One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Say NO to GPS Tracking
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Dec 29, 2014 14:18:42   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/29/americans-should-just-say-no-gps-tracking-their-ca/

Americans should just say no to GPS tracking of their cars and trucks

Watch out — as the new year approaches the powers-that-be always unleash a new hoard of laws, rules and regulations. Already, we’re seeing another Orwellian idea re-emerge from its musty cave: The notion that drivers should pay an additional tax (they’ll call it a fee) based on how many miles you drive.

Causing a stir as far back as in 2001 when Oregon noticed that more fuel-efficient cars would impact gas tax revenue, politicians began to scramble to figure out how to use your driving as an excuse to take wh**ever money you have left in your wallet.

At least 18 states are now considering bills to do just this, and Oregon has initiated a pilot program. CBS News reports, “The Oregon pilot programs seeks to demonstrate whether a per-mile tax is a practical possibility. The state is finding 5,000 volunteers to pay 1.5-cents-per-mile tax instead of the 30 cents-per-gallon gas tax. Devices will report their mileage to the state. Other states are trying smaller pilot projects, including Nevada, Washington, Minnesota and California. The U.S. Senate passed a bill calling for a $90 million pilot project involving 10,000 cars. But the House leadership k**led the bill after complaints from rural lawmakers that such a tax would unfairly penalize their constituents, who tend to drive farther than city drivers.”

It’s not just fairness that is at issue, it’s also about privacy. I contend this is a double-whammy by the government, which always wants to control two things: your money and your life.

As local, state and the federal government get bigger and, consequently, more incompetent, they see the average citizen as more of a threat. There are two ways to control that threat: eliminate disposable income, which funds your personal freedom, including political activities. The other is to condition you into accepting a complete elimination of your personal privacy and allowing the government to know when and where you go at all times.

Consider this: The programs being suggested or tested to track your mileage involve installing a GPS tracking device to determine not just how far you go, but which roads you use, how fast you go, and whether or not you’re a “good” driver, i.e., how fast you come up to stops.


The notion of GPS tracking of drivers should disturb everyone and should be rejected as an unacceptable, even Kafkaesque, attempt of government to establish a f*****t system of surveillance and control.

The whining of politicians that they’re running out of highway repair funds is also rather ridiculous considering the money spent on that very issue through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the Crap Sandwich. Tens of billions of dollars were allocated for projects such as road and bridge repair, yet we’re now being told that, well, we need road and bridge repair.

In addition to Oregon, California is considering a mileage “fee” plan as well. Here again, as The Los Angeles Times reports, “Millions of vehicles also would have to be equipped with odometer readers, smartphone applications or global positioning technology that would t***smit data to state officials or a contractor, who would then bill owners for the miles traveled. Privacy advocates are especially concerned that — in this era of data mining and well-publicized credit card breaches — the technology could be used to learn not only how far people go, but when and where.”

You think? One of the more silly claims is a mileage fee would replace the gas tax. Jonathan Gruber must have assured someone that we’re stupid. We all know, once a tax is implemented, it is never removed.

It also seems, once politicians get their hands on our money, there is no restriction or common sense used on how to spend it. Before we hike taxes and use mandatory, constant monitoring of the individual to apply that tax, how about eliminating the wasteful spending of politicians?

The Government Accountability Office has just released a report stating that eliminating unnecessary duplication within various departments could save hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Information Week reminds us of Sen. Tom Coburn’s “Wastebook 2014”: “Some examples of wasteful spending in Coburn’s report include more than $8,000 that the DOD spent on helicopter parts, which actually cost less than $500; Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Criminal Division paying $544,338 for a premium LinkedIn account; and the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) $202,000 investment to study why Wikipedia is sexist.”

In a story titled, “The outrage of wasteful government spending,” Newsday reports Medicare is considered “a “high risk program” because an estimated $44 billion of its 2012 payouts were improper.”


These are just a few examples, but are an important reminder of the sea of government corruption and incompetence in which we are all drowning. Now these very same people spend a great deal of their time figuring out how to take more of our money and freedom.

The new year of 2015 could be one in which the citizen could accomplish a great deal. At the top of our “to do” list should be a reminder to make sure our state and federal representatives know tracking and taxing us like a government-owned beast of burden is unequivocally unacceptable.

Reply
Dec 29, 2014 16:05:19   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
More governmental overreach and a way to further tax its citizens.

Reply
Dec 29, 2014 16:17:32   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
More governmental overreach and a way to further tax its citizens.


The phrase consequences of actions comes to mind. Increase MPG in cars, obviously, leads to les gas usage, leading to less gas tax revenue. Encouraging work from home leads to less gas revenue.

Reply
 
 
Dec 29, 2014 16:17:47   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
I can't imagine any consumer being in favor of a mileage tax. I don't have GPS, myself, but do cross-country driving to see Family and/or friends. It is over-the-top and unreasonable to tax my visiting them.

Reply
Dec 29, 2014 16:19:15   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
AuntiE wrote:
The phrase consequences of actions comes to mind. Increase MPG in cars, obviously, leads to les gas usage, leading to less gas tax revenue. Encouraging work from home leads to less gas revenue.


That is exactly the situation, I would think. :wink:

Reply
Dec 29, 2014 16:32:34   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
slatten49 wrote:
I can't imagine any consumer being in favor of a mileage tax. I don't have GPS, myself, but do cross-country driving to see Family and/or friends. It is over-the-top and unreasonable to tax my visiting them.


Beyond your travel out of state, consider the impact during softball season, your t***sporting individuals for doctor's appointments, which you often do, Sgt. Major visiting her sister, etc. You can definitely forget weekend forays just for fun.

Reply
Dec 29, 2014 16:50:25   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
AuntiE wrote:
Beyond your travel out of state, consider the impact during softball season, your t***sporting individuals for doctor's appointments, which you often do, Sgt. Major visiting her sister, etc. You can definitely forget weekend forays just for fun.


Thanks for cheering me up, Lady. :hunf:

Reply
 
 
Dec 29, 2014 17:03:23   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
I turned my GPS tracker off as well as my phone..If I want you followng me I'll let you know..otherwise government can stay out of my private life..

Reply
Dec 29, 2014 17:11:58   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
slatten49 wrote:
Thanks for cheering me up, Lady. :hunf:


Currently, Texas is not crazy enough to attempt such a policy.

Now, you should be cheerful. :D :roll:

Reply
Dec 29, 2014 17:13:54   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
lindajoy wrote:
I turned my GPS tracker off as well as my phone..If I want you followng me I'll let you know..otherwise government can stay out of my private life..


My car is old enough it has no GPS. UncleE has it. Everytime he has used it to go somewhere, it has directed us around the longest route imaginable.

Reply
Dec 29, 2014 17:29:55   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
AuntiE wrote:
Currently, Texas is not crazy enough to attempt such a policy.

Now, you should be cheerful. :D :roll:


I assume you have never been to Austin, the citadel of liberalism in Texas.

Reply
 
 
Dec 29, 2014 17:31:31   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
AuntiE wrote:
My car is old enough it has no GPS. UncleE has it. Every time he has used it to go somewhere, it has directed us around the longest route imaginable.


That is because he enjoys sightseeing in the countryside.

Reply
Dec 29, 2014 17:38:06   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
That is because he enjoys sightseeing in the countryside.


Or.... :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: wishes to spend additional time with AuntieE. :idea: :idea: :idea:

Reply
Dec 29, 2014 17:39:14   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
I assume you have never been to Austin, the citadel of liberalism in Texas.


It is hoped the remainder of sane people will continue guiding the Lone Star! :idea: :idea: :idea:

Reply
Dec 29, 2014 17:48:01   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
AuntiE wrote:
It is hoped the remainder of sane people will continue guiding the Lone Star! :idea: :idea: :idea:


One can always hope.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.