Yankee Clipper

How U.S. Marxists Use ‘Amnesty’ to Create a Socialist ‘One Party State’

This should be of interest to all on this site.


http://americac2c.com/profiles/blogs/how-u-s-marxists-use-amnesty-to-create-a-socialist-one-party-stat?xg_source=msg_mes_network

melbell Loc: California / Kentucky

Unable to read the article. It was a sign in page.

Yankee Clipper

I forgot you have to be a member to see their articles. I will print the who thing out it is a little long. I don't know how to make the pictures come with it.



How U.S. Marxists Use ‘Amnesty’ to Create a Socialist ‘One Party State’
Posted by Laura J Alcorn National Director on December 31, 2014 at 2:30pmSend Message View Blog
How U.S. Marxists Use ‘Amnesty’ to Create a Socialist ‘One Party St...
By: Trevor Loudon
New Zeal
immigrationreform
In all the debate about President Barack Obama‘s “Executive Amnesty” for i*****l a***ns, few have discussed the real reason for Obama’s move.
The president has risked huge “political capital” on a very risky and possibly illegal move, that he believes will define his Presidency and secure his legacy with his “Progressive” base.
Obama is simply after the v**es. He believes that by legalizing eleven to twenty million “i******s” and eventually giving them the v**e, he will turn America into a permanent Democratic Party “one party state.”
Furthermore, the President intends there to be no turning back. As a long time ally of the the Gramsci-loving Marxists of Democratic Socialists of America, Obama understands that his Democratic Party is now controlled by the unions and that the unions are controlled by DSA and other Marxist groups.
He knows there will be no “20 year window” for the Republicans to build their share of the Latino v**e. He understands that if the Democrats win the next one or two P**********l e******ns, the left will use the power of the state to divide and smash their Republican, conservative and Evangelical Christian opposition – forever.
Obama understands, even if the leadership of the GOP doesn’t, that this is not the old Republican/Democrat turnabout game. This is much more like the C*******t takeover of Czechoslovakia in 1948, or the socialization of Venezuela under Hugo Chavez. Obama and his Marxist allies are playing for keeps – and “Amnesty” is one of their main weapons.
Ruy Teixeira
Ruy Teixeira
Ruy Teixeira was a member of Democratic Socialists of America in Madison, Wisconsin back in the 1980s.
He is now a Senior Fellow at the l*****t Center for American Progress, as well as a Fellow of the New Politics Institute. He was recently a Visiting Fellow at the Brookings Institution, where he co-directed a joint Brookings-American Enterprise Institute project on political demography and geography.
Teixeira’s book, The Emerging Democratic Majority, written with fellow Marxist John Judis (Scribner, 2002), was the most widely discussed political book of that year. Teixeira’s recent writings include “New Progressive America,” “The Decline of the White Working Class and the Rise of a Mass Upper Middle Class,” “The Politics of Definition” (with John Halpin) and “Back to the Future: The Emerging Democratic Majority Re-emerges” (with Judis).
Despite the Democrat’s “shellacking” in the 2014 mid-terms, Teixeira recently told the Huffington Post that he is very confident that the Democrats can win the Presidency in 2016 and beyond:
Ruy Teixeira, a Democratic demographer, points to a group of states worth 242 e*******l v**es that the Democratic p**********l nominee has won in every e******n since 1992. Hold them all, and the party is just 28 v**es shy of the majority needed to win the White House next time.
Barack Obama twice compiled at least 332 e*******l v**es by adding wins in most every competitive state. He posted double-digit wins among women, huge margins among v**ers younger than 30 and historically high marks among b****s and Latinos.
As non-white v**ers continue to grow as a share of the e*****rate, a Democratic nominee that roughly holds Obama’s 2012 level of support across all demographic groups would win the national popular v**e by about 6 percentage points and coast in the E*******l College, Teixeira estimates.
“Could a Republican win? Sure,” Teixeira said. “But they have to have a lot of different things happen.
Another DSA comrade has been even more explicit on the exploitation of immigrants and “i******s” in the pursuit of an unassailable Democratic majority.
Medina, Chicago DSA meeting 2004
Medina, Chicago DSA meeting 2004
Eliseo Medina was until recently the executive vice – president of the SEIU. After the AFL-CIO was conquered by DSA in 1994-96, he led the charge to get the unions to switch from an anti-“illegal” position to a pro-“Amnesty” policy. Many readers may remember when the unions were constantly calling for increased border security and were always lobbying Congress to increase penalties for businesses caught hiring “i******s.”
Medina speaking
Medina speaking
Why are unions now leading the charge to legalize the “i******s”? Because Eliseo Medina and his DSA comrades worked very hard to make it happen. It took 5 years of hard core lobbying and deal-making, but Medina eventually engineered the AFL-CIO’s policy shift from anti “illegal” to pro-“Amnesty”, which was ratified at the AFL-CIOs national convention in Louisiana 2000.
Before 1994, the AFL-CIO leadership actually cared about the interests of their membership. Now they’re happy to sell their own member’s jobs and conditions down the river. It’s all the about the Revolution comrades!
In recent years, Medina has become the undisputed and very well connected leader of the “Amnesty” movement.
In 2008, Medina was one of several Marxists serving on President Obama’s Latino Advisory Council. He has had ready access to the President ever since and was reportedly personally consulted by the President before Obama started his recent push for “Amnesty.”
In December 2013, when Medina and others fasted 22 days for “Amnesty” in the National Mall, the emaciated Marxist was honored by a personal visit from the President himself.
Obama, Medina, national mall, December 2013
Obama, Medina, National Mall, December 2013
But why does Medina do this? What is the goal?
Medina let the cat out of the bag At the ultra “Progressive” America’s Future Now! conference in Washington, DC on June 2, 2009, where he addressed attendees on the necessity of “comprehensive immigration reform” – the “Progressive’ code for “Amnesty.”
Speaking of Latino v**ers in the 2008 e******ns, Medina said “when they v**ed in November, they v**ed overwhelmingly for Progressive candidates. Barack Obama got two out of every three v**ers that showed up.”
So I think there’s two things that matter for the progressive community.

Number one, if we are to expand this e*****rate to win, the progressive community needs to solidly be on the side of immigrants, that we’ll expand and solidify the progressive coalition for the future…”
When you are in the middle of a fight for your life you will remember who was there with you. And immigrants count on progressives to be able to do that.
Number two.
“We reform the i*********n l*ws, it puts 12 million people on the path to citizenship and eventually v**ers”. Can you imagine if we have, even the same ratio, two out of three?
If we have eight million new v**ers who care about …… and will be v****g. We will be creating a governing coalition for the long term, not just for an e******n cycle…
As Medina is a Marxist and Marxists almost never give up power voluntarily, “a governing coalition for the long term” effectively means a permanent “one party state.”
If America is to survive as a free nation, several things must happen.
The Ted Cruz/patriotic wing of the Republican Party and grass-roots conservatives across the nation must fight every aspect of “Amnesty” tooth and nail until it is defeated. They must become the dominant faction inside the GOP – very quickly.
Existing i*********n l*ws must be strongly enforced, the Southern border must be sealed and other points of entry more effectively policed. Imagine if most Latino “i******s” v**ed Republican? Obama would have fenced and patrolled the southern border in his first month of office! It can be done, it just takes political will and a ton of guts.
The 20 million plus conservative and Evangelical Christians who are not even registered to v**e MUST be mobilized for the 2016 e******ns and beyond. Ted Cruz and his equally inspiring pastor father, Rafael Cruz, could do this. Pro-“Amnesty” Jeb Bush wouldn’t have a prayer. Neither will the GOP if he is their 2016 P**********l candidate.
Socialists Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren, the unions, the Marxists, Silicon Valley and the Chamber of Commerce/”cheap labor” wing of the Republican Party all want “Amnesty.” The country be damned.
Only the Ted Cruz wing of the GOP, the conservative “grass roots” leaders of “middle America” and the patriotic pastors, the “Black Robed Regiments,” can save the American Republic now.
If America goes down, every Western country will fall. There is nowhere left to run.
For all our sakes, America’s patriots better start working together and get more organized, pretty darned quick.
I for one, have faith that they can.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Myself and some others have been posting this same message for well over a year. What makes you think anyone will pay attention now? If the Prevaricator-in-Chief thought for a moment these wetbacks would v**e Republican, he would have the Border closed tighter than a bull's ass in blackfly season inside of 24 hours.

melbell Loc: California / Kentucky

I will share this with my husband this evening.
I have been alluding to this exact scenario since 2010.
I have been told by the progressives in my family that even thinking this about the democratic party was well conspiratorial and not representative of the historical stance of the unions.
Now I am just one person . My husband now sees some reason for alarm. He and three of his siblings are discussing politics and policy regularly. They are all challenging the thought process of the other two siblings. They are also challenging the rational of policies previously supported by their father.

I have two sisters one has withdrawn from the political process , news and any discussion . she did v**e for Obama in 2012 . she declared she was not informed enough to v**e responsibly in the state e******ns of 2014. The other sister long time democrat is no longer approaching me with the issues she champions. Why ? because , whereas in the past I often had to look into things and get back to her. Now I am quite resolved and the tediousness of preparing for additional discussion of issues is now counted as joy. No longer is it trivial, no longer is it a meer policy debate. Because it never was it was and is agenda driven. As such each discussion must also place policy in context of history and stated agenda inferred agenda and on.
I have traditionally been a moderate Republican. No longer, I have determined that we must return to our constitution .
We must be ultra conservative fiscally speaking. We must as individuals ,as a family as communities and as our respective states. Determine who we are and speak to our self ascribed identity to our state representation so that nationally we will be represented. The questions are who are we as a nation? Would you like our nation to be a socialist nation? Which socialist nation would you like our nation to follow? How much of our constitution would you like us to keep?
These articles were missed by many the first time they were posted . I had not read it. It lays out quite clearly my thoughts as to the motive of importing a new citizenry.

Do not lose heart keep posting. This is a matter of winning hearts and minds. So we must continue to post articles on our Facebook pages. Speak of articles with family and friends.
I wrote all of this to you as I saw the comment of the user Loki . I hope he will include his thoughts on the article as they were when he first read it and as they his thoughts are now. Those of us new to the long term subversion of our country, need the encouragement of those who have seen this for a longer period of time.
Finally I do not want to reside in a c*******t or Marxist or socialist country. I believe in the ideas this country was founded on. No where in the Federalist papers the Constitution Bill of Rights or Declaration of Independence, have I found support for C*******m /Marxism or Socialism.
I have limited knowledge regarding history What little I know of the governmental practises ,especially, as it relates to those using the C*******t/ Marxist/Socialist models, they are consistently incompatible with Human Rights.
So Thank you for posting this article.

Yankee Clipper

Loki Loc: Georgia

Regarding "The Law" by Frederic Bastiat, you can Google it and read the entire thing for free.

Yankee Clipper

melbell Loc: California / Kentucky

Thank you for the book suggestion.
I made note of the Hulda website.
I may start with the e book and still purchase a copy.

Yankee Clipper