One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Who believes a passenger plane did this?
Jun 19, 2023 12:27:54   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
Both political parties want you to believe a lightweight hollow thin skinned aluminum commercial airplane with a plastic nose cone sliced through reenforced concrete and steel beams like it was butter.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1670083166961270784

Reply
Jun 19, 2023 12:47:28   #
steve66613
 
Ri-chard wrote:
Both political parties want you to believe a lightweight hollow thin skinned aluminum commercial airplane with a plastic nose cone sliced through reenforced concrete and steel beams like it was butter.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1670083166961270784


Could it have something to do with the fact that a loaded commercial airliner weighs upwards of 450,000 pounds? And, was traveling approximately 450 mph?

Ain’t exactly a swarm of gnats.

Reply
Jun 19, 2023 13:00:30   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Ri-chard wrote:
Both political parties want you to believe a lightweight hollow thin skinned aluminum commercial airplane with a plastic nose cone sliced through reenforced concrete and steel beams like it was butter.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1670083166961270784
Have you ever seen a commercial jet up close and personal?
The one that hit the South Tower weighed 140 tons and was flying at 500mph.





Reply
Jun 19, 2023 13:31:38   #
Kevyn
 
Ri-chard wrote:
Both political parties want you to believe a lightweight hollow thin skinned aluminum commercial airplane with a plastic nose cone sliced through reenforced concrete and steel beams like it was butter.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1670083166961270784


Anyone with even a modem of understanding of metallurgy, engineering and fire science.

Reply
Jun 19, 2023 15:09:47   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
And filled with a full load of aviation fuel that was instantly dispersed through out the entirety of several floors.

Reply
Jun 20, 2023 12:10:03   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
steve66613 wrote:
Could it have something to do with the fact that a loaded commercial airliner weighs upwards of 450,000 pounds? And, was traveling approximately 450 mph?

Ain’t exactly a swarm of gnats.


Could it be a hollow aluminum with a plastic nose cone can actually destroy reenforced concrete and steel beams?

Many of us have also viewed passenger planes to see what happens when the hit water or the ground = equal reeses pieces every time. Also, the films of controlled crashes when hitting a concrete wall = a sudden stop with scatted debris.

Also, it was impossible for a commercial passenger plane to have fit in the small impact hole at the Pentagon and then pass through several of the bomb blast proof rings of the pentagon structure.

It is a fraud to conceal a fraud.
False in one thing, false in all things.
Fraud lies hidden in general expressions.

I was there that day working for General Dynamics as a physical security contractor.









Reply
Jun 24, 2023 19:15:48   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
If it wasn't a plane, then where did that fourth hijacked plane go? Just askin'

Reply
Jun 24, 2023 21:28:47   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Ri-chard wrote:
Could it be a hollow aluminum with a plastic nose cone can actually destroy reenforced concrete and steel beams?
Hell yes it can if it is going fast enough.
Unless you have a solid background in physics, particularly regarding Newton's Laws of Motion, you'll never understand impact forces in the collision of a moving object with a stationary one. You won't understand the dynamics of potential and kinetic energies.

Ri-chard wrote:
Many of us have also viewed passenger planes to see what happens when the hit water or the ground = equal reeses pieces every time. Also, the films of controlled crashes when hitting a concrete wall = a sudden stop with scatted debris.

I suggest you check out the 1987 crash of PSA flight 1771 in CA. and the 1996 crash of Valuejet flight 592 into the Florida Everglades. These will give you an idea of what happens to a commercial jet and the people aboard when it crashes at very high speeds.

Ri-chard wrote:
Also, it was impossible for a commercial passenger plane to have fit in the small impact hole at the Pentagon and then pass through several of the bomb blast proof rings of the pentagon structure.
No, it wasn't impossible. They recovered the black boxes. The FDR data, along with radar tracking by two ATC centers, Washington-Dulles Approach Control and the USAF 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron, showed conclusively that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon.

In addition, A&E t***hers' very own David Chandler produced a video titled The Pentagon Plane Puzzle: Going beyond speculation in which he gave a rather boring, but detailed account of Flight 77, an American Airlines Boeing 757, crashing into the Pentagon. He simply could not ignore the accounts of over 110 eyewitnesses, some of whom were military personnel, some were pilots.

Reply
Jun 26, 2023 14:25:35   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
If it wasn't a plane, then where did that fourth hijacked plane go? Just askin'


Once again it was not a plane. Only the missel rotor was found at min. The FBI Pics proved it..
Now go back to sleep. That plane you want to talk about is what carries the missel as it flew over the Pentagon.

What happened to all the commercial passenger plane debris in PA. No bodies, seats luggage, tail section +++++? Unlike you many of us have seen what's left over after a nose-diving commercial plane has that sudden stop...

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.