The game plan for maga conservatives to lose (Page 2): and money would actually be worth something.

Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle

and money would actually be worth something.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

pegw wrote:

You belive Newsmax, the far right mega biased news source? They have a low degree of reliabilty. Personally, I cannot figure how anyone would v**e for Rand Paul. His stance on C***d was criminal.

ahahahahaha, ahahahahaha, ahahahahahaha. Yeah the Dems want freedom of choice if it means k*****g babies inside the womb but God forbid if I want to decide rather or not to take an experimental drug or decide what speech is relevant to me. F**k you !d!0ts!

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Bevvy wrote:

Senator Manchin is strongly committed to developing a balanced national energy plan that utilizes all of our resources and recognizes that f****l f**ls will be a vital part of our energy mix for decades to come. He believes that a balanced, commonsense approach that considers the needs of our environment and the demands of our economy, can and must be developed if we are to achieve energy independence within this generation.

There ya go, see we do have a Democrat with half a brain. See their still around but nobodies listening. It's old fashion to use common sense in today's America1

martsiva

saltwind 78 wrote:

proud, I never understood the apparent hatred show... (show quote)

F***i was the one who said this v***s was no threat to the US!! F***i is tid at the hip with Gates and the Clintons! F***i is the one who flip flopped on everything he said!!

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

saltwind 78 wrote:

proud, I never understood the apparent hatred show... (show quote)

salt, I never understood the apparent hatred shown to president Trump. He had to deal with a p******c of a new v***s that had the ability to k**l 2% of the people it infected. Since this v***s is a just new strain of a c****av***s that has been around for quite some time, he had to find an efficient and effective way to deal with it, so he looked to Doktor Fauxi to lead the charge. There is no telling how many more lives would have been saved if he'd have found a medical scientist who wasn't a political party tool.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

pegw wrote:

You belive Newsmax, the far right mega biased news source? They have a low degree of reliabilty. Personally, I cannot figure how anyone would v**e for Rand Paul. His stance on C***d was criminal.

His stance on C***D was scientific, unlike that of progressives. He is a physician. The position of F***i was criminal.

It might help if you progressives learned some t***h.

pegw

crazylibertarian wrote:

His stance on C***D was scientific, unlike that of progressives. He is a physician. The position of F***i was criminal.

It might help if you progressives learned some t***h.

Rand Paul is not a medical doctor. He is an optometrist. He can fit glasses. I am so glad he didn't got to Med school, as he would have k**led people.

Rose42

saltwind 78 wrote:

pegs, You just said it all.

No, peg relies on others to tell her what to think and never checks for herself. Thats the only way to know if something is true

Pegs posts about ‘fact checkers’ are totally useless. Those who care check for themselves and those who don’t won’t.

Rose42

pegw wrote:

Rand Paul is not a medical doctor. He is an optometrist. He can fit glasses. I am so glad he didn't got to Med school, as he would have k**led people.

You must be ‘woke’. Woke folks are nasty people

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

pegw wrote:

Rand Paul is not a medical doctor. He is an optometrist. He can fit glasses. I am so glad he didn't got to Med school, as he would have k**led people.

Proof of stupid on endless display from you.

Get a cat.

pegw

martsiva wrote:

F***i was the one who said this v***s was no threat to the US!! F***i is tid at the hip with Gates and the Clintons! F***i is the one who flip flopped on everything he said!!

The thing about science is that when more data cones in, it can change your conclusions. A good example of it is at the beginning of the C***d epidemic, many drugs were tested to see if they were effective.Ivermectin was one drug. It showed initial promise, but the big double blind study finally proved it just didn't work. F***i was an honorable epidemiologist and always made a decision on available data.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

pegw wrote:

The thing about science is that when more data cones in, it can change your conclusions. A good example of it is at the beginning of the C***d epidemic, many drugs were tested to see if they were effective.Ivermectin was one drug. It showed initial promise, but the big double blind study finally proved it just didn't work. F***i was an honorable epidemiologist and always made a decision on available data.

ahahahahaaha, ahahahahahahaha, so honorable that he volunteered that he was indirectly funding g**n of f******n research, NOT! LMAO

martsiva

pegw wrote:

The thing about science is that when more data cones in, it can change your conclusions. A good example of it is at the beginning of the C***d epidemic, many drugs were tested to see if they were effective.Ivermectin was one drug. It showed initial promise, but the big double blind study finally proved it just didn't work. F***i was an honorable epidemiologist and always made a decision on available data.

THEN he should have kept his mouth shut until more data came in and instead told a lie!! No honorable epidemiologist would be tied at the hip to a known criminal like Gates and your noe would he flip flop om everything he said!! Your lack of research is miserable and obvious!!

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

pegw wrote:

The thing about science is that when more data cones in, it can change your conclusions. A good example of it is at the beginning of the C***d epidemic, many drugs were tested to see if they were effective.Ivermectin was one drug. It showed initial promise, but the big double blind study finally proved it just didn't work. F***i was an honorable epidemiologist and always made a decision on available data.

More proof....thanks