Trump Lawsuit Decision: I have made it clear I do not want Trump to run again for a variety of reasons, however that does not mean I do not believe he should not receive fair...

Liberty Tree

I have made it clear I do not want Trump to run again for a variety of reasons, however that does not mean I do not believe he should not receive fair treatment. The lawsuit verdict by the jury was not an evidence verdict but an anti- Trump verdict.

Kevyn

Liberty Tree wrote:

I have made it clear I do not want Trump to run again for a variety of reasons, however that does not mean I do not believe he should not receive fair treatment. The lawsuit verdict by the jury was not an evidence verdict but an anti- Trump verdict.

Any single juror could have v**ed differently, he was found responsible by all of them.

Liberty Tree

Kevyn wrote:

Any single juror could have v**ed differently, he was found responsible by all of them.

He will get no objective treatment in NewYork.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Kevyn wrote:

Any single juror could have v**ed differently, he was found responsible by all of them.

Not responsible for what the plaintiff claimed.

Michael10

archie bunker wrote:

Not responsible for what the plaintiff claimed.

He was convicted in a court of law by a jury of his peers, he's just as guilty as anyone else convicted of a crime in that court.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Michael10 wrote:

He was convicted in a court of law by a jury of his peers, he's just as guilty as anyone else convicted of a crime in that court.

Are you a fan of the death penalty?

Kevyn

Liberty Tree wrote:

He will get no objective treatment in NewYork.

I don know where you are from, are 12 of your randomly selected neighbors so prejudiced they would all arrive at the same wrong conclusion?

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

Michael10 wrote:

He was convicted in a court of law by a jury of his peers, he's just as guilty as anyone else convicted of a crime in that court.

It is a civil lawsuit. There is no conviction. No determination of actual guilt or innocence.

Michael10

Strycker wrote:

It is a civil lawsuit. There is no conviction. No determination of actual guilt or innocence.

Right, they just wanted him to pay out 5 million dollars for no reason. You people will give a pass to rape, d********g! The Jury found he committed sexual abuse against her so yea that's a conviction.

Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich

Kevyn wrote:

Any single juror could have v**ed differently, he was found responsible by all of them.

Demoncrap garbage, & political insanity! just another kangaroo court of mind-dead demoncraps, including the "Judge"!

simply another "SCHIF-FACE"..attempt to besn=mirch the reputation of Trump..[ Our best President]

Scchif-facee....by the way did you say how you feel about over 250 e-mails traded between Jeffrey Epstein, & Schif-face?...[ HUH?...Didja?]

I "know", Epstein, & Schif-face, are *2 of your "heroes'!

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

Michael10 wrote:

Right, they just wanted him to pay out 5 million dollars for no reason. You people will give a pass to rape, d********g! The Jury found he committed sexual abuse against her so yea that's a conviction.

Legally.. nope. And the jury said no rape.

The also is an interview with Anderson Cooper on CNN where the woman said rape for most people is a turn on.

Jimmy Boy

Kevyn wrote:

Any single juror could have v**ed differently, he was found responsible by all of them.

Yes it’s dam weird that these trials can only be in NY or Washington! very stupid people or bought and payed for. Tell me Kevyn where will the. Trial be for Biden taking a shower with his daughter?????? To name just ONE GROSS EVIL SIN HE HAS DONE

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

Michael10 wrote:

Right, they just wanted him to pay out 5 million dollars for no reason. You people will give a pass to rape, d********g! The Jury found he committed sexual abuse against her so yea that's a conviction.

Legally.. nope. And, besides that, the jury said no rape.

The also is an interview with Anderson Cooper on CNN where the woman said rape for most people is sexy.

Look at last three minutes of video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kj_NAIooHw0

woodguru

Liberty Tree wrote:

I have made it clear I do not want Trump to run again for a variety of reasons, however that does not mean I do not believe he should not receive fair treatment. The lawsuit verdict by the jury was not an evidence verdict but an anti- Trump verdict.

You could look at a well run trial, and the trump clown show defense and not attribute his problems to perhaps guilt?

They did say that they didn't have evidence that there was an actual rape, not that it didn't happen, but that in all fairness there was no proof...but believed that groping and inappropriate behavior had.

Wonttakeitanymore

Liberty Tree wrote:

He will get no objective treatment in NewYork.

Ever! Never had fair never will! Ask yourself why they h**e him and fear him so much