A good win for President Joe and the control of immegration..
Aug 3, 2023 21:55:43 #
The win was 2 to 1 in the 9th court of appeals... the dissent was judge Vand**e.. a trump judge who did not want Biden to control those coming over the border.. Just the same thing a different day... right wing judge fighting to prevent control of the border by Biden..
https://apnews.com/article/asylum-limits-biden-border-immigration-2e25db44d7a6c4b51fe0d9c07832318d?user_email=49da43db2f28765be37e4f4e6c3a9edf8898abd4ac6b5dc1d2c8baf9c57ba73c&utm_medium=APNews_Alerts&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_ca
WASHINGTON (AP) — An appeals court Thursday allowed a rule restricting asylum at the southern border to temporarily stay in place. The decision is a major win for the Biden administration, which had argued that the rule was integral to its efforts to maintain order along the U.S.-Mexico border.
The new rule makes it extremely difficult for people to be granted asylum unless they first seek protection in a country they’re traveling through on their way to the U.S. or apply online. It includes room for exceptions and does not apply to children traveling alone.
The decision by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals grants a temporary reprieve from a lower court decision that had found the policy illegal and ordered the government to end its use by this coming Monday. The government had gone quickly to the appeals court asking for the rule to be allowed to remain in use while the larger court battles surrounding its legality play out.
https://apnews.com/article/asylum-limits-biden-border-immigration-2e25db44d7a6c4b51fe0d9c07832318d?user_email=49da43db2f28765be37e4f4e6c3a9edf8898abd4ac6b5dc1d2c8baf9c57ba73c&utm_medium=APNews_Alerts&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_ca
WASHINGTON (AP) — An appeals court Thursday allowed a rule restricting asylum at the southern border to temporarily stay in place. The decision is a major win for the Biden administration, which had argued that the rule was integral to its efforts to maintain order along the U.S.-Mexico border.
The new rule makes it extremely difficult for people to be granted asylum unless they first seek protection in a country they’re traveling through on their way to the U.S. or apply online. It includes room for exceptions and does not apply to children traveling alone.
The decision by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals grants a temporary reprieve from a lower court decision that had found the policy illegal and ordered the government to end its use by this coming Monday. The government had gone quickly to the appeals court asking for the rule to be allowed to remain in use while the larger court battles surrounding its legality play out.
Aug 3, 2023 22:37:28 #
permafrost wrote:
The win was 2 to 1 in the 9th court of appeals... ... (show quote)
You misspelled immigration.
Aug 3, 2023 23:11:05 #
archie bunker wrote:
You misspelled immigration.
such a setback.. darn, how could that happen... blast... where was spell check when I needed her? Or did I not look.. darn,, it gets so complicated... dang it..
good thing you are smart enough to read it even when wrong.. some people can not do that.. Maybe they were the ones who said this was the correct way to spell the word... OH heck,,, i bet they did in on purpose.. just to make my evening less perfect.. the darn outlaws...
Well , now I feel much better, I blame them.. I Can sleep like a baby.. or a drunk... darn it... his old geezer crap is not what they promised when I signed on....
Aug 4, 2023 03:22:25 #
liberalhunter
Loc: Your mom's house
permafrost wrote:
The win was 2 to 1 in the 9th court of appeals... ... (show quote)
Control of the border??
Crazy old fool.
Aug 4, 2023 14:46:43 #
Aug 4, 2023 16:22:40 #
permafrost wrote:
The win was 2 to 1 in the 9th court of appeals... ... (show quote)
The illegal part is applying online.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.