Theo
Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida
The (gag!) Court of Supremes? I thought the "Supremes" were a musical group. They shoulda stayed with what they knew best.
Anyway, I considered their "findings" and discovered they did not "Find" anything remotely like what they published; it was made up out of whole cloth, to aid their political cronies who needed to be able to lie in order to succeed in their political ass-pirations.
I went back to my early years and interviewed some pretty knowledgeable folks, who told me that many of the signers of the constitution, the declaration of Independence, and the bill of rights, later were killed ,or did the killing, of those who said things that were not true. It was legal, it was known in the vernacular as "Dueling" (It was known in the jugular as "ouch") and death settled all arguments.
Some well known political fellows were killed for what theys aid. This is how I know the constitution writers had no such "Intent" as those "Supremes" cited, when they said political speech is protected by the "intent" of the framers of the constitution.
I think we need to go back to fencing, when some politician tells a lie. It is easy to tell, because his lips make his eyes dodge, when they move.
As for fencing, to correct the statements of liars in politics, it works this way - You herd them all into the closest pasture, and build a BIG!!! fence around them. Just remember to leave out the gate. We do not want them to get out to do their mischief again.
All in favour of "fencing" and "dueling" to reclaim our government, vote with me in the next campaign.
Theo wrote:
The (gag!) Court of Supremes? I thought the "Supremes" were a musical group. They shoulda stayed with what they knew best.
Anyway, I considered their "findings" and discovered they did not "Find" anything remotely like what they published; it was made up out of whole cloth, to aid their political cronies who needed to be able to lie in order to succeed in their political ass-pirations.
I went back to my early years and interviewed some pretty knowledgeable folks, who told me that many of the signers of the constitution, the declaration of Independence, and the bill of rights, later were killed ,or did the killing, of those who said things that were not true. It was legal, it was known in the vernacular as "Dueling" (It was known in the jugular as "ouch") and death settled all arguments.
Some well known political fellows were killed for what theys aid. This is how I know the constitution writers had no such "Intent" as those "Supremes" cited, when they said political speech is protected by the "intent" of the framers of the constitution.
I think we need to go back to fencing, when some politician tells a lie. It is easy to tell, because his lips make his eyes dodge, when they move.
As for fencing, to correct the statements of liars in politics, it works this way - You herd them all into the closest pasture, and build a BIG!!! fence around them. Just remember to leave out the gate. We do not want them to get out to do their mischief again.
All in favour of "fencing" and "dueling" to reclaim our government, vote with me in the next campaign.
The (gag!) Court of Supremes? I thought the "... (
show quote)
Study Common Law, it is how our legal system is organized.
Theo
Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida
Dummy Boy wrote:
Study Common Law, it is how our legal system is organized.
I know how it is "organized."
Do you know how it became so "DISORGANIZED?"
I do. The Supreme Court legislating from the bench. Making it up as they go along. Changing thousands of years of accepted mores for "New World Order" cockamamie idiocy.
The Abortionists were supported in their murderous chase of the unborn, while the Homosexuals became so "proud" of their stupidity, they could not even contain themselves in parades, but had to spill over into the realm of "ruling society" with their evil.
Theo wrote:
I know how it is "organized."
Do you know how it became so "DISORGANIZED?"
I do. The Supreme Court legislating from the bench. Making it up as they go along. Changing thousands of years of accepted mores for "New World Order" cockamamie idiocy.
The Abortionists were supported in their murderous chase of the unborn, while the Homosexuals became so "proud" of their stupidity, they could not even contain themselves in parades, but had to spill over into the realm of "ruling society" with their evil.
I know how it is "organized." br br Do ... (
show quote)
You don't understand anything, you are frustrated and you are wrong. You're mixing up God's and man's law.
You should spend less time attending gay parades...
Theo
Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida
Dummy Boy wrote:
You don't understand anything, you are frustrated and you are wrong. You're mixing up God's and man's law.
You should spend less time attending gay parades...
You should spend more time praying for "Good" instead of braying out "evil."
Theo wrote:
You should spend more time praying for "Good" instead of braying out "evil."
YOU should spend more time praying and then you would realize it doesn't do any good. I know one thing though, it would keep you occupied enough so the rest of us didn't have to listen to your stupid whining.
Theo
Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida
Dummy Boy wrote:
YOU should spend more time praying and then you would realize it doesn't do any good. I know one thing though, it would keep you occupied enough so the rest of us didn't have to listen to your stupid whining.
Whining? That was your own falsetto assertions trying to get into a low enough sound are so people can hear you.
Theo wrote:
Whining? That was your own falsetto assertions trying to get into a low enough sound are so people can hear you.
All right, pray right now: what am I thinking about?
Theo
Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida
Dummy Boy wrote:
All right, pray right now: what am I thinking about?
What follows is a direct quote from your (ahem!) mind!
"He'll never guess what I'm thinking."
Theo wrote:
What follows is a direct quote from your (ahem!) mind!
"He'll never guess what I'm thinking."
Nope: Tell me about a dream I had a couple of nights ago. This is your last chance.
Theo
Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida
Dummy Boy wrote:
Nope: Tell me about a dream I had a couple of nights ago. This is your last chance.
YOU don't gert to tell me what to respond.
You said I could not tell what you were thinking.
Now you pretend you were not thinking
"He'll never guess what I'm thinking."
Everyone on the board recognizes your deceit when you now try to change it.
I don't jump through hoops for dummyboys who try to change the parameters.
Theo wrote:
YOU don't gert to tell me what to respond.
ooooo, good deflection. The first weapon of a good liar or politician.
Quote:
You said I could not tell what you were thinking.
No, I asked you to
tell me what I was thinking. And my response, after your response was: nope or you didn't get it right. I am very open minded about this sort of thing. The thought that you would pray and not get a message from me is a lack of faith on your part. I thought no such thing.
Quote:
Now you pretend you were not thinking
"He'll never guess what I'm thinking."
That's what you think, because that is actually a very logical response. Who reads minds.... your thinking "this guy's crazy", right?
Quote:
Everyone on the board recognizes your deceit when you now try to change it.
Let's see: the hallmark of being open minded is being open minded; and that's deceitful? Maybe, you ought to ask God to plant a dream in your head, ask God to recall it and of course it will be a dream that you and I share. I'm offering you an opportunity...there's nothing deceitful about it, except for someone who is deceitful: like yourself. No one else is interested in this conversation. You're assuming a lot about me. I am offering you an opportunity to bolster your faith and I am willing to be honest with you. Only some deceitful would think someone is deceitful. It's called reflection.
Quote:
I don't jump through hoops for dummyboys who try to change the parameters.
First of all, I'm not a multiple, wrong verb tense. That's all the stuff I'm thinking about right now. Oh and that you're a Notional Christian. I'll let you look that up. You Talk but don't actually follow the walk. Get back to me when you've had that dream. :-D
Theo
Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida
Dummy Boy wrote:
First of all, I'm not a multiple, wrong verb tense. That's all the stuff I'm thinking about right now. Oh and that you're a Notional Christian. I'll let you look that up. You Talk but don't actually follow the walk. Get back to me when you've had that dream. :-D
Don't need to.
If you want to deny thinking I can't know what you were thinking, that is a reflection on you, not me. You post demonstrated that.
Theo wrote:
Don't need to.
If you want to deny thinking I can't know what you were thinking, that is a reflection on you, not me. You post demonstrated that.
You haven't responded....who's not thinking?
And who doesn't have faith in anyone but themselves: YOU
Psychopath, control freak!
Theo
Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida
Dummy Boy wrote:
You haven't responded....who's not thinking?
And who doesn't have faith in anyone but themselves: YOU
Psychopath, control freak!
Oh, I see...
You think you have the authority to tell me what to pray for so YOU can test my God.
Doesn't work that way.
My prayers are my own communications to my God, and are not up for public display, and most certainly not up for your manipulation.
Neither myself nor any reader on the board had to ask G
od what you were thinking. It was obviated by your verbiage.
Now you want to alter the terms of the contest by changing the parameters.
It will be much easier on your ego to simply admit you thought "He will not know what I am thinking."
As for your accusation of "not responding" - why are you sending me post-messages then?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.