One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Betrayal in Behghazi
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Jun 7, 2013 22:45:21   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Here we have some good information about why Obama should have allowed the military people to do their jobs that night. This Colonel is one of the biggest heroes among all those who have flown as fighter pilots and he is mad about what was not done that night and he knows that the fighters from Aviano, Italy could have got there in plenty of time and had enough fuel to make it back to Tripoli. I have to accept what he said and still think that something very fishy went on in Washington that night.

For those here who don't like my source let me tell you that a number of others, although not MSM are available at Google. Just type in the first sentence of my link and see what is there.


http://frontpagemag.com/2013/colonel-phil-handley/betrayal-in-b******i/

Reply
Jun 7, 2013 22:52:18   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Here is an entirely different story about Obama and B******i, again by a military man who knows what should have been done and wasn't.

I think there is a chance that once this information gets out and the MSM is forced to talk about it Our Glorious Leader may well be looking for someplace else to sit while at work, in other words, not the chair in the Oval Office.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/05/29/Blame-the-President-for-B******i

Reply
Jun 7, 2013 22:58:13   #
The Dutchman
 
oldroy wrote:
Here is an entirely different story about Obama and B******i, again by a military man who knows what should have been done and wasn't.

I think there is a chance that once this information gets out and the MSM is forced to talk about it Our Glorious Leader may well be looking for someplace else to sit while at work, in other words, not the chair in the Oval Office.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/05/29/Blame-the-President-for-B******i


Old Roy, Your preaching to the choir here! The useful i***ts in here are never going to pay any attention to what the t***h and facts are, but don't quit trying cause you just may give them something to think about if in fact they are intelligent enough to even know how to click on the URL's

Reply
 
 
Jun 7, 2013 23:20:19   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
oldroy wrote:
Here is an entirely different story about Obama and B******i, again by a military man who knows what should have been done and wasn't.

I think there is a chance that once this information gets out and the MSM is forced to talk about it Our Glorious Leader may well be looking for someplace else to sit while at work, in other words, not the chair in the Oval Office.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/05/29/Blame-the-President-for-B******i


Quid Pro Quo, oldroy: Hello reality. Let's just cut to the chase. Omaggot is a Muslim. No way was he going to order a resque attemt and an attack on the Muslim attackers of B******i and their inflicted ultimate death, some 7-8 hours later, of 4 Americans. Does anyone suspect the t***h, vs the unmitigated lies, might have been detrimental to Obama's re-e******n campaign or his ability to obtain billions in campaign moneys from his Muslim connections in the Middle East, the price for which might jest be the Muslim terrorist connected Obama appointed Tzars in our government. I'm just sayin.

Reply
Jun 8, 2013 01:18:44   #
rumitoid
 
There is no scandal; there is highly regrettable errors. Making this investigation a partisan witch hunt is a disservice to the country. We should not be out to get someone but to correct the errors that got people k**led.

Reply
Jun 8, 2013 04:37:47   #
Ghost Loc: The 1st state to ever secede
 
rumitoid wrote:
There is no scandal; there is highly regrettable errors. Making this investigation a partisan witch hunt is a disservice to the country. We should not be out to get someone but to correct the errors that got people k**led.


There is no Scandal? Wait...what?

I suppose the IRS politically targeting Tea-Party and similar groups isn't a Scandal either? I guess it wasn't political persecution then?

Believe you and me that if this happened under a Republican's watch the Left will be screaming bloody murder and had it pumped all over the media --which is convenient since they own the mainstream-- and probably demand anything short of beheading (metaphorically) whoever is in charge.

So it's okay if the Democrats have a Scandal around their necks but not a Republican? And only Republicans go on witch hunts (which they have in the past) but if a Democrat goes after anyone oh then it's not a witch hunt, it's "political justice..."

You're starting to sound a bit two-faced regarding your other posts.

Reply
Jun 8, 2013 09:57:23   #
The Dutchman
 
rumitoid wrote:
There is no scandal; there is highly regrettable errors. Making this investigation a partisan witch hunt is a disservice to the country. We should not be out to get someone but to correct the errors that got people k**led.


SAY WHAT!You have just succeeded in convicting me and most likely a lot of others that you are in fact not the brightest bulb on the tree, that your elevator doesn't go all the way to the top floor. You sir are definitely one of c*******ms useful i***ts!

"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under
the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist
program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without
knowing how it happened."
Norman Thomas (1884-1968)
Defining liberal (AKA) useful i***t

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-2341-1.html



Reply
Jun 8, 2013 10:14:32   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
rumitoid wrote:
There is no scandal; there is highly regrettable errors. Making this investigation a partisan witch hunt is a disservice to the country. We should not be out to get someone but to correct the errors that got people k**led.



Quid Pro Quo, rumitoady: You must have been sent from Obama or are otherwise just brain dead. Where is your cite to the alleged just errors rationale cover for Omaggot.

Reply
Jun 8, 2013 10:19:12   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
Ghost wrote:
There is no Scandal? Wait...what?

I suppose the IRS politically targeting Tea-Party and similar groups isn't a Scandal either? I guess it wasn't political persecution then?

Believe you and me that if this happened under a Republican's watch the Left will be screaming bloody murder and had it pumped all over the media --which is convenient since they own the mainstream-- and probably demand anything short of beheading (metaphorically) whoever is in charge.


So it's okay if the Democrats have a Scandal around their necks but not a Republican? And only Republicans go on witch hunts (which they have in the past) but if a Democrat goes after anyone oh then it's not a witch hunt, it's "political justice..."

You're starting to sound a bit two-faced regarding your other posts.
There is no Scandal? Wait...what? br br I suppose... (show quote)


Quid Pro Quo, Ghost: Well stated. But I would suggest one new word for you: socialistream for "mainstream" media and press. :D ;) :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jun 8, 2013 12:25:03   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
rumitoid wrote:
There is no scandal; there is highly regrettable errors. Making this investigation a partisan witch hunt is a disservice to the country. We should not be out to get someone but to correct the errors that got people k**led.


I am taking it for granted that you failed to read either of those two pieces I linked. Surely you didn't but then that is the leaner method of getting involved and running away.

So you can know both those Colonels know what did happen and what should have happened. I am sure that if you connect what they said with the lack of a CBA which only Obama could have issued it becomes more and more apparent that there surely is a scandal that has been called the coverup.

Reply
Jun 8, 2013 12:45:51   #
usmc4
 
rumitoid wrote:
There is no scandal; there is highly regrettable errors. Making this investigation a partisan witch hunt is a disservice to the country. We should not be out to get someone but to correct the errors that got people k**led.




The only way we could correct the "error", would be, to have the power to bring the HEROs' back to life.

Reply
Jun 8, 2013 12:54:55   #
The Dutchman
 
rumitoid wrote:
There is no scandal; there is highly regrettable errors. Making this investigation a partisan witch hunt is a disservice to the country. We should not be out to get someone but to correct the errors that got people k**led.

[quote=usmc4 The only way we could correct the "error", would be, to have the power to bring the HEROs' back to life.[/quote]

Error my ass! The only justice would be to publicly execute everyone involved in these murders....

Reply
Jun 8, 2013 12:57:59   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
The Dutchman wrote:
rumitoid wrote:
There is no scandal; there is highly regrettable errors. Making this investigation a partisan witch hunt is a disservice to the country. We should not be out to get someone but to correct the errors that got people k**led.



Error my ass! The only justice would be to publicly execute everyone involved in these murders....


But that would include some generals who have spoken out in favor of the Obama decision to let them be k**led. They did what was called for them to do and that would be to side with Obama.

It has been Colonels and below who have taken the chance and all of them have been retired and could only be touched by taking their retirements away from them. Maybe that is the reason they have taken the chance, knowing that people wouldn't be very glad to see them lose their retirement funds when Obama and group wouldn't lose theirs.

Reply
Jun 8, 2013 13:13:39   #
The Dutchman
 
rumitoid wrote:
There is no scandal; there is highly regrettable errors. Making this investigation a partisan witch hunt is a disservice to the country. We should not be out to get someone but to correct the errors that got people k**led.


Scandal after scandal after scandal. The Obama administration is denying responsibility for the B******i murders, spying on our phone calls. It is spying on our Internet activities. It is targeting conservative groups and recording phone calls of reporters. So... with all that going on, what do you think Obama is hearing?



Reply
Jun 8, 2013 13:40:29   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
The Dutchman wrote:
Scandal after scandal after scandal. The Obama administration is denying responsibility for the B******i murders, spying on our phone calls. It is spying on our Internet activities. It is targeting conservative groups and recording phone calls of reporters. So... with all that going on, what do you think Obama is hearing?


I wonder what he is hearing. He never seems to know anything about any of those scandals until the media tells him and, of course, they aren't going to tell him until Fox and various blogs throw some things out about the scandals. It is too bad that there is so much coming out about B******i when Obama and his Liar in Chief have come to believe that 8 months is a very long time and people will surely forget about B******i with all the other scandals around.

If we forget about B******i, he remains in office with his
scandalous administration that is finally being exposed for what they really are. We need to use B******i to get him and his out of the White House.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.