

Is that what a normal person, even a president, who has a regular old Social Security number would do?

The simplest line of defense is always going to be the t***h – if, that is, one’s Social Security number is on the up-and-up. The Obama defense, however, was to bypass the fraud charges altogether and point out that having a Social Security number is not a prerequisite to serving as president!

Isn’t this rather curious legal strategy worth some media scrutiny – maybe even just one follow-up question? Nope. Gotta stake out that p**********l putting green.

Walking away from allegedly dirty documents became the basis of the Obama defense. Obama lawyers took this same tack – not to defend allegedly false identity documents but rather show them to be irrelevant to p**********l eligibility – in a 2012 New Jersey b****t challenge. (More unusually, so did the administrative law judge in the case, Jeff Masin, who actually seemed to help Obama lawyer Alexandra Hill stick to her own team’s defensive strategy.) In the New Jersey case, the Obama defense rested on the fact that because Obama did not present his birth certificate to state e******n officials (and, by law, was not required to do so), forgery or not, it was irrelevant to his eligibility to appear on the b****t.

As Judge Mazin put it: “So the question of whether the document that is produced turns out to be a forgery, it seems to me is irrelevant because he hasn’t produced it.” Obama lawyer Hill later replied: “You could have Mickey Mouse … and everyone could sign up and go with it.”

No further questions, said the media – in fact, no questions at all.

Meanwhile, the lawyer did raise a good point. Mickey Mouse would have been a definite improvement over Obama, and not just for the country.

The arrested-development media might actually have covered Mickey Mouse.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/obamas-identity-fraud-and-mickey-mouse-media/#EBdLmRRmXDgucjtQ.99

OBAMA'S IDENTITY FRAUD AND MICKEY MOUSE MEDIA
Exclusive: Diana West blasts press' 'psychosis of denial' in coverage of president


From the “A” section of the New York Times, Page 15, in less than 100 words, the psychosis of denial as it is hard-wired into American journalism:

Six years into his presidency, there seems to be almost nothing the nation does not know about Mr. Obama, ranging from his views on the use of drones to target terrorists to how his daughters have less interest in h*****g out with him as they become teenagers.

But little is known about the state of his game and what he is like on the golf course,where he has spent roughly 1,000 hours playing 214 rounds since he was elected in 2008, according to Mark Knoller, a CBS correspondent who has kept track of the president’s schedule.

With this, the “paper of record” proceeds to “inform” readers about the never-before-revealed details of Barack Hussein Obama’s golf game.

Now we know everything?

Fat chance. For starters, there’s that unsolved mystery of why there is a piece of phony electronic artwork on the White House website purporting to be an image of a 1961 government document attesting to the details of Barack Obama’s birth. That this is evidence of what is likely the biggest case of identity fraud in history isn’t news to American media investigating more pressing matters (e.g., the p**********l golf game). Nor, it seems, is other evidence of fraud or forgery from different investigations and numerous court proceedings. But it’s not just media (exception: WND.com) that turn their collective blind eye. Relevant federal, state and local authorities (exception: Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio) have consistently ignored, derided or buried all such evidence rather than carry out their legal responsibilities.

Interestingly, the president himself hasn’t ignored it all. He can’t. When he must, Obama has paid untold sums to legal teams to defend himself in court against the multiple challenges to his eligibility to serve as president that crescendoed in 2012.

In a case questioning Obama’s eligibility for the 2012 p**********l b****t in Georgia, evidence was introduced in an administrative law court to prove that the president is using a Connecticut Social Security number (he never lived in Connecticut), that Obama’s Social Security number was never really issued to him, and that his Social Security number does not pass the U.S. government’s own E-Verify test.

The Obama legal response? Obama lawyer Michael Jablonski tried to deflect the Social Security issue – which itself indicates an epic case of possible felony fraud – not by proving the allegations to be false and ridiculous, but rather by pointing out that “nothing in the Constitution makes … participating in Social Security a prerequisite to serving as president.”

Is that what a normal person, even a president, who has a regular old Social Security number would do?

The simplest line of defense is always going to be the t***h – if, that is, one’s Social Security number is on the up-and-up. The Obama defense, however, was to bypass the fraud charges altogether and point out that having a Social Security number is not a prerequisite to serving as president!

Isn’t this rather curious legal strategy worth some media scrutiny – maybe even just one follow-up question? Nope. Gotta stake out that p**********l putting green.

Walking away from allegedly dirty documents became the basis of the Obama defense. Obama lawyers took this same tack – not to defend allegedly false identity documents but rather show them to be irrelevant to p**********l eligibility – in a 2012 New Jersey b****t challenge. (More unusually, so did the administrative law judge in the case, Jeff Masin, who actually seemed to help Obama lawyer Alexandra Hill stick to her own team’s defensive strategy.) In the New Jersey case, the Obama defense rested on the fact that because Obama did not present his birth certificate to state e******n officials (and, by law, was not required to do so), forgery or not, it was irrelevant to his eligibility to appear on the b****t.

As Judge Mazin put it: “So the question of whether the document that is produced turns out to be a forgery, it seems to me is irrelevant because he hasn’t produced it.” Obama lawyer Hill later replied: “You could have Mickey Mouse … and everyone could sign up and go with it.”

No further questions, said the media – in fact, no questions at all.

Meanwhile, the lawyer did raise a good point. Mickey Mouse would have been a definite improvement over Obama, and not just for the country.

The arrested-development media might actually have covered Mickey Mouse.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/obamas-identity-fraud-and-mickey-mouse-media/#EBdLmRRmXDgucjtQ.99

I get tired of hearing about s***ery all the time, that is in the past and the black hide behind it, ever think that if it hadn't been for s***ery all of you wouldn't be here and because it gave them a job, we in the present do not owe the b****s anything because a hundred years ago, their grandfather had a job and that's more than what's going on today. most of out b****s are on the streets causing trouble and there's too much of b****s k*****g b****s, what's the point to that? Start thinking instead of whining all the time. Yes sometimes a white cop has to shoot a black BUT they are mostly criminals and contest the law or they wouldn't be shot but the b****s can't see beyond hatred and protesting, that has just become a fun game with loose destruction senselessly, get a life and if you choose to live in American do yourself a favor and live like the Americans and get rid of all the hatred.

Exactly the way I would expect a self centered black guy to react to a simple mistake and you admire him for it.
I wore a suit to work and when shopping in up scale men's clothing stores was often mistaken for a sales person,never felt the need to go Rambo over it.It also happen at airports when I was in the military,mistaken for a baggage handler by old people,never felt I had to destroy their luggage because of it.
I don't think Mr.young should be admired for a complete loss of control over his person,but you b****s are a very violent people and can't seem to control yourselves.

Exactly the way I would expect a self centered black guy to react to a simple mistake and you admire him for it.
I wore a suit to work and when shopping in up scale men's clothing stores was often mistaken for a sales person,never felt the need to go Rambo over it.It also happen at airports when I was in the military,mistaken for a baggage handler by old people,never felt I had to destroy their luggage because of it.
I don't think Mr.young should be admired for a complete loss of control over his person,but you b****s are a very violent people and can't seem to control yourselves.

Exactly the way I would expect a self centered black guy to react to a simple mistake and you admire him for it.
I wore a suit to work and when shopping in up scale men's clothing stores was often mistaken for a sales person,never felt the need to go Rambo over it.It also happen at airports when I was in the military,mistaken for a baggage handler by old people,never felt I had to destroy their luggage because of it.
I don't think Mr.young should be admired for a complete loss of control over his person,but you b****s are a very violent people and can't seem to control yourselves.