Strycker wrote:
Banks don't generally do their own appraisals. What they do is either accept or reject the borrowers number. In Trump's case the lender simply accepted Trump's opinion of what the value was. From what little facts I know, the Judges opinion was excessively low. Trumps was excessively high. That's the nature of appraisals. Appraisals are very subjective. Recently I fought the county property appraisal on one of my properties that they raised by 50%. I eventually got the appraisal lowered by 33%. A considerable amount. Was I committing fraud for disagreeing with the county appraisal? Was the county guilty of fraud in over appraising the value?
Banks don't generally do their own appraisals. Wha... (
show quote)
The diff being that you are trying to lower the taxable value. Not fraud.
Here is an exerpt from a ruling against a banker who practiced poor banking
(a) Respondent failed to comply with the Bank’s internal, lending policies and
procedures, including the requirements that loans and loan renewals be
presented to the Bank’s loan committee; that loans include independent
valuations of property and assignment of collateral; and that loans not
exceed Respondent’s individual lending authority.
(b) Respondent originated and administered commercial loans in an unsafe or
unsound manner, including loans with inappropriate underwriting,
excessive loan-to-value ratios, and insufficient financial analysis.
(c) Respondent failed to secure Bank collateral, and released collateral
without receiving corresponding pay-downs on outstanding loan balances
or obtaining substitution of collateral.
(d) Respondent ordered the disbursement of loan proceeds directly to a
borrower instead of to the dealer in loan secured by a new vehicle
purchase
I simply cannot fathom loaning amounts of the magnitude we are referring to without having to get independent appraisals. I guess it could be debated after that but at least there would be a basis to begin the debate.