Taxes should be applied to all religious 'businesses'
And what is the business name you're cursing?????
Yes, you are too h**eful to have an answer.
Sonny Magoo wrote:
And what is the business name you're cursing?????
It is just showing more ignorance. It was not paid for by a church and most of the money came from a private individual.
Rinaldi wrote:
Taxes should be applied to all religious 'businesses'
The person that tweeted this is ignorant. Those who contributed ARE taxed.
You got another one wrong raylan.
Rinaldi wrote:
Taxes should be applied to all religious 'businesses'
Unfortunately, I have to agree with you. Because the church has stopped preaching the fundamentals of the Bible, and, because of its need for money to pay for the mechanics of keeping it going, the church has resorted to accommodating its 'sales package," in order to get people to attend, to secular nonsense. The "Gospel," the essence of why Christian believers get together on Sunday, is no longer the main attraction, it is rock and roll mediocrity in the music and so-called ego-centric prosperity criers.
We discussed this last night during a zoom meeting of a group of friends. It was brought up as a waste of money. They could have spent it on helping the needy.
Rinaldi wrote:
Taxes should be applied to all religious 'businesses'
man made g****l w*****g is a religion and should be taxed
Rinaldi wrote:
Taxes should be applied to all religious 'businesses'
Stand at attention, lock your heels together maggot & pay rapt attention. The ability to tax churches, or other religious entities, implies an ability to control which is vehemently against the 1st Amendment. We realize attacking the Constitution and controlling religion is another highly desired Marxist objective, yet you'll lose; hells bells dummy, you lost 2000 years ago. We might have entered that time where we're beginning to separate the wheat from the chaff. If so, you're soon to be off to the ovens. BTW have you taken notice that you Marxist morons primarily attack Christianity? Christ is your acknowledge enemy.
Once you've read, marked, learned & inwardly digested today's lesson you are dismissed. 😁
Liberty Tree wrote:
It is just showing more ignorance. It was not paid for by a church and most of the money came from a private individual.
The ‘church’ is not a building. The church is the body of Christ.
pegw wrote:
We discussed this last night during a zoom meeting of a group of friends. It was brought up as a waste of money. They could have spent it on helping the needy.
Since you do not belong to this religious group you have no say. If you were to join then your opinion would matter.
RascalRiley wrote:
The ‘church’ is not a building. The church is the body of Christ.
The Ecclesia is the Worshipping Body of Christ who predominantly worship together in a building called a Church. Jesus also worshipped God in a building with others.
pegw wrote:
We discussed this last night during a zoom meeting of a group of friends. It was brought up as a waste of money. They could have spent it on helping the needy.
The needy to you l*****t is only a mere talking point you use to make yourselves feel righteous but something you never quite seem to do anything about. Most of the homeless needy dwell in cities run by Democrats. Actually the beginning of our homeless masses began when Democrats kicked them out of institutions into the streets as an act of their compassion. Remember?
pegw wrote:
We discussed this last night during a zoom meeting of a group of friends. It was brought up as a waste of money. They could have spent it on helping the needy.
Do you ever give to the needy? Probably not as much as those who bought the ad. And why not criticize those who bought the other ads?
I know why.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.