In All Fairness To Fathers And Child Support...It Does Go Down As Income Goes Down: Look at what H****r was making when he was on the Burisma board, of course his child support was...

woodguru

Look at what H****r was making when he was on the Burisma board, of course his child support was tens of thousands...But lose an income like that child support is going to go down too.

Child support being something those on the right face as well, it should be something those on the right can understand.

son of witless

woodguru wrote:

Look at what H****r was making when he was on the Burisma board, of course his child support was tens of thousands...But lose an income like that child support is going to go down too.

Child support being something those on the right face as well, it should be something those on the right can understand.

Please keep on defending the indefensible. The poor woman originally had to take H****r to court because he would not support his child. H****r may just have income that is unreported, which is relevant to that poor woman. I mean the man has a history of not reporting income to the IRS.

Liberty Tree

son of witless wrote:

Please keep on defending the indefensible. The poor woman originally had to take H****r to court because he would not support his child. H****r may just have income that is unreported, which is relevant to that poor woman. I mean the man has a history of not reporting income to the IRS.

Joe and Jill ignoring their grandchild is despicable.

woodguru

son of witless wrote:

Please keep on defending the indefensible. The poor woman originally had to take H****r to court because he would not support his child. H****r may just have income that is unreported, which is relevant to that poor woman. I mean the man has a history of not reporting income to the IRS.

Lots of people do, I ran the wrong side of that fence back in the 80's, self employed and I always was a bit short of paying taxes so I didn't file for a few years. It took a decade of payments and paying interest and penalties to get out from under a relatively small tax debt...

Never again is all I can say about that, Lol

woodguru

son of witless wrote:

Please keep on defending the indefensible. The poor woman originally had to take H****r to court because he would not support his child. H****r may just have income that is unreported, which is relevant to that poor woman. I mean the man has a history of not reporting income to the IRS.

Poor woman, they were not married, he didn't want a kid, if she did it's on her

atkinsonsm

woodguru wrote:

Look at what H****r was making when he was on the Burisma board, of course his child support was tens of thousands...But lose an income like that child support is going to go down too.

Child support being something those on the right face as well, it should be something those on the right can understand.

His income wont/hasn't gone down...they are just hiding it in different ways. H****r claimed he had to pay the "big guys" $50,000.00 a month expenses for housing, utilities, etc etc etc. Now "the big guy" is just letting H****r live there free. His expenses went down...plus his drug habit costs have been reduced (maybe)..plus he sells at least 3 a week..photocopies of his original "art" at $75k each... Dont think for a minute that what he told the court is true.

son of witless

woodguru wrote:

Lots of people do, I ran the wrong side of that fence back in the 80's, self employed and I always was a bit short of paying taxes so I didn't file for a few years. It took a decade of payments and paying interest and penalties to get out from under a relatively small tax debt...

Never again is all I can say about that, Lol

Okay. I do not judge you. You were not overseas selling influence for your father. You were not a crack addict. You did not father a child and have to be sued to support your child. You were not dating your brother's widow. You did not get booted from the military for drugs. You did not lie on a gov. form and buy a gun. You did not then lose said gun. You were not snorting coke off of the butts of hookers.

You are quite the dull boy next to the exciting life of danger Joe's boy has lead. I am not knocking you, I am even duller than you.

atkinsonsm

son of witless wrote:

Okay. I do not judge you. You were not overseas se... (show quote)

THANK GOD FOR DULLNESS THEN.

son of witless

woodguru wrote:

Poor woman, they were not married, he didn't want a kid, if she did it's on her

Who knows ? The fact is, he lead a risky life. That only one woman got knocked up accidentally is amazing. I know I'm old fashioned, but I believe you support and love your kids, no matter how they came into being. It's not like H****r is poor. I also blame Joe. No matter how embarrassing the circumstance, this is his Grand Daughter. It's not like Joe is poor either. Grand Children are precious. You can never have enough of them.

In fact, embracing this grand daughter would get Joe all kinds of kudos from everyone. Even those of us on the Right who cannot stand Joe would respect him for it. So it would piss off H****r. So what ?

son of witless

atkinsonsm wrote:

THANK GOD FOR DULLNESS THEN.

Yes, but the ladies go for the H****r B***ns. The dull boys are pushed to the sidelines by the bad boys. I've seen it so many times. Women always go for the creeps. One of my friends had a daughter. A pretty girl who had a lot of good guys wanting to take her out, but she always dated losers who beat her up.

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

Liberty Tree wrote:

Joe and Jill ignoring their grandchild is despicable.

Exactly right.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

son of witless wrote:

Please keep on defending the indefensible. The poor woman originally had to take H****r to court because he would not support his child. H****r may just have income that is unreported, which is relevant to that poor woman. I mean the man has a history of not reporting income to the IRS.

We have already affirmed he was a crack addict.
Start there next time.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

woodguru wrote:

Poor woman, they were not married, he didn't want a kid, if she did it's on her

Bullscat! Damn! You really are a true POS, aren't you?
If you father a child, you're responsible for that child. Period!!

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

archie bunker wrote:

Bullscat! Damn! You really are a true POS, aren't you?
If you father a child, you're responsible for that child. Period!!

The fact you have to explain that betrays the real problem.

“1But know this: that in the last days, grievous times will come. 2For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3without natural affection, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, fierce, not lovers of good, 4t*****rs, headstrong, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5holding a form of godliness but having denied its power. Turn away from these, also. 6For some of these are people who creep into houses and take captive gullible women loaded down with sins, led away by various lusts, 7always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the t***h.” 2 Timothy 3:1-7

Most people with anything like a good working moral compass are actually happy to love and care for their own flesh and blood!

son of witless

Milosia2 wrote:

We have already affirmed he was a crack addict.
Start there next time.

This woman is doing H****r a great service. The more money he pays to support his beautiful daughter, the less coke goes up his nose. His daughter is keeping him sober. She is probably saving his life.

How is that for a freakin start ?!