Both political parties want you to believe a lightweight hollow thin skinned aluminum commercial airplane with a plastic nose cone sliced through reenforced concrete and steel beams like it was butter.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1670083166961270784
Ri-chard wrote:
Both political parties want you to believe a lightweight hollow thin skinned aluminum commercial airplane with a plastic nose cone sliced through reenforced concrete and steel beams like it was butter.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1670083166961270784Could it have something to do with the fact that a loaded commercial airliner weighs upwards of 450,000 pounds? And, was traveling approximately 450 mph?
Ain’t exactly a swarm of gnats.
Ri-chard wrote:
Both political parties want you to believe a lightweight hollow thin skinned aluminum commercial airplane with a plastic nose cone sliced through reenforced concrete and steel beams like it was butter.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1670083166961270784Have you ever seen a commercial jet up close and personal?
The one that hit the South Tower weighed 140 tons and was flying at 500mph.
Ri-chard wrote:
Both political parties want you to believe a lightweight hollow thin skinned aluminum commercial airplane with a plastic nose cone sliced through reenforced concrete and steel beams like it was butter.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1670083166961270784Anyone with even a modem of understanding of metallurgy, engineering and fire science.
And filled with a full load of aviation fuel that was instantly dispersed through out the entirety of several floors.
steve66613 wrote:
Could it have something to do with the fact that a loaded commercial airliner weighs upwards of 450,000 pounds? And, was traveling approximately 450 mph?
Ain’t exactly a swarm of gnats.
Could it be a hollow aluminum with a plastic nose cone can actually destroy reenforced concrete and steel beams?
Many of us have also viewed passenger planes to see what happens when the hit water or the ground = equal reeses pieces every time. Also, the films of controlled crashes when hitting a concrete wall = a sudden stop with scatted debris.
Also, it was impossible for a commercial passenger plane to have fit in the small impact hole at the Pentagon and then pass through several of the bomb blast proof rings of the pentagon structure.
It is a fraud to conceal a fraud.
False in one thing, false in all things.
Fraud lies hidden in general expressions.
I was there that day working for General Dynamics as a physical security contractor.
If it wasn't a plane, then where did that fourth hijacked plane go? Just askin'
Ri-chard wrote:
Could it be a hollow aluminum with a plastic nose cone can actually destroy reenforced concrete and steel beams?
Hell yes it can if it is going fast enough.
Unless you have a solid background in physics, particularly regarding Newton's Laws of Motion, you'll never understand impact forces in the collision of a moving object with a stationary one. You won't understand the dynamics of potential and kinetic energies.
Ri-chard wrote:
Many of us have also viewed passenger planes to see what happens when the hit water or the ground = equal reeses pieces every time. Also, the films of controlled crashes when hitting a concrete wall = a sudden stop with scatted debris.
I suggest you check out the 1987 crash of PSA flight 1771 in CA. and the 1996 crash of Valuejet flight 592 into the Florida Everglades. These will give you an idea of what happens to a commercial jet and the people aboard when it crashes at very high speeds.
Ri-chard wrote:
Also, it was impossible for a commercial passenger plane to have fit in the small impact hole at the Pentagon and then pass through several of the bomb blast proof rings of the pentagon structure.
No, it wasn't impossible. They recovered the black boxes. The FDR data, along with radar tracking by two ATC centers, Washington-Dulles Approach Control and the USAF 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron, showed conclusively that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon.
In addition, A&E t***hers' very own David Chandler produced a video titled
The Pentagon Plane Puzzle: Going beyond speculation in which he gave a rather boring, but detailed account of Flight 77, an American Airlines Boeing 757, crashing into the Pentagon. He simply could not ignore the accounts of over 110 eyewitnesses, some of whom were military personnel, some were pilots.
LogicallyRight wrote:
If it wasn't a plane, then where did that fourth hijacked plane go? Just askin'
Once again it was not a plane. Only the missel rotor was found at min. The FBI Pics proved it..
Now go back to sleep. That plane you want to talk about is what carries the missel as it flew over the Pentagon.
What happened to all the commercial passenger plane debris in PA. No bodies, seats luggage, tail section +++++? Unlike you many of us have seen what's left over after a nose-diving commercial plane has that sudden stop...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.