One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
If the white house nominates a ham sandwich for a judge
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 21, 2023 13:31:47   #
Bevvy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6oafHRmE2o

Will all dems v**e for it ?

Reply
Feb 21, 2023 13:43:48   #
Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle
 
Even the jews and Muslims

Reply
Feb 21, 2023 14:35:42   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
That was a classic justifiable rant and well worth it. The Rep and con should be outraged by these facts, The dems ans libs should be ashamed by there falling to the level they have fallen, a rubber stamp for a brain dead puppet.

Logically Right

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2023 14:59:27   #
Fred day
 
There is no doubt that the Republicans would all v**e to put it on the panel if it supported their agenda. The question itself let's me know who asks it. Republicans know they would, so they expect that democrats would. It is obvious by the people the Republicans backed in the midterms that they would undoubtedly back a ham sandwich if they could count on its v**e.

Reply
Feb 21, 2023 15:18:34   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Fred day wrote:
There is no doubt that the Republicans would all v**e to put it on the panel if it supported their agenda. The question itself let's me know who asks it. Republicans know they would, so they expect that democrats would. It is obvious by the people the Republicans backed in the midterms that they would undoubtedly back a ham sandwich if they could count on its v**e.


Another word salad!!..

Reply
Feb 21, 2023 15:54:40   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
Fred day wrote:
There is no doubt that the Republicans would all v**e to put it on the panel if it supported their agenda. The question itself let's me know who asks it. Republicans know they would, so they expect that democrats would. It is obvious by the people the Republicans backed in the midterms that they would undoubtedly back a ham sandwich if they could count on its v**e.


Did your mom have any kids that lived?

Reply
Feb 21, 2023 15:57:54   #
Justice101
 
Fred day wrote:
There is no doubt that the Republicans would all v**e to put it on the panel if it supported their agenda. The question itself let's me know who asks it. Republicans know they would, so they expect that democrats would. It is obvious by the people the Republicans backed in the midterms that they would undoubtedly back a ham sandwich if they could count on its v**e.


What is the agenda of the Republicans? Requiring the judges to know the Constitution? Having people to support the police and follow the law? Not basing their ideology on violence and h**e when they lose power? Who are the "people the Republicans backed in the midterms that would undoubtedly back a ham sandwich if they could count on its v**e"?

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2023 16:27:54   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
proud republican wrote:
Another word salad!!..


Correction: A word CHEF salad. After all, it DOES have ham in it.

Reply
Feb 21, 2023 16:32:34   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Correction: A word CHEF salad. After all, it DOES have ham in it.


True!...😘❤

Reply
Feb 21, 2023 16:38:41   #
billlingle
 
All the ham sandwiches that have managed to pass the bar have already been appointed by Fat Donny the Loser. This includes guys who have never tried a case, never prepared a brief, never ASSISTED in a case and had never had a client charged with a crime. Fat Donny appointed them to a LIFE TIME term on the bench with the understanding that they would take instruction from those right wing weenies who actually knew how to manipulate and obfuscate.

The woman that Greasy Ted was describing on the video had an excellent record of accomplishment combined with extensive trial experience. She is an ideal candidate for the bench. The fact that her record indicates that she would not put up with the likes of Ted Cruz is his problem. We already have seen the results of Fat Donny's clown show with Aileen Cannon, the judge that blew her career on the bench with her first case due to her "handling" of Fat Donny's document theft case and her removal from the case by the 11th circuit.

Biden vows to fill every federal vacancy by his re-e******n in 2024 and it sure looks like he's going to do it. Thank you Raphael Gamaliel Warnock for your victory over Hershel the moron Walker. It is that 51st seat that makes the appointment process a cake walk and leaves guys like Cruz with nothing but stupid comments that can be laughed off while the winning v**es are counted.

Reply
Feb 21, 2023 16:45:53   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
billlingle wrote:
All the ham sandwiches that have managed to pass the bar have already been appointed by Fat Donny the Loser. This includes guys who have never tried a case, never prepared a brief, never ASSISTED in a case and had never had a client charged with a crime. Fat Donny appointed them to a LIFE TIME term on the bench with the understanding that they would take instruction from those right wing weenies who actually knew how to manipulate and obfuscate.

The woman that Greasy Ted was describing on the video had an excellent record of accomplishment combined with extensive trial experience. She is an ideal candidate for the bench. The fact that her record indicates that she would not put up with the likes of Ted Cruz is his problem. We already have seen the results of Fat Donny's clown show with Aileen Cannon, the judge that blew her career on the bench with her first case due to her "handling" of Fat Donny's document theft case and her removal from the case by the 11th circuit.

Biden vows to fill every federal vacancy by his re-e******n in 2024 and it sure looks like he's going to do it. Thank you Raphael Gamaliel Warnock for your victory over Hershel the moron Walker. It is that 51st seat that makes the appointment process a cake walk and leaves guys like Cruz with nothing but stupid comments that can be laughed off while the winning v**es are counted.
All the ham sandwiches that have managed to pass t... (show quote)


You are full of BS..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_Kavanaugh

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Gorsuch

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2023 17:15:07   #
Justice101
 
billlingle wrote:
All the ham sandwiches that have managed to pass the bar have already been appointed by Fat Donny the Loser. This includes guys who have never tried a case, never prepared a brief, never ASSISTED in a case and had never had a client charged with a crime. Fat Donny appointed them to a LIFE TIME term on the bench with the understanding that they would take instruction from those right wing weenies who actually knew how to manipulate and obfuscate.

The woman that Greasy Ted was describing on the video had an excellent record of accomplishment combined with extensive trial experience. She is an ideal candidate for the bench. The fact that her record indicates that she would not put up with the likes of Ted Cruz is his problem. We already have seen the results of Fat Donny's clown show with Aileen Cannon, the judge that blew her career on the bench with her first case due to her "handling" of Fat Donny's document theft case and her removal from the case by the 11th circuit.

Biden vows to fill every federal vacancy by his re-e******n in 2024 and it sure looks like he's going to do it. Thank you Raphael Gamaliel Warnock for your victory over Hershel the moron Walker. It is that 51st seat that makes the appointment process a cake walk and leaves guys like Cruz with nothing but stupid comments that can be laughed off while the winning v**es are counted.
All the ham sandwiches that have managed to pass t... (show quote)


She didn't know what the 2nd Amendment consisted of, and she passed law school? You are of course disingenuous and a bit ridiculous.

Reply
Feb 22, 2023 13:46:59   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Fred day wrote:
There is no doubt that the Republicans would all v**e to put it on the panel if it supported their agenda. The question itself let's me know who asks it. Republicans know they would, so they expect that democrats would. It is obvious by the people the Republicans backed in the midterms that they would undoubtedly back a ham sandwich if they could count on its v**e.


Saying it doesn't make it true. In fact 99.3175% of everything Democrats say, think & do is wrong for humanity & our Republic.

Reply
Feb 22, 2023 15:31:53   #
Fred day
 
Nice number to pick out of the air Mr. SPOCK.

Reply
Feb 22, 2023 16:03:26   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Fred day wrote:
Nice number to pick out of the air Mr. SPOCK.


My computations are irrefutable. Live long and prosper! 😶

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.