One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Thoughts - A picture is worth a thousand words
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 24, 2023 12:45:20   #
Lily
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
I'm way ahead of most of you on OPP, both sides. I disliked Trump way back in the 80's and maybe before. I didn't like him in the 2016 primaries. But I was all for him against Clinton. She was a zero factor with me. I also saw how the media was starting to portray him the day he announced and the way they fawned over him before. I h**ed his damn tweets and hoped they would take away his twitter machine as soon as he got elected. It would have given people a better chance to see him as a leader. But in order to give up that twitter machine, the press had to at least give him a fair press. That NEVER happened, and it cost him, them, and all of America. Because his policies started to really turn into some damn good things for America, despite all of the constant daily hatred and vindictiveness aimed at him for all directions. C***d was an unfortunate circumstance that t***sformed a great America economy for everyone into an utter disaster, pushed by unt***hful medical industry from top to bottom and in all directions, and their democrat governors and other supporters. Meanwhile Trump has a bull s**t impeachment trial and wins over the lies of a nothing situation. Then comes the e******n. Officially called for biden, that was the most f********t e******n in America, ever. The Big Lie is not that T***p w*n. But that Trump couldn't overcome all of the hatred drummed up by democrat lies and the biased lying press, and the hatred from Congress and all of the political trickery by democrats behind the scene. Virtually no one could ever in the right mind, with any level of intelligence, say they really wanted biden. Maybe taking biden over Trump, but not, just, wanting biden. You can't be that stupid. 1*6 happened. It was not an i**********n. Period. A rally, a protest, that turned partly into a r**t and a lot of destruction. This was not led by Trump supporters or encouraged by Trump. Outside elements, not Conservatives, created this. It was the final weapon to bury Trump. Only so far it hasn't. And this witch hunt against Trump goes on and on, fueled by bias, and hatred, and lack of understanding. This is unprecedented in American history and opens the door for political persecution for all losing candidates forevermore. Totally unAmerican. If Trump becomes the candidate for president of the Republican Party in 2024, I will v**e for him and wear a MAGA hat to the polls. His policy ideas are still better then any concept that the democrats could ever put forth, and any democrat running for president. FACT.

Logically Right
I'm way ahead of most of you on OPP, both sides. I... (show quote)


Let’s be clear. C***D was not an ”unfortunate event”. It was exactly what they planned and succeeded even more effective timely than planned!

Reply
Mar 24, 2023 13:40:47   #
JR-57 Loc: South Carolina
 
Lily wrote:
Let’s be clear. C***D was not an ”unfortunate event”. It was exactly what they planned and succeeded even more effective timely than planned!

🎯

Reply
Mar 24, 2023 13:43:16   #
Big dog
 
JR-57 wrote:
🎯


A biological warfare agent is a weapon of mass destruction and C***d is exactly that. Most importantly, it was intentionally used and most definitely only an opening shot!!

Reply
 
 
Mar 24, 2023 13:50:58   #
JR-57 Loc: South Carolina
 
Big dog wrote:
A biological warfare agent is a weapon of mass destruction and C***d is exactly that. Most importantly, it was intentionally used and most definitely only an opening shot!!

I’ve previously posted my thoughts on C***d at great length on other threads. In a nut shell; first development attempts were in the U.S. then t***sferred to W***n, funded with U.S. tax dollars, and intentionally released. C***d was a test to determine how compliant U.S. citizens would be to government mandated orders, crash the U.S. economy, and as a bonus conveniently and severely hamper Trump’s attempt at a second term.

Reply
Mar 24, 2023 14:07:21   #
Big dog
 
JR-57 wrote:
I’ve previously posted my thoughts on C***d at great length on other threads. In a nut shell; first development attempts were in the U.S. then t***sferred to W***n, funded with U.S. tax dollars, and intentionally released. C***d was a test to determine how compliant U.S. citizens would be to government mandated orders, crash the U.S. economy, and as a bonus conveniently and severely hamper Trump’s attempt at a second term.


Hmm, I did Not comply, did Not get the v*****e, and worked throughout the whole p******c.
I also went on a buying binge. Shotgun shells and rifle rounds.

Reply
Mar 24, 2023 14:11:22   #
guzzimaestro
 
Big dog wrote:
Hmm, I did Not comply, did Not get the v*****e, and worked throughout the whole p******c.
I also went on a buying binge. Shotgun shells and rifle rounds.


☑️

Reply
Mar 24, 2023 14:12:34   #
JR-57 Loc: South Carolina
 
Big dog wrote:
Hmm, I did Not comply, did Not get the v*****e, and worked throughout the whole p******c.
I also went on a buying binge. Shotgun shells and rifle rounds.

Excellent.

Reply
 
 
Mar 24, 2023 14:25:59   #
Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana
 
Lily wrote:
Let’s be clear. C***D was not an ”unfortunate event”. It was exactly what they planned and succeeded even more effective timely than planned!


You're right Lily, it was a plan to k**l off a lot of people and to find out how easy it is to control the masses.

Reply
Mar 24, 2023 14:28:41   #
Justice101
 
JR-57 wrote:
I’ve previously posted my thoughts on C***d at great length on other threads. In a nut shell; first development attempts were in the U.S. then t***sferred to W***n, funded with U.S. tax dollars, and intentionally released. C***d was a test to determine how compliant U.S. citizens would be to government mandated orders, crash the U.S. economy, and as a bonus conveniently and severely hamper Trump’s attempt at a second term.


Very astute analysis.

Reply
Mar 24, 2023 14:28:49   #
F.D.R.
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Although I don't agree with all if Trump's platforms...And often find his manner of speaking distasteful.. I'll happily give my support to him in 2024...


Agreed ! But he may be too badly tarnished for most v**ers and we can be assured there'll be no letup in the attacks against him, likely till the day he dies.

Reply
Mar 24, 2023 15:02:59   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
guzzimaestro wrote:
All that being said, I think Trump is on a high learning curve and if he regains the Presidency his mistakes will not be repeated. Will he make new ones? Probably, but hopefully of lesser magnitude. As far as his personality, that's part of the package, but after a few years of the biden puppet presidency, most will be a little more tolerant. Of course the media will be in the high speed spin mode, but will have even less credibility.


Agreed.

Reply
 
 
Mar 24, 2023 15:08:30   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
Lily wrote:
Let’s be clear. C***D was not an ”unfortunate event”. It was exactly what they planned and succeeded even more effective timely than planned!


I'm not sure I agree. The lies and t***hs are still being sorted out. There was a lot of evil behind a lot of it, but how much was planned for it to happen just like it did, I have some doubts. Mainly opportunists making hay wherever they could, within what lies and unt***hs they could muster, and how much financial gain and power they could accumulate while blocking real t***hs and solutions. A real debacle.

Logically Right

Reply
Mar 24, 2023 15:24:47   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Although I don't agree with all if Trump's platforms...And often find his manner of speaking distasteful.. I'll happily give my support to him in 2024...


Four are installed and two are legit. Reagan and Trump are legit.

Reply
Mar 24, 2023 15:42:06   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
manning5 wrote:
The nation desperately needs effective leadership, and that isn't going to come from the left that gave us Biden and string pullers, instead of a fully-aware and strong person. Trump was very effective in running the country, and had a long list of great accomplishments to his credit to offset his annoying habits.

I will v**e President Trump if he’s nominated! But I will v**e Republican

Reply
Mar 24, 2023 16:22:43   #
manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA
 
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
I will v**e President Trump if he’s nominated! But I will v**e Republican


======================
We need to ensure the diamond v****g machines are honest.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.