Meadows...The Witch Trump Should Have Pardoned Does A Full Spinning Back Flip Pleads Guilty For Immunity: Trump, had he had any "real" brains, would have pardoned the key members of...

woodguru

Trump, had he had any "real" brains, would have pardoned the key members of his staff that had been involved in the questionable activities that were going on.

Meadows had plenty of sense to know and understand that there were things going on he was involved with that he could be prosecuted for...now the DOJ has laid the evidence of what Meadows did and how charges have stacked up, and they are willing to give him immunity for the gaps in the t***h about what they already know, which Meadows is in a key position of knowing things nobody else does.

Like I say, this was one of the most important people for trump to pardon...yet he pardoned bozos like Bannon and Flynn

https://www.rawstory.com/mark-meadows-to-plead-guilty/?cx_testId=4&cx_testVariant=cx_undefined&cx_artPos=5&cx_experienceId=EXC93HV4HK4I#cxrecs_s

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

woodguru wrote:

Trump, had he had any "real" brains, wou... (show quote)

FANTASTIC!!! BLESS YOUR HEART WOODIE!!! AND BLESS RAW STORY!!!

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

woodguru wrote:

Trump, had he had any "real" brains, wou... (show quote)

Just another good old fashioned Troll Alert for more nastiness.

woodguru

Parky60 wrote:

FANTASTIC!!! BLESS YOUR HEART WOODIE!!! AND BLESS RAW STORY!!!

Thank you Sparky...I figure the right needs to be keeping up with the unfolding narrative of what trump is getting hit with so that they don't feel shocked when what we have known is coming finally does.

woodguru

LogicallyRight wrote:

Just another good old fashioned Troll Alert for more nastiness.

Unless you would care to do something about your willful ignorance...

woodguru

LogicallyRight wrote:

Just another good old fashioned Troll Alert for more nastiness.

...what's nasty about keeping up with the news as it unfolds?

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

woodguru wrote:

Thank you Sparky...I figure the right needs to be keeping up with the unfolding narrative of what trump is getting hit with so that they don't feel shocked when what we have known is coming finally does.

FANTASTIC!!! BLESS YOUR HEART WOODIE!!!

JR-57 Loc: South Carolina

woodguru wrote:

Thank you Sparky...I figure the right needs to be keeping up with the unfolding narrative of what trump is getting hit with so that they don't feel shocked when what we have known is coming finally does.

You’re a patient sort. Eight years of chasing your tail, countless hours and untold millions of tax dollars spent and you’ve got squat. It must be very frustrating.

kittibob

JR-57 wrote:

You’re a patient sort. Eight years of chasing your tail, countless hours and untold millions of tax dollars spent and you’ve got squat. It must be very frustrating.

Squat? Indictment.

JR-57 Loc: South Carolina

kittibob wrote:

Squat? Indictment.

An indictment is nothing more than an accusation.

Frankly, I couldn’t care less about what happens to Trump. There are far more important issues in this country to be concerned about.

kittibob

I suppose a grand jury is squat too?

Justice101

kittibob wrote:

Squat? Indictment.

Since, traditionally, the defense doesn’t get a say, it’s pretty easy to get a grand jury to indict someone in most cases. In fact, it’s so easy in most cases that a former New York state chief judge, Sol Wachtler, famously remarked that a prosecutor could persuade a grand jury to “indict a ham sandwich.”

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

woodguru wrote:

Unless you would care to do something about your willful ignorance...

I read and learn. You read and post. Big difference. You aren't worth debating.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

woodguru wrote:

...what's nasty about keeping up with the news as it unfolds?

It is your insatiable need to post wh**ever seems to satisfy your nasty nature.

kittibob

Justice101 wrote:

Since, traditionally, the defense doesn’t get a say, it’s pretty easy to get a grand jury to indict someone in most cases. In fact, it’s so easy in most cases that a former New York state chief judge, Sol Wachtler, famously remarked that a prosecutor could persuade a grand jury to “indict a ham sandwich.”

Yes but most are convicted. You can't convict a ham sandwich.