Coos Bay Tom wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-impeachment-even-house-republicans-own-witnesses-see-no-evidence-of-wrongdoing/ar-AA1hpHuL?ocid=msedgdhphdr&cvid=21ea719f5e8a4b7abd7529068ae21645&ei=215#image=BB1gLBQV|1
"The bottom line is that the committee has shown the Bidens alone brought in over $15 million in their foreign influence peddling, over $24 million if you account for their associate's earnings from the schemes," Comer said.
"We have established in the first phase of this investigation where this money has come from Ukraine, Romania, Russia, Kazakhstan, China; it didn't come from selling anything legitimate," he continued. "It largely went unreported to the IRS. It was funneled through shell companies and third parties to hide the Biden's fingerprints."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrats-new-h****r-biden-talking-point-biden-only-guilty-of-being-a-loving-fatherAnd it isn't based on a f**e dossier.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-impeachment-even-house-republicans-own-witnesses-see-no-evidence-of-wrongdoing/ar-AA1hpHuL?ocid=msedgdhphdr&cvid=21ea719f5e8a4b7abd7529068ae21645&ei=215#image=BB1gLBQV|1
These links never work for mw - they just go to a page with a bunch of articles
IMO his impeachment is a waste of time. We have serious issues to deal with and don’t need this distraction.
Besides, we’d end up with Harris and she’d be even worse.
American Vet wrote:
"The bottom line is that the committee has shown the Bidens alone brought in over $15 million in their foreign influence peddling, over $24 million if you account for their associate's earnings from the schemes," Comer said.
"We have established in the first phase of this investigation where this money has come from Ukraine, Romania, Russia, Kazakhstan, China; it didn't come from selling anything legitimate," he continued. "It largely went unreported to the IRS. It was funneled through shell companies and third parties to hide the Biden's fingerprints."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrats-new-h****r-biden-talking-point-biden-only-guilty-of-being-a-loving-father"The bottom line is that the committee has sh... (
show quote)
If H****r is guilty of wrong doing and it looks like he has then it is him that will pay the price . There is nothing on president Biden at this point but I am sure you want there to be --FJB is one of your favorite phrases .
Rose42 wrote:
These links never work for mw - they just go to a page with a bunch of articles
IMO his impeachment is a waste of time. We have serious issues to deal with and don’t need this distraction.
Besides, we’d end up with Harris and she’d be even worse.
Sorry the link doesn't work for you . Msn is my server here and I can't do anything about it .
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
If H****r is guilty of wrong doing and it looks like he has then it is him that will pay the price . There is nothing on president Biden at this point but I am sure you want there to be --FJB is one of your favorite phrases .
Of course I want him punished for the horrible things he and his 'handlers' have done to America. Don't you?
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
If H****r is guilty of wrong doing and it looks like he has then it is him that will pay the price . There is nothing on president Biden at this point but I am sure you want there to be --FJB is one of your favorite phrases .
There is no evidence that would make you admit Joe Biden did anything wrong. Just admit it.
Liberty Tree wrote:
There is no evidence that would make you admit Joe Biden did anything wrong. Just admit it.
If there is evidence I will believe it . I am not like trump supporters who believe he is an innocent victm of Democrat plotting .
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
If there is evidence I will believe it . I am not like trump supporters who believe he is an innocent victm of Democrat plotting .
No you will not. You say you will if there is evidence, but every evidence presented you will discount or try to spin away. Time will prove me right.
Liberty Tree wrote:
No you will not. You say you will if there is evidence, but every evidence presented you will discount or try to spin away. Time will prove me right.
I don't need any time to be right about you .
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I don't need any time to be right about you .
Because you know I understand who you really are in spite of the image you try to present. You cannot BS me and you cannot stand it.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
If there is evidence I will believe it . I am not like trump supporters who believe he is an innocent victm of Democrat plotting .
The evidence is pretty clear. I believe I would have to say that you are choosing to not believe the evidence.
"The bottom line is that the committee has shown the Bidens alone brought in over $15 million in their foreign influence peddling, over $24 million if you account for their associate's earnings from the schemes," Comer said.
"We have established in the first phase of this investigation where this money has come from Ukraine, Romania, Russia, Kazakhstan, China; it didn't come from selling anything legitimate," he continued. "It largely went unreported to the IRS. It was funneled through shell companies and third parties to hide the Biden's fingerprints."https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrats-new-h****r-biden-talking-point-biden-only-guilty-of-being-a-loving-fatherAnd, unlike the proven f**e dossier concocted by the democrats, it is real. And a lot of it.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-impeachment-even-house-republicans-own-witnesses-see-no-evidence-of-wrongdoing/ar-AA1hpHuL?ocid=msedgdhphdr&cvid=21ea719f5e8a4b7abd7529068ae21645&ei=215#image=BB1gLBQV|1
The experts called to testify by the Republican committees as "expert witnesses" to whether there was enough credible evidence to open an impeachment inquiry, not as "firsthand witnesses" as alluded to and stated incorrectly by Dem Rep AOC.
An expert witness is a person with specialized knowledge, sk**ls, education, or experience in a particular field who is called upon to provide their expertise in legal proceedings to assist the court with understanding complex technical or scientific issues.
Firsthand knowledge refers to something which the witness actually saw or heard, as distinguished from something he learned from some other person or source. It is also a knowledge that is gained through firsthand observation or experience, as distinguished from a belief based on what someone else has said.
Justice101 wrote:
The experts called to testify by the Republican committees as "expert witnesses" to whether there was enough credible evidence to open an impeachment inquiry, not as "firsthand witnesses" as alluded to and stated incorrectly by Dem Rep AOC.
An expert witness is a person with specialized knowledge, sk**ls, education, or experience in a particular field who is called upon to provide their expertise in legal proceedings to assist the court with understanding complex technical or scientific issues.
Firsthand knowledge refers to something which the witness actually saw or heard, as distinguished from something he learned from some other person or source. It is also a knowledge that is gained through firsthand observation or experience, as distinguished from a belief based on what someone else has said.
The experts called to testify by the Republican co... (
show quote)
Thankyou for the explanation of what an expert witness is .
Liberty Tree wrote:
Because you know I understand who you really are in spite of the image you try to present. You cannot BS me and you cannot stand it.
What you are I once was--What I am you never will be .
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.