What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?
Fire!!!!...reload and fire again.
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?
They would say put them away before The insanity can spread.
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?
it's immaterial
sex is a personal issue .it has nothing to do with the Constitution
What we are seeing today ,is not about what they claim it is .
You need to understand these issues are created ,and forced out through the media to distract ,and confuse .When I was a kid growing up ,I knew about stuff but it wasn't the topic of the day ,every day .Whats happning is an obsession ,a brainwashing a pile of propoganda to divide the citizenry ,and cause unrest .The government fears our power ,if we become united .
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?
Is this really an argument???
What would they say about women v****g???
Or b****s being free???
Or income tax???
Think arguments through before you post them...
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?
You might ask what they thought about the age of consent while you're at it because I can guarantee you it was a damn site lower then then now. Thing like what you ask were not frowned upon just not flaunted like today..
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Is this really an argument???
What would they say about women v****g???
Or b****s being free???
Or income tax???
Think arguments through before you post them...
That's why we will end up having to kick Canada's ass.
Carry on.
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Is this really an argument???
What would they say about women v****g???
Or b****s being free???
Or income tax???
Think arguments through before you post them...
Yes it IS an argument when all this g****r confusion is affecting our kids!! In today`s world they would have no problem with women v****g or b****s being free but would call the income tax un-Constitutional!
I saw a cartoon that was different:
DATING 2023
( a couple walking along holding hands)
He looks at her and asks:
" Have you been female all your life?"
Sad what our nation is becoming.
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Is this really an argument???
What would they say about women v****g???
Or b****s being free???
Or income tax???
Think arguments through before you post them...
The founding fathers were radicals but they didn't like s***ery. It was already established when they formed the new country and it took over eighty years to be rid of it completely. Income tax kinda brought it back by making us wage s***es. Men declaring themselves women would be locked up in an insane asylum if their folks weren't rich enough to keep them locked away at home. They would have been more tolerant to women v**ers as long as they were property owners which was a ludicrous idea. I don't think the most progressive of them could have imagined how our nation turned out.
nonalien1 wrote:
The founding fathers were radicals but they didn't like s***ery. It was already established when they formed the new country and it took over eighty years to be rid of it completely. Income tax kinda brought it back by making us wage s***es. Men declaring themselves women would be locked up in an insane asylum if their folks weren't rich enough to keep them locked away at home. They would have been more tolerant to women v**ers as long as they were property owners which was a ludicrous idea. I don't think the most progressive of them could have imagined how our nation turned out.
The founding fathers were radicals but they didn't... (
show quote)
Well reasoned...
Cross dressers existed in their time...
I doubt they would put up with this nonsense...
Jim0001
Loc: originally from Tennessee, now Virginia, USA
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Is this really an argument???
What would they say about women v****g???
Or b****s being free???
Or income tax???
Think arguments through before you post them...
I would say you are in China (your claim) and have no dog in the fight. Neither does RR.
solarkin wrote:
it's immaterial
sex is a personal issue .it has nothing to do with the Constitution
What we are seeing today ,is not about what they claim it is .
You need to understand these issues are created ,and forced out through the media to distract ,and confuse .When I was a kid growing up ,I knew about stuff but it wasn't the topic of the day ,every day .Whats happning is an obsession ,a brainwashing a pile of propoganda to divide the citizenry ,and cause unrest .The government fears our power ,if we become united .
it's immaterial br sex is a personal issue .it h... (
show quote)
No, this isn't about sex. This is a mental health issue.
Wickedestoldwolf wrote:
You might ask what they thought about the age of consent while you're at it because I can guarantee you it was a damn site lower then then now. Thing like what you ask were not frowned upon just not flaunted like today..
That's true but remember people had shorter life spans then and mature a lot faster.
microphor wrote:
That's true but remember people had shorter life spans then and mature a lot faster.
Not necessarily shorter life spans. Just a lot of babies not making it to five years old. If you made it to puberty there was a good chance you could live to 80 or 90. Statistics and averages don't tell the whole story. We lost a couple years off our life spans due to C***D, but it doesn't mean we will all die two years sooner
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.