woodguru wrote:
This is the stupidity we are dealing with that is because of the d******eness in this country...history has one side and one side only, the "other side" is the spin, and those that don't like the facts and the way things were would have us believe that it's the t***h and facts that are not the way they were.
And now a college is expected to represent the other side of what the facts are...that is sheer raw stupidity. Republican lawmakers call this intellectual diversity, when what it is is an exercise in misinformation. If the "other side" is represented, I don't suppose it can be called the spin or the way the other side sees it?
https://www.rawstory.com/what-is-senate-bill-83/?cx_testId=4&cx_testVariant=cx_undefined&cx_artPos=9&cx_experienceId=EXC93HV4HK4I#cxrecs_sThis is the stupidity we are dealing with that is ... (
show quote)
=======
Au contraire, Woody. You say "history has one side and one side only, the "other side" is the spin". Who is to say that the historians who write history don't spin their side of the story.
Take the issue of "s***ery". If you read much of the "woke" i.e main stream news, the issue of "white guilt/privilige" goes hand in hand with "r********ns initiatives" based on the misbegotten notion of state-sanctioned racial discrimination.
If you knew anything about the issue of "s***ery", you would know that s***ery was not a peculiar American institution.
As British historian Dan Jones notes in "Powers and Thrones: A New History of the Middle Ages",
"S***ery was a fact of life throughout the ancient world. S***es—people defined as property, forced to work, stripped of their rights, and socially ‘dead,’ could be found in every significant realm of the age. In China, the Qin, Han, and Xin dynasties enforced various forms of s***ery; so too did ancient rulers of Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia, and India."
The indigenous populations of both North and South America, pre-European settlement, also practiced s***ery.
In Milton Meltzer’s "S***ery: A World History", he writes "Perhaps because it conflicts with race-based political agendas,
s***ery of Africans by fellow Africans is one of those uncomfortable t***hs that often flies under the radar. Likewise, industrial-scale s***ery of Africans by nearby Arabs as well as Arab s***ery of Europeans are historical facts that are frequently ignored. Both subjects are explored in The Forgotten S***e Trade: The White European S***es of Islam by Simon Webb and S***ery and Slaving in African History by Sean Stilwell.
Republican lawmakers say the bill is being misrepresented and that its only intent is to promote intellectual diversity. MY COMMENT: Like the historical context of how s***ery existed in most all cultures, including the African nations!
"I think in an academic environment, all sides — good, the bad and the ugly — need to be talked about and discussed and debated," Bill sponsor Sen. Jerry Cirino (R-Kirtland) told News 5.
https://fee.org/articles/the-history-of-s***ery-you-probably-werent-taught-in-school/