woodguru

We're going to be seeing a whole lot more about this...so please, allow me to point out in advance what we are looking at...verification will come later as the facts get covered in depth...and we'll see how accurate and right I've been, won't we?

Alito jumped on this trying to head off what he knew was coming, and his representation has been wrong, otherwise known as lies when you know what the facts and t***h is...
...he said he had no way of knowing this billionaire would have cases before the court...a lie
...he offered as a stupidly lame excuse that he was taking a $100k jet flight that would have been empty, too stupid to respond to legally

He had never met the guy, the fishing party was set up by the Leo of the Federalist Society...it was nothing more than another example of hooking billionaires with legal issues up with supreme court justices

This one stinks...the standard is not proving there was a quid pro quo, the standard is never allowing there to be the perception that there could be one in the first place.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Why dont you mind your own crooks who are inhabiting White House, especially crook's crooked son..🙄

woodguru

Problem is you have to walk and chew gum at the same time...how about you look at a situation and decide whether something is wrong or not?

Do you have it in you to look at what went on here and simply say this is what conflicts of interest means?

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

woodglue is the smartest man on earth, PR, he makes Einstein look like a r****d.
Woody's knowledge of the law, its interpretation and application is phenomenal.