OPP Poll........Unions
Apr 1, 2023 17:23:06 #
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
The National Right to Work Act protects workers fr... (show quote)
Yep!
To make us taxpayers replace the money they stole!
F-unions!
Apr 1, 2023 20:36:57 #
microphor
Loc: Home is TN
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
The National Right to Work Act protects workers fr... (show quote)
sure doApr 2, 2023 11:53:29 #
microphor wrote: sure do
sure domicrophore, there is more to the passage of the National Right to Work Act giving us the power to withhold dues or drop out of an unwanted union; forced membership, (indeed, forced ANYTHING), good or bad, will turn people away.
Today, 80% of the workforce refuses to join a union.
The biggest unions are teachers unions and just look at the quality of the public schools. There's a clue.
Good teachers cannot discipline the bad students and bullies, good principals cannot fire the bad teachers defended by bad unions mounting costly lawsuits. The bad teachers just get moved to a new district.
In fact, passage of the National Right to Work Act would clean up the crooked unions and INCREASE INION MEMBERSHIP threefold!
It is in our American blood to demand the freedom to choose, black, white, or skybluepink. We do not want rule by the self-anointed "intelligentsia" and believe you me, the "intelligentsia" is a dirty gang of thieves and perverts.
Apr 2, 2023 21:30:17 #
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
The right to work is the right to work for low wages without benefits-- ask anybody who has left a right to work state.
As opposed to the right to be forced to pay for services and political activity that you strongly disagree with?
Apr 2, 2023 21:38:28 #
billlingle wrote:
It would be in violation of the union contract with the shop to do what you suggest. Secondly, no owner would consider what you proposed. First it would really raise hell with his other employees and secondly it would involve an entirely different payroll schedule for one employee. If joining a union is that horrible to you then apply at a non-union shop.
Of course what I suggested would be a violation of the UNION CONTRACT, it would show how useless and exploitive unions can be. On the other hand it is very common in non-union companies where individuals do their own negations. As for applying at a non-union shop, a bit difficult when such establishments are prohibited by state law.
Apr 3, 2023 20:03:41 #
SeaLass wrote:
Of course what I suggested would be a violation of the UNION CONTRACT, it would show how useless and exploitive unions can be. On the other hand it is very common in non-union companies where individuals do their own negations. As for applying at a non-union shop, a bit difficult when such establishments are prohibited by state law.
This is the real question:
1) When 80% of the public is against forced membership in labor unions, due to labor leader embezzlement of pension funds,
2) and passage of the National Right to Work Act would oust the crooked leaders and INCREASE UNION MEMGERSHIP 3-FOLD,
Why don't the Rank & File and Democrats help pass this NRTW ACT bill?
Does this corruption also extend to union financing our politicians?
At what point do we become suspicious?
Apr 3, 2023 21:35:55 #
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
This is the real question:
1) When 80% of the public is against forced membership in labor unions, due to labor leader embezzlement of pension funds,
2) and passage of the National Right to Work Act would oust the crooked leaders and INCREASE UNION MEMGERSHIP 3-FOLD,
Why don't the Rank & File and Democrats help pass this NRTW ACT bill?
Does this corruption also extend to union financing our politicians?
At what point do we become suspicious?
1) When 80% of the public is against forced membership in labor unions, due to labor leader embezzlement of pension funds,
2) and passage of the National Right to Work Act would oust the crooked leaders and INCREASE UNION MEMGERSHIP 3-FOLD,
Why don't the Rank & File and Democrats help pass this NRTW ACT bill?
Does this corruption also extend to union financing our politicians?
At what point do we become suspicious?
Well I believe that point was in 2008!
Apr 3, 2023 23:41:24 #
Marty 2020 wrote:
Well I believe that point was in 2008!
Why, 2008? Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama both squabbled for the nomination all the way to Dianne Feinstein's house in San Francisco who negotiated a truce. Even though Hillary had far fewer points she would not drop out, so Obama literally bailed her out to force her to drop out.
Hillary who had illegally accepted Chinese campaign donations and was in debt after being forced to return them, she was bought off by Barak being promised a Secretary of State appointment. The unions had nothing to do with Obama. Why? Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy were pushing the nationalization of all police, firemen and First Responder unions under one roof one day after 9/11 on 9/12/2001. The entire nation would be held hostage during a national crisis under a threat of a strike.
This was organized crime. The Mafia has been behind both the Clinton and Kennedy families.
Even the police unions recognized this threat and would not back Hillary Clinton. But they did not jump on the bandwagon for Obama either. There was turmoil after 9/11/2001, Enron collapsed, then Enron's accounting firm Arthur Andersen Accounting and Consulting both collapsed - deemed a conflict of interest; then the other 50,000 corporate clients of Arthur Andersen went down like dominoes, many of whom the AFL-CIO had invested pension funds in, like World.com.
The mainstream media made a blackout on this chaos and corruption in the AFL-CIO.
At this point, the Teamsters, Food-workers Union and the SEIU broke off from the AFL-CIO and formed their own club. President John Sweeney of the AFL-CIO gave back his stock in World.com, he and his pension accountants accused of insider trading just before their collapse. Sweeney was re-elected President another term, nevertheless. By 2002, Putin fired Arthur Andersen as the consultant to the Russian Ministry of Finance, a position held since 1972, gifted to the USSR by Richard Nixon under Detente.
The Sarbanes Oxley Act "T***h in Accounting Act" was passed by Congress, but it only pertains to the private sector when keeping a double set of books, one for the IRS, the other for Wall Street. Sarbanes Oxley does not pertain to the government or GSEs whose bookkeeping methods took a brain surgeon to square.
Snakes, snakes, I see snakes everywhere.
Apr 3, 2023 23:46:34 #
Apr 3, 2023 23:50:22 #
Apr 4, 2023 00:47:54 #
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Oh, good grief. this is pathetic, but true.
👍
Apr 4, 2023 21:42:41 #
Please add this documentary on Hillary Clinton by Dinesh D'Souza:
Hillary's America/Chronicles Shocking Documentary/Movie!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX8m_Q1mzHA
Keep in mind that Hillary Rodham was a protege of Saul Alinsky, author of "Rules for Radicals" Alinsky was a former accountant to Mafioso Al Capone whose cartoon caricature above apply reflects upon the situation at hand. For his expose of political corruption in America, D'Souza was persecuted under President Obama. The Democrats picked upon the wrong man.
Now they are picking upon Donald Trump. Once again, the Democrats are picking upon the wrong man. Their whole house of cards is coming down.
Hillary's America/Chronicles Shocking Documentary/Movie!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX8m_Q1mzHA
Keep in mind that Hillary Rodham was a protege of Saul Alinsky, author of "Rules for Radicals" Alinsky was a former accountant to Mafioso Al Capone whose cartoon caricature above apply reflects upon the situation at hand. For his expose of political corruption in America, D'Souza was persecuted under President Obama. The Democrats picked upon the wrong man.
Now they are picking upon Donald Trump. Once again, the Democrats are picking upon the wrong man. Their whole house of cards is coming down.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.