One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The GOP Establishment Will Try And Sctrew Us Again
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Dec 22, 2014 11:38:21   #
Yankee Clipper
 
carolyn wrote:
That would be almost as good as a Cruz/Gowdy ticket. Now that would be a pair that would knock both the Republican and Democrat parties on their butts.


Cruz is ineligible (that natural born citizen thing) besides being a Rino. Gowdy is a good choice, I believe.

Reply
Dec 22, 2014 20:44:27   #
carolyn
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Cruz is ineligible (that natural born citizen thing) besides being a Rino. Gowdy is a good choice, I believe.


You call Cruz a RINO? Do you even know what the letters RINO mean?

Reply
Dec 22, 2014 23:55:38   #
Yankee Clipper
 
carolyn wrote:
You call Cruz a RINO? Do you even know what the letters RINO mean?


Yep, I sure do. He's for amnesty and a few other things I can't think of right this minute. But no matter he's not eligible anyway. Republican In Name Only We'll have to just disagree on this one.

Reply
 
 
Dec 23, 2014 11:12:10   #
carolyn
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Yep, I sure do. He's for amnesty and a few other things I can't think of right this minute. But no matter he's not eligible anyway. Republican In Name Only We'll have to just disagree on this one.


I follow Ted Cruz very closely because he is one of the few that I favor, and I have never heard him even mention the fact that he was for amnesty. Are you sure you weren't listening to one of the shadow left-wingers that post on here sometimes that claim to be right wing but are as left-wing as Obummer himself? You know we have some that are posing as right-wing but are actually left-wing implants that try and brainwash the weaker-minded into agreeing with them.

Reply
Dec 23, 2014 11:30:15   #
carolyn
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Yep, I sure do. He's for amnesty and a few other things I can't think of right this minute. But no matter he's not eligible anyway. Republican In Name Only We'll have to just disagree on this one.


hen you evidently have a screw loose somewhere because I am posting three websites that show Ted Cruz is not for amnesty, and what he tried recently was to thwart Harry Reid's plan to bypass the amnesty v**e. I suggest you either start paying attention to right-wing information or just go ahead and admit that you are actually a left-wing mole.

www.tedcruz.org/stop-amnesty

www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/immigration-i******s-amnesty...

www.wnd.com/2014/12/ted-cruz-why-i-tried-to-block-amnesty

Reply
Dec 23, 2014 11:51:13   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
Yankee Clipper-the ACA is the law of the land and will not be repealed as long as Obama is president. The only hope is that the SCOTUS will find parts of it unconstitutional and that it self destructs. As for amnesty, it is only funded until Feb 27,2015. It will be thoroughly debated in Jan/Feb. Realistically, however, the republicans do not have the v**es to defund the Obama action. You know that Obama will veto any attempt at defunding so the only way it dies is if the democrats join in and override the veto (67 v**es in the Senate and 291 in the House). What are the odds? The courts could find the Obama action unconstitutional thereby rendering it null and void. The republicans need to make their point to the American people and move on. We do not need a government shut down or a week long dog and pony show. PS-Cruz is not for amnesty. He is for legal immigration. Why do you think the put on the Senate show which disrupted the Senators' weekend plans and angered both democrats and republicans ?
He is not ready for the presidency but is just as eligible as is Obama. When selecting a candidate we must consider that our pick has to satisfy the independents because ,without them, we cannot win the White House. Good Luck America !!!

Reply
Dec 23, 2014 14:44:44   #
Yankee Clipper
 
carolyn wrote:
hen you evidently have a screw loose somewhere because I am posting three websites that show Ted Cruz is not for amnesty, and what he tried recently was to thwart Harry Reid's plan to bypass the amnesty v**e. I suggest you either start paying attention to right-wing information or just go ahead and admit that you are actually a left-wing mole.

www.tedcruz.org/stop-amnesty

www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/immigration-i******s-amnesty...

www.wnd.com/2014/12/ted-cruz-why-i-tried-to-block-amnesty

Here's some for you:

http://shark-tank.com/2013/04/23/rubio-shamefully-attacks-conservatives-over-immigration-reform/

http://shark-tank.com/2013/04/23/rubio-shamefully-attacks-conservatives-over-immigration-reform/

http://twitchy.com/2014/08/27/chameleon-marco-rubio-changes-his-amnesty-colors-again/

You misunderstand me, I like Rubio, but he's changed his mind on immigration a time or two, when will he change again? Also you keep ignoring the fact that he is ineligible for the office of President.
hen you evidently have a screw loose somewhere bec... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Dec 23, 2014 14:48:05   #
Yankee Clipper
 
Ricko wrote:
Yankee Clipper-the ACA is the law of the land and will not be repealed as long as Obama is president. The only hope is that the SCOTUS will find parts of it unconstitutional and that it self destructs. As for amnesty, it is only funded until Feb 27,2015. It will be thoroughly debated in Jan/Feb. Realistically, however, the republicans do not have the v**es to defund the Obama action. You know that Obama will veto any attempt at defunding so the only way it dies is if the democrats join in and override the veto (67 v**es in the Senate and 291 in the House). What are the odds? The courts could find the Obama action unconstitutional thereby rendering it null and void. The republicans need to make their point to the American people and move on. We do not need a government shut down or a week long dog and pony show. PS-Cruz is not for amnesty. He is for legal immigration. Why do you think the put on the Senate show which disrupted the Senators' weekend plans and angered both democrats and republicans ?
He is not ready for the presidency but is just as eligible as is Obama. When selecting a candidate we must consider that our pick has to satisfy the independents because ,without them, we cannot win the White House. Good Luck America !!!
Yankee Clipper-the ACA is the law of the land and ... (show quote)


Obama is an usurping Marxist bastard. He is ineligible because his father was a British subject at the time of his birth, he is not a natural born citizen and neither is Cruz.

Reply
Dec 23, 2014 16:38:36   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
carolyn wrote:
What useful purpose would it serve for the v****g public to know who all are for amnesty and who are against it? My God man, why do you even ask such a foolish question? It is for the benefit of every American to know who is the turncoats and who aren't, and who will fight for the people and who won't. This way we can make a decision in 2016 as to who to v**e for and who to kick out of their pud jobs. It is as simple as getting the knowledge out to the v**er so they can act accordingly at the polls.

I already have a dossier on just about every person I will not v**e for in 2016. I started it a year ago and it hasn't changed one bit so far. I am not saying I won't change it, but I will say the one's on my s**t list will have to do a whole lot better on their right-wing conservative showing if they want the support of me and my group. And some that have already proven themselves to be RINO'S are permanently on this list regardless of what happens between now and 2016.
What useful purpose would it serve for the v****g ... (show quote)



carolyn-so he wants to know who is for amnesty and who is against. As far as I know, only democrats are for it. Do your really think the v**ers will remember these antics in 2016? The reason republicans v**ed against Cruz was to get out of town. They knew he did not have the v**es so why play games. If you don't v**e for the republican candidate because you think he/she is a RINO then you could be electing a democrat. Your choice !!! Good Luck America !!!

Reply
Dec 23, 2014 16:42:39   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Obama is an usurping Marxist bastard. He is ineligible because his father was a British subject at the time of his birth, he is not a natural born citizen and neither is Cruz.


YC-agree that neither is a natural born citizen and somehow, Obama got a pass. What is good for one should be good for the other. Good Luck America !!!

Reply
Dec 23, 2014 19:14:34   #
Yankee Clipper
 
Ricko wrote:
YC-agree that neither is a natural born citizen and somehow, Obama got a pass. What is good for one should be good for the other. Good Luck America !!!


Heads will eventually roll for the gift of the usurper Marxist bastard. And to the real point, 2 wrongs doesn't make it right. Obola wouldn't be in office if any of the other branches of our government had any kind of spine. I am sure he will end up in prison or worse eventually, his time is coming.

Reply
 
 
Dec 23, 2014 20:33:43   #
carolyn
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Obama is an usurping Marxist bastard. He is ineligible because his father was a British subject at the time of his birth, he is not a natural born citizen and neither is Cruz.


But the powers to be overlooked the small fact that Obama was not an American citizen but they are going to make a big deal out of Cruz being born in Canada, eh? Now isn't that just like the left-wing crooks?

Reply
Dec 23, 2014 20:36:14   #
Yankee Clipper
 
carolyn wrote:
But the powers to be overlooked the small fact that Obama was not an American citizen but they are going to make a big deal out of Cruz being born in Canada, eh? Now isn't that just like the left-wing crooks?


YUP

Reply
Dec 23, 2014 20:50:03   #
carolyn
 
Now who are you talking about? You posted websites about Rubio when you first said Cruz. So whom are you actually talking about. As far as Rubio goes, I am not for him in the least because he has changed too many times for me. In fact, there are only about two or three in the Senate that I would be comfortable v****g for President, and that is Cruz, Lee and Palin. And I say Palin because she already showed her mettle when she was Governor of Alaska. She forced Big Oil to either s**t or get off the pot, and that was far more than several men governors had the guts to do.

Reply
Dec 24, 2014 21:43:38   #
Yankee Clipper
 
carolyn wrote:
Now who are you talking about? You posted websites about Rubio when you first said Cruz. So whom are you actually talking about. As far as Rubio goes, I am not for him in the least because he has changed too many times for me. In fact, there are only about two or three in the Senate that I would be comfortable v****g for President, and that is Cruz, Lee and Palin. And I say Palin because she already showed her mettle when she was Governor of Alaska. She forced Big Oil to either s**t or get off the pot, and that was far more than several men governors had the guts to do.
Now who are you talking about? You posted websites... (show quote)


Who are you addressing?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.