Milosia2 wrote:
Nope . The national guard is a state M*****a.
Thats an improper use of the American “We The People” logo .
We the people are not planning to o*******w the government, only to favor
A N**i F*****tic Dictator .
It is totally against everything the We The People stand for.
And yes they are still Illegal in 50 states.
Melonoma2, WRONG AGAIN, when you shoot your mouth off, you are only using blanks..... You really need to research things before spreading what you l*****ts call "disinformation".
The M*****a Act of 1903 (32 Stat. 775), also known as the Efficiency in M*****a Act of 1903 or the Dick Act, was legislation enacted by the United States Congress to create what would become the modern National Guard from a subset of the m*****a, and codify the circumstances under which the Guard could be federalized.
The m*****a Act of 1916?
The National Defense Act, ratified by Congress in May 1916 and signed by Wilson on June 3, brought the states' m*****as more under federal control and gave the president authority, in case of war or national emergency, to mobilize the National Guard for the duration of the emergency.
Under the National Defense Act of 1916,1790 the m*****a, which had been an almost purely state institution, was brought under the control of the National Government. The term “m*****a of the United States” was defined to comprehend “all able-bodied male citizens of the United States and all other able-bodied males who have . . . declared their intention to become citizens of the United States,” between the ages of eighteen and forty-five. The act reorganized the National Guard, determined its size in proportion to the population of the several States, required that all enlistments be for “three years in service and three years in reserve,” limited the appointment of officers to those who “shall have successfully passed such tests as to . . . physical, moral and professional fitness as the President shall prescribe,” and authorized the President in certain emergencies to “draft into the military service of the United States to serve therein for the period of the war unless sooner discharged, any or all members of the National Guard and National Guard Reserve,” who thereupon should “stand discharged from the m*****a.”1791
The m*****a clauses do not constrain Congress in raising and supporting a national army. The Court has approved the system of “dual enlistment,” under which persons enlisted in state m*****a (National Guard) units simultaneously enlist in the National Guard of the United States, and, when called to active duty in the federal service, are relieved of their status in the state m*****a. Consequently, the restrictions in the first m*****a clause have no application to the federalized National Guard; there is no constitutional requirement that state governors hold a veto power over federal duty training conducted outside the United States or that a national emergency be declared before such training may take place.1792