Poll: Do you believe there is v***r f***d present in our e******ns? (Page 2): Nope, just waiting for you to post your evidence/proof for you ridiculous claim.

American Vet

federally indicted mattoid wrote:

Are you having a stroke?

Blink twice if you need help

Nope, just waiting for you to post your evidence/proof for you ridiculous claim.

federally indicted mattoid

https://the2020e******n.org/v**er-fraud-convictions-since-2016/

This link has both 2016 & 2020 e******n f***d cases and their disposition. Betcha can't guess who most of the fraud was commited by ;)

https://www.npr.org/2023/01/14/1149249686/iowa-52-counts-v**er-fraud

Local e******n - republican

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRH3gl9u3EU

Great summary - bet you don't want to watch it.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/21/politics/fact-check-republicans-v**er-fraud-kirk-hartle/index.html

and I could find more, but this seems sufficient.

American Vet

federally indicted mattoid wrote:

https://the2020e******n.org/v**er-fraud-conviction... (show quote)

Invalid. The first link has incomplete data. The others are anecdotal.

I suggest you take classes in statistical analysis and logic.

federally indicted mattoid

American Vet wrote:

Invalid. The first link has incomplete data. The others are anecdotal.

I suggest you take classes in statistical analysis and logic.

They are not, but I know you like the low information sound bites.

American Vet

federally indicted mattoid wrote:

They are not, but I know you like the low information sound bites.

Exactly what does ‘they are not’ mean?

federally indicted mattoid

American Vet wrote:

Exactly what does ‘they are not’ mean?

Not anecdotal

They were tried, convicted and the record is attached to the link.

American Vet

federally indicted mattoid wrote:

Not anecdotal

They were tried, convicted and the record is attached to the link.

You obviously do not know the meaning of anecdotal.

There is a lot that you think you know. As President Reagan said: “The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.” Unfortunately the ignorant part is not applicable to you.

federally indicted mattoid

American Vet wrote:

You obviously do not know the meaning of anecdotal.

There is a lot that you think you know. As President Reagan said: “The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.” Unfortunately the ignorant part is not applicable to you.

I think that might be you who does not know the meaning of anecdotal. Here it is - you may learn something today:

"not necessarily true or reliable, because based on personal accounts rather than facts or research."

Or:

"based on or consisting of reports or observations of usually unscientific observers"

American Vet

federally indicted mattoid wrote:

I think that might be you who does not know the meaning of anecdotal. Here it is - you may learn something today:

"not necessarily true or reliable, because based on personal accounts rather than facts or research."

Or:

"based on or consisting of reports or observations of usually unscientific observers"

Also “Based on casual observations or indications rather than rigorous or scientific analysis.”

You base your comments on those three links:

The first was invalid since it was incomplete.

The other 2 were anecdotal in that they were limited in scope and not ‘rigorously’ analyzed.

Additionally, I will add that you presented an extremely short timeline; ergo, incomplete data.

Justice101

fullspinzoo wrote:

https://conservativeunderground.net/do-you-believe-there-is-v**er-fraud-present-in-our-e******ns/

Yes, of course! As long as there is no-excuse mail-in b****ts allowed, and the v**er rolls are not cleaned/updated there will be v***r f***d.

https://nypost.com/2020/08/29/political-insider-explains-v**er-fraud-with-mail-in-b****ts/

Big dog

fullspinzoo wrote:

https://conservativeunderground.net/do-you-believe-there-is-v**er-fraud-present-in-our-e******ns/

Absolutely.

Jim0001 Loc: originally from Tennessee, now Virginia, USA

fullspinzoo wrote:

https://conservativeunderground.net/do-you-believe-there-is-v**er-fraud-present-in-our-e******ns/

Absolutely and the longer period of time v****g is allowed, the more time there is to subvert the will of the people!

ONE E******N DAY for everyone, to include the absentee v**es being on hand on that day. AND a requirement that v**e results should be tabulated not more than a 12-hour period after the polls close. There should also be one time when the states are called (in alphabetical order)....

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

fullspinzoo wrote:

https://conservativeunderground.net/do-you-believe-there-is-v**er-fraud-present-in-our-e******ns/

No question about it.

RickyDCUSMC

Jim0001 wrote:

Absolutely and the longer period of time v****g is allowed, the more time there is to subvert the will of the people!

ONE E******N DAY for everyone, to include the absentee v**es being on hand on that day. AND a requirement that v**e results should be tabulated not more than a 12-hour period after the polls close. There should also be one time when the states are called (in alphabetical order)....

It's scary and funny, I remember when everyone v**ed on e******n day and you knew the results in 99% of the contests by midnight! The scary part is we will probably never have that ability or clarity again! I have only v**ed absentee once, I was in Da Nang.

Knightlady

RickyDCUSMC wrote:

It's scary and funny, I remember when everyone v**ed on e******n day and you knew the results in 99% of the contests by midnight! The scary part is we will probably never have that ability or clarity again! I have only v**ed absentee once, I was in Da Nang.

I remember that too. Was nice instead of waiting a month