Tea Party Republicans Stand Mute on Wall Street Bailouts: Citigroup wrote the legislation that lets Wall Street gamble on iffy derivative using federally insured bank deposit money.

MarvinSussman

Citigroup wrote the legislation that lets Wall Street gamble on iffy derivative using federally insured bank deposit money. Enough House Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats passed it to the Senate. There, the outrage was passed by the same culprits with only Senator Warren and her progressive caucus protesting the sellout to Wall Street.

That sets us up for the next crisis bailout, over which the Tea Party will scream bloody murder. But did Tea Party Republicans speak out against the outrage?? Quiet as a mouse.

Patriots? Like Benedict Arnold. When the time comes to fight against the l**ters, the White Trash turns tail and runs away.

By their fruits shall ye know them.

JMHO Loc: Utah

MarvinSussman wrote:

Citigroup wrote the legislation that lets Wall Str... (show quote)

Where does one even start on this colossal bunch of left-wing stupid blather? I'm not going to waste my time. Marvin, you're even more of an i***t than I originally thought. Have some more of that Kool Aid.

rkevin Loc: florida

MarvinSussman wrote:

Citigroup wrote the legislation that lets Wall Str... (show quote)

That's funny. The progressive movement is not only still trying to blame "Dubya," for everything the current administration is "regulating," [they] are trying to feign reversing the roles' now. Too late. "WE" have loop after loop after loop of exactly who you are; and the number of "card-carrying" Democrat [no Republican] anti-American politicians who have slithered into our government; while emasculating and devitalizing the likes of Sen. Joe McCarthy, Rush, Glenn, Levin, FOX, ad indigestion, in the process.
Funny peculiar, not funny ha ha. When the liberal progressive Democrats' initiated our "fundamental t***sformation" by starting the housing and financial crisis in 2006, our current "dear" leader was just a fanciful glimmer in the eyes of progressivism. Now the "glimmer" has come-and-gone, and the liberal progressive "regulations" that have been ungratefully foisted on America and our Western culture, can be "changed over a long weekend" [Art Laffer], but the damaging results may last a bit longer.
And the "Tea Party" never "screams bloody murder." Your thinking of the r**ting, l**ting gang-bangers, liberal progressives, Sharpton, Jackson, Holder, our "dear" leader, the New Black Panther Party and Islam!!! Got that?!?!?!?

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

MarvinSussman wrote:

Citigroup wrote the legislation that lets Wall Str... (show quote)

...and the other reason they are standing mute on immigration: They need tomato pickers and nail drivers-it has nothing to do with creating v**ers, but supporting real estate moguls and farmers.

WhosetheBoss Loc: Arkansas

Marvin I agree with you, t*****rs one and all, the corruption is still as bad if not worse than it was!!!

MarvinSussman

rkevin wrote:

That's funny. The progressive movement is not onl... (show quote)

An honest, rational, intelligent person who disagrees with a statement would quote the words and indicate the facts or logic with which he disagrees. You were and remain incapable of such an intelligent act.

You have failed your obligation to communicate effectively in a democratic society. You can only vituperate on a grammar school level.

Nature has failed you and you have failed society.

Everything I wrote makes sense and it destroys your fundamentalist beliefs in the nonsense you hold dearly.

You are frustrated and infuriated to the point of foaming at the mouth and spitting.

Your opprobrium is my reward. I am delighted by your antipathy.

MarvinSussman

JMHO wrote:

Where does one even start on this colossal bunch of left-wing stupid blather? I'm not going to waste my time. Marvin, you're even more of an i***t than I originally thought. Have some more of that Kool Aid.

An honest, rational, intelligent person who disagrees with a statement would quote the words and indicate the facts or logic with which he disagrees. You were and remain incapable of such an intelligent act.

You have failed your obligation to communicate effectively in a democratic society. You can only vituperate on a grammar school level.

Nature has failed you and you have failed society.

Everything I wrote makes sense and it destroys your fundamentalist beliefs in the nonsense you hold dearly.

You are frustrated and infuriated to the point of foaming at the mouth and spitting.

Your opprobrium is my reward. I am delighted by your antipathy.

MarvinSussman

rkevin wrote:

That's funny. The progressive movement is not onl... (show quote)

An honest, rational, intelligent person who disagrees with a statement would quote the words and indicate the facts or logic with which he disagrees. You were and remain incapable of such an intelligent act.

You have failed your obligation to communicate effectively in a democratic society. You can only vituperate on a grammar school level.

Nature has failed you and you have failed society.

Everything I wrote makes sense and it destroys your fundamentalist beliefs in the nonsense you hold dearly.

You are frustrated and infuriated to the point of foaming at the mouth and spitting.

Your opprobrium is my reward. I am delighted by your antipathy.

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

MarvinSussman wrote:

Citigroup wrote the legislation that lets Wall Str... (show quote)

Perhaps you missed a simple reality - in both Houses it was the so called tea party Republicans that joined the far left wingers in opposing this spending bill - not surprised you missed it - you're good at missing the most obvious particularly when it goes against your preconceived opinions.

JMHO Loc: Utah

MarvinSussman wrote:

An honest, rational, intelligent person who disagr... (show quote)

I'm not foaming at the mouth, nor am I spitting...but, it sounds like you are. I just find it a total waste of my time to debate a libtard and Keynesian i***t like yourself. So, keep espousing your nonsense and left-wing bullcrap, maybe, just maybe, you'll find some other brain-dead i***t who will listen to you.

MarvinSussman

Dave wrote:

Perhaps you missed a simple reality - in both Houses it was the so called tea party Republicans that joined the far left wingers in opposing this spending bill - not surprised you missed it - you're good at missing the most obvious particularly when it goes against your preconceived opinions.

The v**e on spending was a foregone conclusion and was never the question.

The important thing is your voice in the market place of ideas. You are either for bailing out Wall Street or not. The White Trash Tea Party was mum on the most important question of the day: can Citigroup tell us that it wants to gamble with federal money and gets their way and nobody speaks up on the Republican side?

I***tS!

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

MarvinSussman wrote:

The v**e on spending was a foregone conclusion and was never the question.

The important thing is your voice in the market place of ideas. You are either for bailing out Wall Street or not. The White Trash Tea Party was mum on the most important question of the day: can Citigroup tell us that it wants to gamble with federal money and gets their way and nobody speaks up on the Republican side?

I***tS!

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

MarvinSussman wrote:

The v**e on spending was a foregone conclusion and was never the question.

The important thing is your voice in the market place of ideas. You are either for bailing out Wall Street or not. The White Trash Tea Party was mum on the most important question of the day: can Citigroup tell us that it wants to gamble with federal money and gets their way and nobody speaks up on the Republican side?

I***tS!

I know, a simple distinction that the gutless wonders on this site are afraid to deal with.
I commend any alliances between left and right that have the courage to speak out and take action against the WallSt/banker parasites that are l**ting the public treasury AND the private wealth of our citizens. This is ccommon ground, shared common interests to be sure.

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

MarvinSussman wrote:

The v**e on spending was a foregone conclusion and was never the question.

The important thing is your voice in the market place of ideas. You are either for bailing out Wall Street or not. The White Trash Tea Party was mum on the most important question of the day: can Citigroup tell us that it wants to gamble with federal money and gets their way and nobody speaks up on the Republican side?

I***tS!

I find it fascinating that you feel a need to not only throw race into the discussion, but your smug self satisfaction of your supposed elite status. Meanwhile, if bailing out Wall Street is your concern, you obviously in you smugness are not aware that Dodd-Frank does more to protect the "too big to fail" bunch well beyond reason or history. The most dangerous folks out there are those who are no where near as intelligent as they think they are - and you sure are dangerous.

MarvinSussman

Dave wrote:

I find it fascinating that you feel a need to not only throw race into the discussion, but your smug self satisfaction of your supposed elite status. Meanwhile, if bailing out Wall Street is your concern, you obviously in you smugness are not aware that Dodd-Frank does more to protect the "too big to fail" bunch well beyond reason or history. The most dangerous folks out there are those who are no where near as intelligent as they think they are - and you sure are dangerous.

I will join the Tea Party if you can explain what Dodd-Frank does to protect banks, excluding riders inserted by Citigroup and/or its brother banks with the help of conservatives in Congress.

Citigroup wrote the legislation that YOUR Congress passed. Doesn't that tell you anything?

I dub thee "Bailout Dave".