One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
An Honest Question On T***s
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 1, 2023 17:42:05   #
Liberty Tree
 
What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?

Reply
Sep 1, 2023 18:09:21   #
liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?




Fire!!!!...reload and fire again.

Reply
Sep 1, 2023 18:13:38   #
Michael Roy Loc: North of Amarillo
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?


They would say put them away before The insanity can spread.

Reply
 
 
Sep 1, 2023 19:03:24   #
solarkin
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?


it's immaterial
sex is a personal issue .it has nothing to do with the Constitution
What we are seeing today ,is not about what they claim it is .
You need to understand these issues are created ,and forced out through the media to distract ,and confuse .When I was a kid growing up ,I knew about stuff but it wasn't the topic of the day ,every day .Whats happning is an obsession ,a brainwashing a pile of propoganda to divide the citizenry ,and cause unrest .The government fears our power ,if we become united .

Reply
Sep 2, 2023 05:56:05   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?


Is this really an argument???

What would they say about women v****g???
Or b****s being free???
Or income tax???

Think arguments through before you post them...

Reply
Sep 2, 2023 11:23:42   #
Wickedestoldwolf
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you think the founding fathers would say about men declaring themselves to be women?


You might ask what they thought about the age of consent while you're at it because I can guarantee you it was a damn site lower then then now. Thing like what you ask were not frowned upon just not flaunted like today..

Reply
Sep 2, 2023 12:09:31   #
liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Is this really an argument???

What would they say about women v****g???
Or b****s being free???
Or income tax???

Think arguments through before you post them...




That's why we will end up having to kick Canada's ass.

Carry on.

Reply
 
 
Sep 2, 2023 13:43:21   #
martsiva
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Is this really an argument???

What would they say about women v****g???
Or b****s being free???
Or income tax???

Think arguments through before you post them...


Yes it IS an argument when all this g****r confusion is affecting our kids!! In today`s world they would have no problem with women v****g or b****s being free but would call the income tax un-Constitutional!

Reply
Sep 2, 2023 14:18:27   #
okie don
 
I saw a cartoon that was different:

DATING 2023
( a couple walking along holding hands)
He looks at her and asks:
" Have you been female all your life?"

Sad what our nation is becoming.

Reply
Sep 2, 2023 16:03:12   #
nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Is this really an argument???

What would they say about women v****g???
Or b****s being free???
Or income tax???

Think arguments through before you post them...



The founding fathers were radicals but they didn't like s***ery. It was already established when they formed the new country and it took over eighty years to be rid of it completely. Income tax kinda brought it back by making us wage s***es. Men declaring themselves women would be locked up in an insane asylum if their folks weren't rich enough to keep them locked away at home. They would have been more tolerant to women v**ers as long as they were property owners which was a ludicrous idea. I don't think the most progressive of them could have imagined how our nation turned out.

Reply
Sep 3, 2023 00:01:46   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
nonalien1 wrote:
The founding fathers were radicals but they didn't like s***ery. It was already established when they formed the new country and it took over eighty years to be rid of it completely. Income tax kinda brought it back by making us wage s***es. Men declaring themselves women would be locked up in an insane asylum if their folks weren't rich enough to keep them locked away at home. They would have been more tolerant to women v**ers as long as they were property owners which was a ludicrous idea. I don't think the most progressive of them could have imagined how our nation turned out.
The founding fathers were radicals but they didn't... (show quote)


Well reasoned...
Cross dressers existed in their time...
I doubt they would put up with this nonsense...

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2023 07:31:13   #
Jim0001 Loc: originally from Tennessee, now Virginia, USA
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Is this really an argument???

What would they say about women v****g???
Or b****s being free???
Or income tax???

Think arguments through before you post them...


I would say you are in China (your claim) and have no dog in the fight. Neither does RR.

Reply
Sep 4, 2023 10:38:23   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
solarkin wrote:
it's immaterial
sex is a personal issue .it has nothing to do with the Constitution
What we are seeing today ,is not about what they claim it is .
You need to understand these issues are created ,and forced out through the media to distract ,and confuse .When I was a kid growing up ,I knew about stuff but it wasn't the topic of the day ,every day .Whats happning is an obsession ,a brainwashing a pile of propoganda to divide the citizenry ,and cause unrest .The government fears our power ,if we become united .
it's immaterial br sex is a personal issue .it h... (show quote)


No, this isn't about sex. This is a mental health issue.

Reply
Sep 4, 2023 10:39:51   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Wickedestoldwolf wrote:
You might ask what they thought about the age of consent while you're at it because I can guarantee you it was a damn site lower then then now. Thing like what you ask were not frowned upon just not flaunted like today..


That's true but remember people had shorter life spans then and mature a lot faster.

Reply
Sep 4, 2023 21:09:28   #
nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert
 
microphor wrote:
That's true but remember people had shorter life spans then and mature a lot faster.


Not necessarily shorter life spans. Just a lot of babies not making it to five years old. If you made it to puberty there was a good chance you could live to 80 or 90. Statistics and averages don't tell the whole story. We lost a couple years off our life spans due to C***D, but it doesn't mean we will all die two years sooner

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.