When a key piece of intelligence gets "loose" such as being taken from a secure chain of custody, meaning the guy that stands there letting trump read something, and then waits to take it back only to have the chief leaker refuse to give it back, saying I'm going to take it to read again...it has to be reported as potentially compromising any associated spies or informants, because if the information gets to anyone the assets where it came from will die.
To give Putin any seemingly innocuous information might have only one place it could have come from, and Putin would be looking for a mole anyway.
Trump let Russian ambassador have some information he thought was no big deal, except that it came from Israeli intelligence and it blew their spy network. They were pissed and it had been reported from inside sources that foreign intelligence was no longer going to share their most sensitive information because our president was a threat to their security.
Another leak that got publicity was when trump posted the picture of the missile that had blown up on the launchpad in strikingly clear resolution images. it was for trump only, but he wanted to post it on social media to show how good his/our intelligence satellites were.
Insiders testified as to the exchange that took place, trump was told respectfully, sir, you cannot post that image, the resolution is far better than we want our oppositions to know we have, it represents five billion dollars worth of upgrades we don't want adversaries to know we have.
Did that mean anything to trump? No of course not, he said he was posting it, they asked him to let them provide a downsized resolution, but no, he had to go with what he wanted to because he could.
He has no regards for security or intelligence concerns.
steve66613 wrote:
References?
Look it up, it was well covered on multiple sources, if you looked it up several would come up.
Trump was a leak machine
steve66613 wrote:
References?
It's his unusual h**e for Trump..🙄
woodguru wrote:
Another leak that got publicity was when trump posted the picture of the missile that had blown up on the launchpad in strikingly clear resolution images. it was for trump only, but he wanted to post it on social media to show how good his/our intelligence satellites were.
Insiders testified as to the exchange that took place, trump was told respectfully, sir, you cannot post that image, the resolution is far better than we want our oppositions to know we have, it represents five billion dollars worth of upgrades we don't want adversaries to know we have.
Did that mean anything to trump? No of course not, he said he was posting it, they asked him to let them provide a downsized resolution, but no, he had to go with what he wanted to because he could.
He has no regards for security or intelligence concerns.
Another leak that got publicity was when trump pos... (
show quote)
So what are you saying he was allowed to declassify it even though they told him not to
woodguru wrote:
When a key piece of intelligence gets "loose" such as being taken from a secure chain of custody, meaning the guy that stands there letting trump read something, and then waits to take it back only to have the chief leaker refuse to give it back, saying I'm going to take it to read again...it has to be reported as potentially compromising any associated spies or informants, because if the information gets to anyone the assets where it came from will die.
To give Putin any seemingly innocuous information might have only one place it could have come from, and Putin would be looking for a mole anyway.
Trump let Russian ambassador have some information he thought was no big deal, except that it came from Israeli intelligence and it blew their spy network. They were pissed and it had been reported from inside sources that foreign intelligence was no longer going to share their most sensitive information because our president was a threat to their security.
When a key piece of intelligence gets "loose&... (
show quote)
It’s almost like a president can declassify anything he wants to
woodguru wrote:
Look it up, it was well covered on multiple sources, if you looked it up several would come up.
Trump was a leak machine
Look it up......humph!
I've got something you can look up.
Liar.
archie bunker wrote:
Look it up......humph!
I've got something you can look up.
Liar.
Oh….Wood wasn’t lying….he just failed to mention what he was referring to, HAPPENED IN 2017!
And, Ol’bama and Hitlery had similar incidents.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.