Security clearances, top level ten year background checks with interviews of virtually everyone the person has known for ten years. They cost hundreds of thousands in resources...
...and yes, 100% totally irrelevant. No defense attorney has any need to be able to go over the documents, the title that was used to identify documents charged will suffice, especially documents so sensitive that they are compartmentalized to need to know eyes only type information. They couldn't use the documents they've seen in a defense, so there is a total irrelevance. The charge that he mishandled doesn't matter whether they were confidential or eyes only.
https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-security-clearance/?utm_source=push_notifications
woodguru wrote:
Security clearances, top level ten year background checks with interviews of virtually everyone the person has known for ten years. They cost hundreds of thousands in resources...
...and yes, 100% totally irrelevant. No defense attorney has any need to be able to go over the documents, the title that was used to identify documents charged will suffice, especially documents so sensitive that they are compartmentalized to need to know eyes only type information. They couldn't use the documents they've seen in a defense, so there is a total irrelevance. The charge that he mishandled doesn't matter whether they were confidential or eyes only.
https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-security-clearance/?utm_source=push_notificationsSecurity clearances, top level ten year background... (
show quote)
A classic Trump tactic. Delay delay delay and run up the costs.
woodguru wrote:
Security clearances, top level ten year background checks with interviews of virtually everyone the person has known for ten years. They cost hundreds of thousands in resources...
...and yes, 100% totally irrelevant. No defense attorney has any need to be able to go over the documents, the title that was used to identify documents charged will suffice, especially documents so sensitive that they are compartmentalized to need to know eyes only type information. They couldn't use the documents they've seen in a defense, so there is a total irrelevance. The charge that he mishandled doesn't matter whether they were confidential or eyes only.
https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-security-clearance/?utm_source=push_notificationsSecurity clearances, top level ten year background... (
show quote)
Eyes only I think you made that up
woodguru wrote:
Security clearances, top level ten year background checks with interviews of virtually everyone the person has known for ten years. They cost hundreds of thousands in resources...
...and yes, 100% totally irrelevant. No defense attorney has any need to be able to go over the documents, the title that was used to identify documents charged will suffice, especially documents so sensitive that they are compartmentalized to need to know eyes only type information. They couldn't use the documents they've seen in a defense, so there is a total irrelevance. The charge that he mishandled doesn't matter whether they were confidential or eyes only.
https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-security-clearance/?utm_source=push_notificationsSecurity clearances, top level ten year background... (
show quote)
I'm sure glad we have you here to tell us what the law is. NOT
NWR.
Not sure they have a need to know for actually examining every document, especially the highly classified, but they should be able to have the right to document every document taken, and read the cover sheet to verify what was taken. They should also be able to view every bit of video of what t***spired during the raid and what happened with the documents after the raid.
And since no one is above the law, they should also have the right to find out under sworn testimony, why clinton, biden and Pence were not charged for crimes far more serious then Trump's alleged crimes.
BIRDMAN wrote:
Eyes only I think you made that up
They are going to complain about everything the judge that does not suit their purpose. Of course a biased prosecutor can do what ever he pleases.
BIRDMAN wrote:
Eyes only I think you made that up
Is that what you think?
If it is then I know you are wrong
Liberty Tree wrote:
They are going to complain about everything the judge that does not suit their purpose. Of course a biased prosecutor can do what ever he pleases.
No, all that is wanted is a trial that goes along as fast as it can versus continuous unnecessary deolays meant to eat up the clock and get into e******n time, whereupon a new set of defense tactics will be used because of interference in the e******n.
If trump doesn't want this to interfere with his e******n, then he needs to be instructing the court to go as fast as is possible, rocket docket tactics the Florida court is known for.
Apparently Cannon is the only judge on the court that doesn't know how to speed a case through versus slow walking it.
woodguru wrote:
Security clearances, top level ten year background checks with interviews of virtually everyone the person has known for ten years. They cost hundreds of thousands in resources...
...and yes, 100% totally irrelevant. No defense attorney has any need to be able to go over the documents, the title that was used to identify documents charged will suffice, especially documents so sensitive that they are compartmentalized to need to know eyes only type information. They couldn't use the documents they've seen in a defense, so there is a total irrelevance. The charge that he mishandled doesn't matter whether they were confidential or eyes only.
https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-security-clearance/?utm_source=push_notificationsSecurity clearances, top level ten year background... (
show quote)
Tell you what, Woodrow.
I'll call my buddy Donny, and see if I can talk him out of running for President again, and this will all go away. That's what you want isn't it? Him to never be President again?
RascalRiley wrote:
A classic Trump tactic. Delay delay delay and run up the costs.
Trump didn't do this. A judge did.
woodguru wrote:
Is that what you think?
If it is then I know you are wrong
But I know you will never prove that you’re right
LogicallyRight wrote:
I'm sure glad we have you here to tell us what the law is. NOT
And since no one is above the law, they should also have the right to find out under sworn testimony, why clinton, biden and Pence were not charged for crimes far more serious then Trump's alleged crimes.
That is certainly one of the things that this case is not
Can you imagine the mess the court system was if every unrelated case was allowed?
If you were actually paying attention to those related cases, you would have caught on to the fact that when the violations were compared equally to other same violations, they were misdemeanors (Hillary), and charged accordingly. Pence and Biden fully complied with turning the documents over, and had trump done that he would not be here facing the obstruction charges.
Had trump turned over everything, all boxes, and got charged anyway, he would have the they did it too leg to stand on, he was too stupid to go there...and now his supporters seem to be every bit as wrong as he was.
woodguru wrote:
That is certainly one of the things that this case is not
Can you imagine the mess the court system was if every unrelated case was allowed?
If you were actually paying attention to those related cases, you would have caught on to the fact that when the violations were compared equally to other same violations, they were misdemeanors (Hillary), and charged accordingly. Pence and Biden fully complied with turning the documents over, and had trump done that he would not be here facing the obstruction charges.
Had trump turned over everything, all boxes, and got charged anyway, he would have the they did it too leg to stand on, he was too stupid to go there...and now his supporters seem to be every bit as wrong as he was.
That is certainly one of the things that this case... (
show quote)
You’re so full of Doodoo if Trump would’ve handed over every piece of paper they wouldn’t charged him with something else
archie bunker wrote:
Tell you what, Woodrow.
I'll call my buddy Donny, and see if I can talk him out of running for President again, and this will all go away. That's what you want isn't it? Him to never be President again?
We want l him in jail for being a t*****r .criminal , Putin sympathizer,
Selling our documents to Saudi Arabia .
Ignoring the K*****g Of Adnan Kashoggi by
MBS.
He should not be allowed anywhere near any government buildings .
Let alone a Whitehouse.
Anyone who thinks this would be perfectly fine, needs to have their head examined .
Go ahead and call your buddy , Donny , and ask him what color he would like his prison cell painted?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.