How much proof do you need? How much proof do you need before you understand Biden is c*********d, t*****r or both?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

How much proof do you need before you understand Biden is c*********d, t*****r or both?

https://nypost.com/2023/06/17/biden-excuses-chinas-spy-balloon-flight/

Liberty Tree

JFlorio wrote:

How much proof do you need before you understand Biden is c*********d, t*****r or both?

https://nypost.com/2023/06/17/biden-excuses-chinas-spy-balloon-flight/

L*****ts will never admit it, no matter the facts.

Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

JFlorio wrote:

How much proof do you need before you understand Biden is c*********d, t*****r or both?

https://nypost.com/2023/06/17/biden-excuses-chinas-spy-balloon-flight/

I believe FJB had and agreement with XI to not shoot down the ballon until they got all the information they wanted.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

Liberty Tree wrote:

L*****ts will never admit it, no matter the facts.

Speculation but possibly. Maybe probable.

There are many on the left who do not think Biden is fit to be president. It was a v**e against a greater risk that got him elected. The lessor of two evils.

It is the right that would never admit that Trump could be c*********d and possibly stole docs for personal gain.

woodguru

JFlorio wrote:

How much proof do you need before you understand Biden Trump is c*********d, t*****r or both?

See how that works?

elledee

The hair sniffer is totally corrupt always has been

microphor Loc: Home is TN

RascalRiley wrote:

Speculation but possibly. Maybe probable.

There are many on the left who do not think Biden is fit to be president. It was a v**e against a greater risk that got him elected. The lessor of two evils.

It is the right that would never admit that Trump could be c*********d and possibly stole docs for personal gain.

ahahahahaha, "greater risk", yeah the guy who kept and took us out of a war was the greater threat! You people are dense as they come!

Liberty Tree

RascalRiley wrote:

Speculation but possibly. Maybe probable.

There are many on the left who do not think Biden is fit to be president. It was a v**e against a greater risk that got him elected. The lessor of two evils.

It is the right that would never admit that Trump could be c*********d and possibly stole docs for personal gain.

If you think Trump is a greater risk to national security than the one you v**ed for, you are either delusional or totally dishonest.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

woodguru wrote:

See how that works?

GFY !

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

Liberty Tree wrote:

If you think Trump is a greater risk to national security than the one you v**ed for, you are either delusional or totally dishonest.

He v**ed for Trudough.

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

woodguru wrote:

See how that works?

How much proof do you need before you understand woodguru is c*********d, t*****r or both?

woodguru

youngwilliam wrote:

How much proof do you need before you understand woodguru is c*********d, t*****r or both?

Easy now wee little willy

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

woodguru wrote:

Easy now wee little willy

What you gonna do, call the FBI on me. I know your good at empty threats.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

microphor wrote:

ahahahahaha, "greater risk", yeah the guy who kept and took us out of a war was the greater threat! You people are dense as they come!

The man who gave intelligence to the enemy is not a risk? You like to forget that.

Do you think Putin would stop at annexing Ukraine? We will never know.

Do insults boost your ego?

microphor Loc: Home is TN

RascalRiley wrote:

The man who gave intelligence to the enemy is not a risk? You like to forget that.

Do you think Putin would stop at annexing Ukraine? We will never know.

Do insults boost your ego?

What evidence do you have, show me and I want evidence not opinions.