One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Rogue President
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Dec 1, 2014 12:16:10   #
Defender
 
Outstanding editorial! I do not see a way out, save perhaps a convention of states, as authorized under the constitution. We need to start over, using the same constitution as written by our founders,and in the future vetting p**********l candidates.

A nominee for most ANY position is vetted by Congress. Why not a president?

Reply
Dec 1, 2014 13:37:41   #
mongo Loc: TEXAS
 
Defender wrote:
Outstanding editorial! I do not see a way out, save perhaps a convention of states, as authorized under the constitution. We need to start over, using the same constitution as written by our founders,and in the future vetting p**********l candidates.

A nominee for most ANY position is vetted by Congress. Why not a president?


I fully agree. We should resort back to the original Constitution and start from there. The backlash would be tremendous from corporations because small businesses would be back in full cycle as it was meant to be. Taxes would take quite a hit as well. I'm sure most people on this site remember when lemon-aid stands started getting taxed.

Reply
Dec 1, 2014 13:41:51   #
KHH1
 
stan3186 wrote:
Look you illegal ass invader. Go back where you belong it may not be Mexico but it certainly isn't American with that kind of attitude. Ass kicking my ass. He is a criminal and the white trash liberals are too afraid to do anything because he's a sand n****r and their too afraid of them r**ting. They and you are so smart that when you r**t you destroy and k**l your own property and people. So Stupid. But that is mainly because you know if you come into a white neighborhood, you will get your ass k**led.
Look you illegal ass invader. Go back where you be... (show quote)


**With that response, I guess YOU never got over those TWO ass whippings Pres. Obama gave you all..really struck a nerve with you emotionally unstable piece of s**t trash types...you went over the whole h**e spectrum with your reply.....hahahahahahahahahaha!!!*

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2014 16:14:27   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Defender wrote:
Outstanding editorial! I do not see a way out, save perhaps a convention of states, as authorized under the constitution. We need to start over, using the same constitution as written by our founders,and in the future vetting p**********l candidates.

A nominee for most ANY position is vetted by Congress. Why not a president?


I am solidly against that Convention of States so many people on both sides talk about. How do you know how many progressives of either party would be appointed to that convention? Do you know much about the first Constitutional Convention and what they were appointed to do? So many people just can't realize that they were sent to Philadelphia to consider changes in the Articles of Confederation, our first constitution? What was their first decision? Why to write a whole new constitution to replace the Articles with, of course. What would keep this from happening if your convention had enough progressives to make up a majority? I don't want to see what might come from that bunch.

Reply
Dec 1, 2014 16:56:53   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
oldroy wrote:
I am solidly against that Convention of States so many people on both sides talk about. How do you know how many progressives of either party would be appointed to that convention? Do you know much about the first Constitutional Convention and what they were appointed to do? So many people just can't realize that they were sent to Philadelphia to consider changes in the Articles of Confederation, our first constitution? What was their first decision? Why to write a whole new constitution to replace the Articles with, of course. What would keep this from happening if your convention had enough progressives to make up a majority? I don't want to see what might come from that bunch.
I am solidly against that Convention of States so ... (show quote)


:thumbup: I concur with your summation.

Reply
Dec 1, 2014 23:02:03   #
Weyner
 
KHH1 wrote:
**With that response, I guess YOU never got over those TWO ass whippings Pres. Obama gave you all..really struck a nerve with you emotionally unstable piece of s**t trash types...you went over the whole h**e spectrum with your reply.....hahahahahahahahahaha!!!*


KHH1, You are a Stupid Ass.

Reply
Dec 2, 2014 00:34:25   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Weyner wrote:
KHH1, You are a Stupid Ass.


He is aware of that but can't help himself and keeps showing it with each comment posted.

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2014 01:06:11   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
He is aware of that but can't help himself and keeps showing it with each comment posted.


I just added this one's name to a list that another member of the forum and I are creating. Trolls are trolls and you can't get away from that.

Reply
Dec 2, 2014 01:15:03   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
Weyner wrote:
KHH1, You are a Stupid Ass.

Thank you for telling him the t***h...

Reply
Dec 4, 2014 12:22:52   #
CarolSeer2016
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Nope.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


Well, that pretty much tells me a lot about your personality.

Reply
Dec 4, 2014 13:19:40   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Well, that pretty much tells me a lot about your personality.
And just what is that?

Reply
 
 
Dec 4, 2014 13:25:17   #
CarolSeer2016
 
Weyner wrote:
KHH1, You are a Stupid Ass.


He's only a half-ass, Weyner. Notice there was only one asterisk at the end of his statement!!

Reply
Dec 26, 2014 06:16:26   #
okie don
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Your next ass kicker.


Yep,Same old Bush Clinton carp!

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 15:32:25   #
CarolSeer2016
 
oldroy wrote:
I am solidly against that Convention of States so many people on both sides talk about. How do you know how many progressives of either party would be appointed to that convention? Do you know much about the first Constitutional Convention and what they were appointed to do? So many people just can't realize that they were sent to Philadelphia to consider changes in the Articles of Confederation, our first constitution? What was their first decision? Why to write a whole new constitution to replace the Articles with, of course. What would keep this from happening if your convention had enough progressives to make up a majority? I don't want to see what might come from that bunch.
I am solidly against that Convention of States so ... (show quote)


Oldroy, aside from discussing possible benefits that might accrue from a state convention, what other remedies could you suggest?

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 15:42:08   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
KHH1 wrote:
**With that response, I guess YOU never got over those TWO ass whippings Pres. Obama gave you all..really struck a nerve with you emotionally unstable piece of s**t trash types...you went over the whole h**e spectrum with your reply.....hahahahahahahahahaha!!!*


:-)



Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.