This is wrong!!!.. If a woman's life is in danger, Supreme Court should not let a man to decide if and when she should have an a******n..l
Dec 9, 2023 16:08:52 #
Dec 9, 2023 16:25:47 #
proud republican wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/08/us/texas-a******n-ruling-attorney-general-petition/index.html
As the pendulum swings between extremes.Dec 9, 2023 17:08:36 #
proud republican wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/08/us/texas-a******n-ruling-attorney-general-petition/index.html
This is the mission of the people you v**e into office
Dec 9, 2023 17:15:14 #
proud republican wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/08/us/texas-a******n-ruling-attorney-general-petition/index.html
I totally agree. The woman should always be free to choose if and when to have an a******n. This case is a good example of the need for the pro-choice position.
Dec 9, 2023 17:25:57 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
DASHY wrote:
I totally agree. The woman should always be free to choose if and when to have an a******n. This case is a good example of the need for the pro-choice position.
I'm still pro- life but with exceptions as in rape, incest and in this case danger to mother's life..
Dec 9, 2023 18:20:21 #
proud republican wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/08/us/texas-a******n-ruling-attorney-general-petition/index.html
If her life is in danger she needs to get fixed
Dec 9, 2023 18:25:12 #
crazylibertarian
Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
Kevyn wrote:
This is the mission of the people you v**e into office
As you likely have not noticed, federal court justices are not v**ed into office.
Dec 9, 2023 18:28:25 #
crazylibertarian
Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
DASHY wrote:
I totally agree. The woman should always be free to choose if and when to have an a******n. This case is a good example of the need for the pro-choice position.
There are extremely few cases where the mother's life is in danger; far fewer than 800,000 a******n performed each year. Did your mother ever regret not aborting you?
Dec 9, 2023 18:34:28 #
proud republican wrote:
I'm still pro- life but with exceptions as in rape, incest and in this case danger to mother's life..
Kate Cox, 31, of the Dallas-Fort Worth area, sought court authorization for the a******n because her fetus was diagnosed on Nov. 27 with trisomy 18, a genetic a******lity that usually results in miscarriage, stillbirth or death soon after birth.
Cox, who is about 20 weeks pregnant, said in her lawsuit that she would need to undergo her third caesarean section if she continues the pregnancy. That could jeopardize her ability to have more children, which she said she and her husband want.
Has she thought about her ability to have more children as she and her husband have stated if she goes through with an a******n is one of the questions I have.
BTW… this is NOT an endangerment to the Mrs Cox’s life. Stillbirth or miscarriage result in the death of the mother <0.01% of the time in the U.S.
Dec 9, 2023 18:35:00 #
proud republican wrote:
I'm still pro- life but with exceptions as in rape, incest and in this case danger to mother's life..
You are pro life until YOU decide it is free choice. Do you see a problem with that? I am still pro-choice because the woman is always in the best position to decide, not you.
Dec 9, 2023 18:36:22 #
DASHY wrote:
You are pro life until YOU decide it is free choice. Do you see a problem with that? I am still pro-choice because the woman is always in the best position to decide, not you.
Never mind about the baby who has NO choice eh?
Dec 9, 2023 18:42:20 #
DASHY wrote:
You are pro life until YOU decide it is free choice. Do you see a problem with that? I am still pro-choice because the woman is always in the best position to decide, not you.
Does she have a choice not to get pregnant?
Dec 9, 2023 18:44:14 #
Dec 9, 2023 18:46:55 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Does she have a choice not to get pregnant?
Most of the time, some of the time no.
How about fathers that leave? Permanent vasectomy comes to mind
Dec 9, 2023 19:39:04 #
Parky60 wrote:
Never mind about the baby who has NO choice eh?
When an unborn child is diagnosed with the fatal genetic condition Trisomy 18, parents are offered a termination in this setting, given this condition is not compatible with life. The mother chooses to continue with her life.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.