If you saw the evidence, you would have indicted Trump, too.
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have indicted Trump, too.
Opinion by EJ Montini, Arizona Republic
He also shared the information to people without security clearances.
Donald Trump calls indictment a 'political hit job', after landing in legal trouble again.
No one wants to believe bad things about a personal hero.
I’ve heard from a number of Arizona residents over the past couple of days who see former President Donald Trump as an icon, as their savior, and believe the only explanation for the more than 30 felony counts he faces related to his handling of classified documents is an evil conspiracy by “radial l*****ts,” or “the out-of-control Biden administration,” or “George Soros,” or “the media” (including me).
To which I say one thing: Read the indictment.
Just read it.
It is not particularly long. There is not a preponderance of legalese in it. It features excerpts of interviews and recordings, brief transcripts of online exchanges, photographs and more.
In other words, prosecutors brought receipts.
If you read the Trump indictment, you'll agree.
The grand jury, in turn, listened to witnesses, considered the evidence and v**ed in secret to charge Trump (and an aide) with some very serious crimes.
It does not mean he’s guilty.
It just means the evidence could not be ignored and the case should be prosecuted.
If you read the indictment – actually read it – you’ll agree.
Prosecutors point out how Trump stored classified documents in boxes at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, in unsecured places that included a ballroom, office, storage area and even a bathroom.
Trump's classified documents included info on weapons, strategy.
There is audio of Trump sharing classified information with, as the indictment reads, “a writer, a publisher, and two members of his staff, none of whom possessed a security clearance.”
There are reports that Trump told individuals, including his attorney, to “falsely represent” to the FBI that he didn’t have documents, and that he wanted his people to hide them.
And what type of documents are we talking about?
The indictment says they included “information regarding defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries; United States nuclear programs; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.”
Former Attorney General Bill Barr: 'If even half of it is true, then he's toast'
Nuclear programs? Potential vulnerabilities? Plans for retaliation?
Trump’s former Attorney General William Barr condemned his old boss. He said in part, “The government acted responsibly. And it was Donald J. Trump who acted irresponsibly,” adding, “(They’re) solid counts. ... If even half of it is true, then he's toast.”
Barr said the attempts to label the indictment of Trump a witch hunt are “ridiculous.”
The things Trump was indicted for doing land people in prison.
Questioning Trump's charges mean you're willfully ignorant. This month, a retired U.S. Air Force intelligence officer got three years in federal prison for keeping classified documents at his home and other places.
Will Biden pardon Trump? If Donald Trump is convicted, President Biden should pardon him. Really.
If the name on the indictment was anything but Trump, there would be no question – none – that the charges are justified.
Read it. You’ll see.
The former president, like every defendant, must be presumed innocent.
If convicted, he is, as Barr said, toast. Until then, he is not officially guilty of a thing.
But those who choose to willfully ignore the facts of Trump’s case … are.
slatten49 wrote:
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have indicted Trump, too.
Opinion by EJ Montini, Arizona Republic
He also shared the information to people without security clearances.
Donald Trump calls indictment a 'political hit job', after landing in legal trouble again.
No one wants to believe bad things about a personal hero.
I’ve heard from a number of Arizona residents over the past couple of days who see former President Donald Trump as an icon, as their savior, and believe the only explanation for the more than 30 felony counts he faces related to his handling of classified documents is an evil conspiracy by “radial l*****ts,” or “the out-of-control Biden administration,” or “George Soros,” or “the media” (including me).
To which I say one thing: Read the indictment.
Just read it.
It is not particularly long. There is not a preponderance of legalese in it. It features excerpts of interviews and recordings, brief transcripts of online exchanges, photographs and more.
In other words, prosecutors brought receipts.
If you read the Trump indictment, you'll agree.
The grand jury, in turn, listened to witnesses, considered the evidence and v**ed in secret to charge Trump (and an aide) with some very serious crimes.
It does not mean he’s guilty.
It just means the evidence could not be ignored and the case should be prosecuted.
If you read the indictment – actually read it – you’ll agree.
Prosecutors point out how Trump stored classified documents in boxes at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, in unsecured places that included a ballroom, office, storage area and even a bathroom.
Trump's classified documents included info on weapons, strategy.
There is audio of Trump sharing classified information with, as the indictment reads, “a writer, a publisher, and two members of his staff, none of whom possessed a security clearance.”
There are reports that Trump told individuals, including his attorney, to “falsely represent” to the FBI that he didn’t have documents, and that he wanted his people to hide them.
And what type of documents are we talking about?
The indictment says they included “information regarding defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries; United States nuclear programs; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.”
Former Attorney General Bill Barr: 'If even half of it is true, then he's toast'
Nuclear programs? Potential vulnerabilities? Plans for retaliation?
Trump’s former Attorney General William Barr condemned his old boss. He said in part, “The government acted responsibly. And it was Donald J. Trump who acted irresponsibly,” adding, “(They’re) solid counts. ... If even half of it is true, then he's toast.”
Barr said the attempts to label the indictment of Trump a witch hunt are “ridiculous.”
The things Trump was indicted for doing land people in prison.
Questioning Trump's charges mean you're willfully ignorant. This month, a retired U.S. Air Force intelligence officer got three years in federal prison for keeping classified documents at his home and other places.
Will Biden pardon Trump? If Donald Trump is convicted, President Biden should pardon him. Really.
If the name on the indictment was anything but Trump, there would be no question – none – that the charges are justified.
Read it. You’ll see.
The former president, like every defendant, must be presumed innocent.
If convicted, he is, as Barr said, toast. Until then, he is not officially guilty of a thing.
But those who choose to willfully ignore the facts of Trump’s case … are.
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have... (
show quote)
And he took a $10 million bribe from Ukraine
slatten49 wrote:
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have indicted Trump, too.
Opinion by EJ Montini, Arizona Republic
He also shared the information to people without security clearances.
Donald Trump calls indictment a 'political hit job', after landing in legal trouble again.
No one wants to believe bad things about a personal hero.
I’ve heard from a number of Arizona residents over the past couple of days who see former President Donald Trump as an icon, as their savior, and believe the only explanation for the more than 30 felony counts he faces related to his handling of classified documents is an evil conspiracy by “radial l*****ts,” or “the out-of-control Biden administration,” or “George Soros,” or “the media” (including me).
To which I say one thing: Read the indictment.
Just read it.
It is not particularly long. There is not a preponderance of legalese in it. It features excerpts of interviews and recordings, brief transcripts of online exchanges, photographs and more.
In other words, prosecutors brought receipts.
If you read the Trump indictment, you'll agree.
The grand jury, in turn, listened to witnesses, considered the evidence and v**ed in secret to charge Trump (and an aide) with some very serious crimes.
It does not mean he’s guilty.
It just means the evidence could not be ignored and the case should be prosecuted.
If you read the indictment – actually read it – you’ll agree.
Prosecutors point out how Trump stored classified documents in boxes at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, in unsecured places that included a ballroom, office, storage area and even a bathroom.
Trump's classified documents included info on weapons, strategy.
There is audio of Trump sharing classified information with, as the indictment reads, “a writer, a publisher, and two members of his staff, none of whom possessed a security clearance.”
There are reports that Trump told individuals, including his attorney, to “falsely represent” to the FBI that he didn’t have documents, and that he wanted his people to hide them.
And what type of documents are we talking about?
The indictment says they included “information regarding defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries; United States nuclear programs; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.”
Former Attorney General Bill Barr: 'If even half of it is true, then he's toast'
Nuclear programs? Potential vulnerabilities? Plans for retaliation?
Trump’s former Attorney General William Barr condemned his old boss. He said in part, “The government acted responsibly. And it was Donald J. Trump who acted irresponsibly,” adding, “(They’re) solid counts. ... If even half of it is true, then he's toast.”
Barr said the attempts to label the indictment of Trump a witch hunt are “ridiculous.”
The things Trump was indicted for doing land people in prison.
Questioning Trump's charges mean you're willfully ignorant. This month, a retired U.S. Air Force intelligence officer got three years in federal prison for keeping classified documents at his home and other places.
Will Biden pardon Trump? If Donald Trump is convicted, President Biden should pardon him. Really.
If the name on the indictment was anything but Trump, there would be no question – none – that the charges are justified.
Read it. You’ll see.
The former president, like every defendant, must be presumed innocent.
If convicted, he is, as Barr said, toast. Until then, he is not officially guilty of a thing.
But those who choose to willfully ignore the facts of Trump’s case … are.
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have... (
show quote)
The FBI is an openly politically corrupt organization, and every bit as crooked as Bribem,
only a blind fool would grant them the least degree of credibility.
No one outside of FBI/DOJ has ever seen those allegedly classified documents,
we have only the word of Bribem's personal Gestapo, which is totally worthless.
BIRDMAN wrote:
And he took a $10 million bribe from Ukraine
Did you actually reading read it????🙄
slatten49 wrote:
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have indicted Trump, too.
Opinion by EJ Montini, Arizona Republic
He also shared the information to people without security clearances.
Donald Trump calls indictment a 'political hit job', after landing in legal trouble again.
No one wants to believe bad things about a personal hero.
I’ve heard from a number of Arizona residents over the past couple of days who see former President Donald Trump as an icon, as their savior, and believe the only explanation for the more than 30 felony counts he faces related to his handling of classified documents is an evil conspiracy by “radial l*****ts,” or “the out-of-control Biden administration,” or “George Soros,” or “the media” (including me).
To which I say one thing: Read the indictment.
Just read it.
It is not particularly long. There is not a preponderance of legalese in it. It features excerpts of interviews and recordings, brief transcripts of online exchanges, photographs and more.
In other words, prosecutors brought receipts.
If you read the Trump indictment, you'll agree.
The grand jury, in turn, listened to witnesses, considered the evidence and v**ed in secret to charge Trump (and an aide) with some very serious crimes.
It does not mean he’s guilty.
It just means the evidence could not be ignored and the case should be prosecuted.
If you read the indictment – actually read it – you’ll agree.
Prosecutors point out how Trump stored classified documents in boxes at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, in unsecured places that included a ballroom, office, storage area and even a bathroom.
Trump's classified documents included info on weapons, strategy.
There is audio of Trump sharing classified information with, as the indictment reads, “a writer, a publisher, and two members of his staff, none of whom possessed a security clearance.”
There are reports that Trump told individuals, including his attorney, to “falsely represent” to the FBI that he didn’t have documents, and that he wanted his people to hide them.
And what type of documents are we talking about?
The indictment says they included “information regarding defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries; United States nuclear programs; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.”
Former Attorney General Bill Barr: 'If even half of it is true, then he's toast'
Nuclear programs? Potential vulnerabilities? Plans for retaliation?
Trump’s former Attorney General William Barr condemned his old boss. He said in part, “The government acted responsibly. And it was Donald J. Trump who acted irresponsibly,” adding, “(They’re) solid counts. ... If even half of it is true, then he's toast.”
Barr said the attempts to label the indictment of Trump a witch hunt are “ridiculous.”
The things Trump was indicted for doing land people in prison.
Questioning Trump's charges mean you're willfully ignorant. This month, a retired U.S. Air Force intelligence officer got three years in federal prison for keeping classified documents at his home and other places.
Will Biden pardon Trump? If Donald Trump is convicted, President Biden should pardon him. Really.
If the name on the indictment was anything but Trump, there would be no question – none – that the charges are justified.
Read it. You’ll see.
The former president, like every defendant, must be presumed innocent.
If convicted, he is, as Barr said, toast. Until then, he is not officially guilty of a thing.
But those who choose to willfully ignore the facts of Trump’s case … are.
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have... (
show quote)
It is to my understanding that the Suprem Court has ruled in a case involving Bill Clinton to turn over tapes and/or documents, that the president.had the sole right to to what he saw was correct. SOLE RIGHT. I am not worried that Trump did anything that would hurt our country just by having stored documents of any kind. The president has the highest security clearance of anyone in the country, so how can it be justified for the FBI or the DOJ to have these documents? Do any of those people in those agencies gave a higher security clearance than Trump? I don't think so.
If there is very solid proof that Trump actually did anything to harm our country then send him to jail. But I just don't see any solid evidence or proof of that having been done. It sounds like a lot of opinions and hearsay, just like most all the other accusations. I may be wrong but it seems as though the prosecutors have a heavy lift to under go to convict Trump.
Similar actions have been taken from most all president's and not one has been indicted. What does that say? Well the prosecutors had to work way overtime to come up with this charge to indict Trump.
slatten49 wrote:
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have indicted Trump, too.
Opinion by EJ Montini, Arizona Republic
He also shared the information to people without security clearances.
Donald Trump calls indictment a 'political hit job', after landing in legal trouble again.
No one wants to believe bad things about a personal hero.
I’ve heard from a number of Arizona residents over the past couple of days who see former President Donald Trump as an icon, as their savior, and believe the only explanation for the more than 30 felony counts he faces related to his handling of classified documents is an evil conspiracy by “radial l*****ts,” or “the out-of-control Biden administration,” or “George Soros,” or “the media” (including me).
To which I say one thing: Read the indictment.
Just read it.
It is not particularly long. There is not a preponderance of legalese in it. It features excerpts of interviews and recordings, brief transcripts of online exchanges, photographs and more.
In other words, prosecutors brought receipts.
If you read the Trump indictment, you'll agree.
The grand jury, in turn, listened to witnesses, considered the evidence and v**ed in secret to charge Trump (and an aide) with some very serious crimes.
It does not mean he’s guilty.
It just means the evidence could not be ignored and the case should be prosecuted.
If you read the indictment – actually read it – you’ll agree.
Prosecutors point out how Trump stored classified documents in boxes at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, in unsecured places that included a ballroom, office, storage area and even a bathroom.
Trump's classified documents included info on weapons, strategy.
There is audio of Trump sharing classified information with, as the indictment reads, “a writer, a publisher, and two members of his staff, none of whom possessed a security clearance.”
There are reports that Trump told individuals, including his attorney, to “falsely represent” to the FBI that he didn’t have documents, and that he wanted his people to hide them.
And what type of documents are we talking about?
The indictment says they included “information regarding defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries; United States nuclear programs; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.”
Former Attorney General Bill Barr: 'If even half of it is true, then he's toast'
Nuclear programs? Potential vulnerabilities? Plans for retaliation?
Trump’s former Attorney General William Barr condemned his old boss. He said in part, “The government acted responsibly. And it was Donald J. Trump who acted irresponsibly,” adding, “(They’re) solid counts. ... If even half of it is true, then he's toast.”
Barr said the attempts to label the indictment of Trump a witch hunt are “ridiculous.”
The things Trump was indicted for doing land people in prison.
Questioning Trump's charges mean you're willfully ignorant. This month, a retired U.S. Air Force intelligence officer got three years in federal prison for keeping classified documents at his home and other places.
Will Biden pardon Trump? If Donald Trump is convicted, President Biden should pardon him. Really.
If the name on the indictment was anything but Trump, there would be no question – none – that the charges are justified.
Read it. You’ll see.
The former president, like every defendant, must be presumed innocent.
If convicted, he is, as Barr said, toast. Until then, he is not officially guilty of a thing.
But those who choose to willfully ignore the facts of Trump’s case … are.
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have... (
show quote)
Be honest. Those who choose to willfully ignore the facts of FJB’S case……
And that is the crux of the matter that ELWNJs avoid - the oh so obvious double standard.
And that bothers a majority of Americans.
American Vet wrote:
Be honest. Those who choose to willfully ignore the facts of FJB’S case……
And that is the crux of the matter that ELWNJs avoid - the oh so obvious double standard.
And that bothers a majority of Americans.
Joe is currently immune to prosecution. His turn will come if he outlives his time as President
RascalRiley wrote:
Joe is currently immune to prosecution. His turn will come if he outlives his time as President
There is a massive failure to properly investigate......which has nothing to do with proseecution.
slatten49 wrote:
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have indicted Trump, too.
Opinion by EJ Montini, Arizona Republic
He also shared the information to people without security clearances.
Donald Trump calls indictment a 'political hit job', after landing in legal trouble again.
No one wants to believe bad things about a personal hero.
I’ve heard from a number of Arizona residents over the past couple of days who see former President Donald Trump as an icon, as their savior, and believe the only explanation for the more than 30 felony counts he faces related to his handling of classified documents is an evil conspiracy by “radial l*****ts,” or “the out-of-control Biden administration,” or “George Soros,” or “the media” (including me).
To which I say one thing: Read the indictment.
Just read it.
It is not particularly long. There is not a preponderance of legalese in it. It features excerpts of interviews and recordings, brief transcripts of online exchanges, photographs and more.
In other words, prosecutors brought receipts.
If you read the Trump indictment, you'll agree.
The grand jury, in turn, listened to witnesses, considered the evidence and v**ed in secret to charge Trump (and an aide) with some very serious crimes.
It does not mean he’s guilty.
It just means the evidence could not be ignored and the case should be prosecuted.
If you read the indictment – actually read it – you’ll agree.
Prosecutors point out how Trump stored classified documents in boxes at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, in unsecured places that included a ballroom, office, storage area and even a bathroom.
Trump's classified documents included info on weapons, strategy.
There is audio of Trump sharing classified information with, as the indictment reads, “a writer, a publisher, and two members of his staff, none of whom possessed a security clearance.”
There are reports that Trump told individuals, including his attorney, to “falsely represent” to the FBI that he didn’t have documents, and that he wanted his people to hide them.
And what type of documents are we talking about?
The indictment says they included “information regarding defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries; United States nuclear programs; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.”
Former Attorney General Bill Barr: 'If even half of it is true, then he's toast'
Nuclear programs? Potential vulnerabilities? Plans for retaliation?
Trump’s former Attorney General William Barr condemned his old boss. He said in part, “The government acted responsibly. And it was Donald J. Trump who acted irresponsibly,” adding, “(They’re) solid counts. ... If even half of it is true, then he's toast.”
Barr said the attempts to label the indictment of Trump a witch hunt are “ridiculous.”
The things Trump was indicted for doing land people in prison.
Questioning Trump's charges mean you're willfully ignorant. This month, a retired U.S. Air Force intelligence officer got three years in federal prison for keeping classified documents at his home and other places.
Will Biden pardon Trump? If Donald Trump is convicted, President Biden should pardon him. Really.
If the name on the indictment was anything but Trump, there would be no question – none – that the charges are justified.
Read it. You’ll see.
The former president, like every defendant, must be presumed innocent.
If convicted, he is, as Barr said, toast. Until then, he is not officially guilty of a thing.
But those who choose to willfully ignore the facts of Trump’s case … are.
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have... (
show quote)
Indictments aren’t proof!
I seriously doubt you saw any proof of any indictment.
You’re a sorry excuse for an American, your head is so far up your ass , I doubt you have ever seen the light of day!!!
Gatsby wrote:
The FBI is an openly politically corrupt organization, and every bit as crooked as Bribem,
only a blind fool would grant them the least degree of credibility.
No one outside of FBI/DOJ has ever seen those allegedly classified documents,
we have only the word of Bribem's personal Gestapo, which is totally worthless.
How this is even gotten this far is total BS!
The FBI never provided a list of what they took from Mar A Lago as stated by Trumps attorney that wasn’t even allowed to read the warrant.
The FBI simply showed it to her and kept her away from the whole raid.
How this is legal is beyond me.
slatten49 wrote:
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have indicted Trump, too.
Opinion by EJ Montini, Arizona Republic
He also shared the information to people without security clearances.
Donald Trump calls indictment a 'political hit job', after landing in legal trouble again.
No one wants to believe bad things about a personal hero.
I’ve heard from a number of Arizona residents over the past couple of days who see former President Donald Trump as an icon, as their savior, and believe the only explanation for the more than 30 felony counts he faces related to his handling of classified documents is an evil conspiracy by “radial l*****ts,” or “the out-of-control Biden administration,” or “George Soros,” or “the media” (including me).
To which I say one thing: Read the indictment.
Just read it.
It is not particularly long. There is not a preponderance of legalese in it. It features excerpts of interviews and recordings, brief transcripts of online exchanges, photographs and more.
In other words, prosecutors brought receipts.
If you read the Trump indictment, you'll agree.
The grand jury, in turn, listened to witnesses, considered the evidence and v**ed in secret to charge Trump (and an aide) with some very serious crimes.
It does not mean he’s guilty.
It just means the evidence could not be ignored and the case should be prosecuted.
If you read the indictment – actually read it – you’ll agree.
Prosecutors point out how Trump stored classified documents in boxes at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, in unsecured places that included a ballroom, office, storage area and even a bathroom.
Trump's classified documents included info on weapons, strategy.
There is audio of Trump sharing classified information with, as the indictment reads, “a writer, a publisher, and two members of his staff, none of whom possessed a security clearance.”
There are reports that Trump told individuals, including his attorney, to “falsely represent” to the FBI that he didn’t have documents, and that he wanted his people to hide them.
And what type of documents are we talking about?
The indictment says they included “information regarding defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries; United States nuclear programs; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.”
Former Attorney General Bill Barr: 'If even half of it is true, then he's toast'
Nuclear programs? Potential vulnerabilities? Plans for retaliation?
Trump’s former Attorney General William Barr condemned his old boss. He said in part, “The government acted responsibly. And it was Donald J. Trump who acted irresponsibly,” adding, “(They’re) solid counts. ... If even half of it is true, then he's toast.”
Barr said the attempts to label the indictment of Trump a witch hunt are “ridiculous.”
The things Trump was indicted for doing land people in prison.
Questioning Trump's charges mean you're willfully ignorant. This month, a retired U.S. Air Force intelligence officer got three years in federal prison for keeping classified documents at his home and other places.
Will Biden pardon Trump? If Donald Trump is convicted, President Biden should pardon him. Really.
If the name on the indictment was anything but Trump, there would be no question – none – that the charges are justified.
Read it. You’ll see.
The former president, like every defendant, must be presumed innocent.
If convicted, he is, as Barr said, toast. Until then, he is not officially guilty of a thing.
But those who choose to willfully ignore the facts of Trump’s case … are.
Be honest. If you saw the evidence, you would have... (
show quote)
Barr is a h**xster. He wouldn't even look at all the fraud concerning the 2020 e******n. Trump should have never hired a Bushee rino, a huge mistake.
BIRDMAN wrote:
And he took a $10 million bribe from Ukraine
Trump didn't shower with his adolescent daughter either. Who knows what else pedo Joe did with his daughter???? Did he use his pay to play game with Ashley too??
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
