One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Obama Guilty of Treason???
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jun 15, 2013 12:30:14   #
donnieadair
 
I love all the Patriots who are unafraid to speak the t***h.

Reply
Jun 15, 2013 12:44:03   #
The Dutchman
 
donnieadair wrote:
I am with you on this Dutchman.



Reply
Jun 15, 2013 13:00:04   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
alex wrote:
when Bush promised them the weapons was before the muslim brother-hood took over


BUT when Obama made good on the promise the Brotherhood had already taken over and that tells me too much about Obama and what he may be thinking on his trip to Africa, upcoming. He may decide to stay there in order to avoid what seems to be coming to him here with all the scandals.

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2013 13:03:58   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
oldroy wrote:
BUT when Obama made good on the promise the Brotherhood had already taken over and that tells me too much about Obama and what he may be thinking on his trip to Africa, upcoming. He may decide to stay there in order to avoid what seems to be coming to him here with all the scandals.


Quid Pro Quo, oldroy: I hope your insite is correct.

HEY OBAMA:



Reply
Jun 15, 2013 13:14:17   #
ralphga
 
if you have this so called evidence why has it not gone public, you sound just like a Fox news commentator, all bluster and no evidence, your alleged evidence is all hearsay and conjecture. Get real, you sound so phony.

Reply
Jun 15, 2013 13:25:24   #
The Dutchman
 
ralphga wrote:
if you have this so called evidence why has it not gone public, you sound just like a Fox news commentator, all bluster and no evidence, your alleged evidence is all hearsay and conjecture. Get real, you sound so phony.


Ok, ralphga, obviously your one of the useless useful i***ts as defined by history here:
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-2341-1.html
Why don't you at least have the decency to learn how to reply to whom before you jump in with your bovine excrement.
Remove your cranium and it's contents from here and try again!

Reply
Jun 15, 2013 13:57:34   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
ralphga wrote:
if you have this so called evidence why has it not gone public, you sound just like a Fox news commentator, all bluster and no evidence, your alleged evidence is all hearsay and conjecture. Get real, you sound so phony.


Quid Pro Quo, repug: As in repugnant. Is that the best you can do for your first post repug? All you provided is a subjective personal attack, with no evidence whatsoever; while exhibiting preening yourself. OMG you also admit watching Fox news. Be careful, the brain dead libs will send you to Gitmo. Say repug, strap on your heavy equipment and get ready to have your lemming butt scalded. Now run your mouth with your best drivel.

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2013 16:49:13   #
Katfish
 
Why was there never any concern for the aid to Egypt when Bush was handing out the money?

The Bush administration has adamantly defended its annual outlay of nearly $2 billion in military and economic aid to Egypt in response to a Congressional debate on the issue. The White House has insisted that US strategic interests in the Middle East would be harmed by any reduction in its assistance to Egypt’s dictatorial regime.

Egypt, led by President Hosni Mubarak, receives more US aid than any other country save Israel. Washington provides $1.3 billion in annual military aid, a sum which amounts to 80 percent of the Egyptian military’s budget. Additional economic aid, which is tied to the country’s ongoing pro-business economic reform, is also directed to Mubarak each year.

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2006/05/egyp-m22.html

Reply
Jun 15, 2013 18:11:00   #
The Dutchman
 
Katfish wrote:
Why was there never any concern for the aid to Egypt when Bush was handing out the money?
Because back then Egypt was not controlled by the obozo's muslim brotherhood as it is today. Mohamed Morsi is the present head radical muslim in power there and is one of the leading members of the muslim brotherhood!
The Bush administration has adamantly defended its annual outlay of nearly $2 billion in military and economic aid to Egypt in response to a Congressional debate on the issue.
Back then Egypt and the U.S. were allies unlike today where it's leaders call for the total destruction of Israel & America! Do you think we should continue to support our enemies?
The White House has insisted that US strategic interests in the Middle East would be harmed by any reduction in its assistance to Egypt’s dictatorial regime.

Egypt, led by President Hosni Mubarak, receives more US aid than any other country save Israel. Washington provides $1.3 billion in annual military aid, a sum which amounts to 80 percent of the Egyptian military’s budget. Additional economic aid, which is tied to the country’s ongoing pro-business economic reform, is also directed to Mubarak each year.

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2006/05/egyp-m22.html
u Why was there never any concern for the aid to ... (show quote)


Your question may well get a lot more responce if you were to post it as a "New Topic"?

Reply
Jun 15, 2013 18:27:31   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
Katfish wrote:
Why was there never any concern for the aid to Egypt when Bush was handing out the money?

The Bush administration has adamantly defended its annual outlay of nearly $2 billion in military and economic aid to Egypt in response to a Congressional debate on the issue. The White House has insisted that US strategic interests in the Middle East would be harmed by any reduction in its assistance to Egypt’s dictatorial regime.

Egypt, led by President Hosni Mubarak, receives more US aid than any other country save Israel. Washington provides $1.3 billion in annual military aid, a sum which amounts to 80 percent of the Egyptian military’s budget. Additional economic aid, which is tied to the country’s ongoing pro-business economic reform, is also directed to Mubarak each year.

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2006/05/egyp-m22.html
Why was there never any concern for the aid to Egy... (show quote)


While Mubarak was a muslim dictator he had more sense than obozo's buddies in the muslim brotherhood if you are too blind to comprehend that you must be a liberal

Reply
Jun 15, 2013 18:40:24   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
alex wrote:
While Mubarak was a muslim dictator he had more sense than obozo's buddies in the muslim brotherhood if you are too blind to comprehend that you must be a liberal


The funniest thing about these progs is that they really think they can work with the Muslims to destroy our government and then the Brotherhood will allow them to take over. They seem purely stupid to the fact that the Muslims use long, curved swords to lop off heads while they will never fight back against the Muslims. They are helping establish the worldwide Caliph**e and will find themselves living as dhimmis or dead, one or the other.

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2013 18:41:44   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
The Dutchman wrote:
Your question may well get a lot more responce if you were to post it as a "New Topic"?


I don't think that the catfish has any ideas about who governs Egypt today and who did it when Mubarak was in control. Nobody is going to tell him any different than progs think, either.

Reply
Jun 15, 2013 20:07:49   #
Katfish
 
You guys are so funny. Acting as if you know something either others do not know, or have their facts wrong. When this deal was struck Mubarak was still in power. I have a hard time believing you would want the US to back out of the deal, and destroy the credibility of the US overseas. That is not how we do business.
Your blind hatred of Muslim's is sad to say the least. I would bet none of you have ever taken the time to actually get to know anyone that had a distinctly different religion than what your use to. Your loss, live in that box, but please close the lid!
Pretending someone doesn't know things is childish, (yes your childish). As was pointed out in a previous post by the mouth breathing "Oldroy", we all have a computer in front of us. Comprehension however is a personal thing, so without the h**e, and the bigotry many people will not see things as the local rethuglicans.

Reply
Jun 15, 2013 20:13:02   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
Katfish wrote:
You guys are so funny. Acting as if you know something other either do not know, or have their facts wrong. When this deal was struck Mubarak was still in power. I have a hard time believing you would want the US to back out of the deal, and destroy the credibility of the US overseas. That is not how we do business.
Your blind hatred of Muslim's is sad to say the least. I would bet none of you have ever taken the time to actually get to know anyone that had a distinctly different religion than what your use to. Your loss, live in that box, but please close the lid!
Pretending someone doesn't know things is childish, (yes your childish). As was pointed out in a previous post by the mouth breathing "Oldroy", we all have a computer in front of us. Comprehension however is a personal thing, so without the h**e, and the bigotry many people will not see things as the local rethuglicans.
You guys are so funny. Acting as if you know somet... (show quote)


oldroy, you take this I don't like to argue with i***ts

Reply
Jun 15, 2013 20:19:13   #
Katfish
 
Good idea Alex your obviously a little slower than oldroy.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.